Paper · 1985 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Effects of Cultivar, Postharvest Storage, Preprocessing Dip Treatments and Style of Pack on the Processing Quality of Strawberries

J. R. Morris; W. A. Sistrunk; C. A. Sims; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
54
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Two cultivars of strawberries originally harvested for fresh market were held under 5 postharvest storage treatments and then dipped in one of 4 chemical treatments. The berries were sliced or left whole, dipped, and then processed by freezing or thermal processing. The processed product from ‘Cardinal’ was superior to that from ‘Sunrise’ in this study, regardless of the holding or dip treatment. ‘Cardinal’ berries could be utilized for processing initially and after storage for 4 days at 4°C and after 2 days at 21°; however, ‘Sunrise’ was acceptable only initially and up to 4 days at 4°. Dipping berries for 1 min in a 0.5% calcium lactate solution or a 0.5% Ca lactate plus 1% citric acid solution improved berry firmness and character. The Ca dips were more effective in firming sliced berries than in firming whole berries. The Howard mold count of the berries became a major limiting factor for many of the postharvest storage treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Processed Cardinal strawberries were superior to Sunrise regardless of holding or dip treatment.

Taxon
StrawberriesFragaria ×ananassat0
Material
Cardinale0
Outcome
superiore0
Direction
superiore0
Qualifier
regardless of the holding or dip treatmente0
Comparator
Sunrisee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Cultivar, Postharvest Storage, Preprocessing Dip Treatments and Style of Pack on the Processing Quality of Strawberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–130 · show in text ↑
e0

“The processed product from ‘Cardinal’ was superior to that from ‘Sunrise’ in this study, regardless of the holding or dip treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–408 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cardinal strawberries remained suitable for processing after four days at 4°C.

Taxon
StrawberriesFragaria ×ananassat0
Material
Cardinale0
Outcome
could be utilized for processinge0
Qualifier
4 days at 4°Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Cultivar, Postharvest Storage, Preprocessing Dip Treatments and Style of Pack on the Processing Quality of Strawberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–130 · show in text ↑
e0

“‘Cardinal’ berries could be utilized for processing initially and after storage for 4 days at 4°C and after 2 days at 21°”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–530 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cardinal strawberries remained suitable for processing after two days at 21°.

Taxon
StrawberriesFragaria ×ananassat0
Material
Cardinale0
Outcome
could be utilized for processinge0
Qualifier
2 days at 21°e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Cultivar, Postharvest Storage, Preprocessing Dip Treatments and Style of Pack on the Processing Quality of Strawberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–130 · show in text ↑
e0

“‘Cardinal’ berries could be utilized for processing initially and after storage for 4 days at 4°C and after 2 days at 21°”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–530 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunrise strawberries were acceptable only initially and through four days at 4°.

Taxon
StrawberriesFragaria ×ananassat0
Material
Sunrisee0
Outcome
acceptablee0
Qualifier
up to 4 days at 4°e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Cultivar, Postharvest Storage, Preprocessing Dip Treatments and Style of Pack on the Processing Quality of Strawberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–130 · show in text ↑
e0

“‘Sunrise’ was acceptable only initially and up to 4 days at 4°.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–604 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 0.5% calcium lactate dip improved berry firmness and character.

Taxon
StrawberriesFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
0.5% calcium lactate solutione0
Outcome
berry firmness and charactere0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Cultivar, Postharvest Storage, Preprocessing Dip Treatments and Style of Pack on the Processing Quality of Strawberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–130 · show in text ↑
e0

“Dipping berries for 1 min in a 0.5% calcium lactate solution or a 0.5% Ca lactate plus 1% citric acid solution improved berry firmness and character.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–754 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A dip with 0.5% Ca lactate and 1% citric acid improved berry firmness and character.

Taxon
StrawberriesFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
0.5% Ca lactate plus 1% citric acid solutione0
Outcome
berry firmness and charactere0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Cultivar, Postharvest Storage, Preprocessing Dip Treatments and Style of Pack on the Processing Quality of Strawberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–130 · show in text ↑
e0

“Dipping berries for 1 min in a 0.5% calcium lactate solution or a 0.5% Ca lactate plus 1% citric acid solution improved berry firmness and character.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–754 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium dips firmed sliced berries more than whole berries.

Taxon
StrawberriesFragaria ×ananassat0
Organ / stage
sliced berriese0
Treatment
Ca dipse0
Outcome
firming sliced berriese0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
whole berriese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Cultivar, Postharvest Storage, Preprocessing Dip Treatments and Style of Pack on the Processing Quality of Strawberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–130 · show in text ↑
e0

“The Ca dips were more effective in firming sliced berries than in firming whole berries.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–843 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Howard mold count limited many postharvest storage treatments.

Taxon
StrawberriesFragaria ×ananassat0
Outcome
Howard mold count of the berriese0
Qualifier
major limiting factore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Cultivar, Postharvest Storage, Preprocessing Dip Treatments and Style of Pack on the Processing Quality of Strawberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–130 · show in text ↑
e0

“The Howard mold count of the berries became a major limiting factor for many of the postharvest storage treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–959 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · quality: postharvest · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

22 papers: 18 positive, 4 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

lactate · quality: postharvest · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

citric acid · quality: postharvest · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.