Paper · 1974 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

The Commercial Implications of Gibberellin A4A7 Plus Benzyladenine for Improving Shape and Yield of ‘Delicious’ Apples1

C. R. Unrath

14
claims
41
verbatim quotes
31
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Gibberellin A 4 A 7 (GA 4-7 ) and benzyladenine (BA) were applied to ‘Starkrimson Delicious’ apples from 1969 through 1972. In initial tests, GA 4-7 + BA (50 to 200 ppm each) increased fruit length, fruit wt and length/diam ratio (L/D) but did not alter diam or fruit color. Firmness and seed numbers were reduced only at 200 ppm. At concn above 50 ppm flower initiation was substantially reduced. Concentrations of 25 ppm were as effective as 50 ppm but concentrations below 25 ppm were not effective. To be most effective, these materials must be applied between full bloom and petal fall. In general, a single application was more effective than split applications. Repeated annual applications of 50 ppm resulted in continued good response and no adverse effects. In one of the 4 years tested, fruit set but not commercial crop, was significantly reduced by applications of GA 4-7 + BA. Air blast applications were as effective as hand gun applications even when the amount of spray mixture/acre was substantially reduced. The average fruit weight response in all experiments reported was 12 and 20% at 25 and 50 ppm, respectively. The improved fruit shape and increased fruit mass could justify the use of GA 4-7 + BA in apple producing areas where post bloom temp conditions reduce “typiness”.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA and BA at 50 to 200 ppm increased fruit length, weight and length-to-diameter ratio.

Treatment
GA 4-7 + BA (50 to 200 ppm each)e0e1t0
Outcome
fruit length, fruit wt and length/diam ratio (L/D)e0e1t0
Direction
increasede0e1t0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GA 4-7 + BA (50 to 200 ppm each) increased fruit length, fruit wt and length/diam ratio (L/D) but did not alter diam or fruit color.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–283 · show in text ↑
e1

“Concentrations of 25 ppm were as effective as 50 ppm but concentrations below 25 ppm were not effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–511 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Delicious’ Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA and BA did not alter fruit diameter or color.

Treatment
GA 4-7 + BA (50 to 200 ppm each)e0e1t0
Outcome
diam or fruit colore0e1t0
Direction
did not altere0e1t0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GA 4-7 + BA (50 to 200 ppm each) increased fruit length, fruit wt and length/diam ratio (L/D) but did not alter diam or fruit color.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–283 · show in text ↑
e1

“Concentrations of 25 ppm were as effective as 50 ppm but concentrations below 25 ppm were not effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–511 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Delicious’ Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Firmness and seed number were reduced only at 200 ppm.

Treatment
200 ppme0e1t0
Outcome
Firmness and seed numberse0e1t0
Direction
reducede0e1t0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Firmness and seed numbers were reduced only at 200 ppm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–339 · show in text ↑
e1

“Concentrations of 25 ppm were as effective as 50 ppm but concentrations below 25 ppm were not effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–511 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Delicious’ Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Concentrations above 50 ppm substantially reduced flower initiation.

Treatment
concn above 50 ppme0e1t0
Outcome
flower initiatione0e1t0
Direction
reducede0e1t0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At concn above 50 ppm flower initiation was substantially reduced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–406 · show in text ↑
e1

“Concentrations of 25 ppm were as effective as 50 ppm but concentrations below 25 ppm were not effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–511 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Delicious’ Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

25 ppm was as effective as 50 ppm, while lower concentrations were ineffective.

Treatment
25 ppme0e1t0
Outcome
as effectivee0e1t0
Direction
as effectivee0e1t0
Qualifier
concentrations below 25 ppm were not effectivee0e1t0
Comparator
50 ppme0e1t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Concentrations of 25 ppm were as effective as 50 ppm but concentrations below 25 ppm were not effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–511 · show in text ↑
e1

“Concentrations of 25 ppm were as effective as 50 ppm but concentrations below 25 ppm were not effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–511 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Delicious’ Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–118 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applications between full bloom and petal fall were most effective.

Organ / stage
between full bloom and petal falle0e1t0
Outcome
most effectivee0e1t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To be most effective, these materials must be applied between full bloom and petal fall.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–600 · show in text ↑
e1

“Concentrations of 25 ppm were as effective as 50 ppm but concentrations below 25 ppm were not effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–511 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Delicious’ Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A single application was generally more effective than split applications.

Treatment
single applicatione0e1t0
Outcome
more effectivee0e1t0
Direction
more effectivee0e1t0
Comparator
split applicationse0e1t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a single application was more effective than split applications.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–677 · show in text ↑
e1

“Concentrations of 25 ppm were as effective as 50 ppm but concentrations below 25 ppm were not effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–511 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Delicious’ Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeated annual 50 ppm applications retained a good response without adverse effects.

Treatment
Repeated annual applications of 50 ppme0e1t0
Outcome
continued good response and no adverse effectse0e1t0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Repeated annual applications of 50 ppm resulted in continued good response and no adverse effects.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–776 · show in text ↑
e1

“Concentrations of 25 ppm were as effective as 50 ppm but concentrations below 25 ppm were not effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–511 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Delicious’ Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In one year, GA and BA significantly reduced fruit set.

Treatment
applications of GA 4-7 + BAe0e1t0
Outcome
fruit sete0e1t0
Direction
reducede0e1t0
Qualifier
one of the 4 years testede0e1t0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In one of the 4 years tested, fruit set but not commercial crop, was significantly reduced by applications of GA 4-7 + BA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–899 · show in text ↑
e1

“Concentrations of 25 ppm were as effective as 50 ppm but concentrations below 25 ppm were not effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–511 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Delicious’ Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same applications did not significantly reduce commercial crop.

Treatment
applications of GA 4-7 + BAe0e1t0
Outcome
commercial crope0e1t0
Direction
note0e1t0
Qualifier
one of the 4 years testede0e1t0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In one of the 4 years tested, fruit set but not commercial crop, was significantly reduced by applications of GA 4-7 + BA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–899 · show in text ↑
e1

“Concentrations of 25 ppm were as effective as 50 ppm but concentrations below 25 ppm were not effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–511 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Delicious’ Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Air blast application was as effective as hand gun application with less spray mixture.

Treatment
Air blast applicationse0e1t0
Outcome
as effectivee0e1t0
Direction
as effectivee0e1t0
Qualifier
amount of spray mixture/acre was substantially reducede0e1t0
Comparator
hand gun applicationse0e1t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Air blast applications were as effective as hand gun applications even when the amount of spray mixture/acre was substantially reduced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1035 · show in text ↑
e1

“Concentrations of 25 ppm were as effective as 50 ppm but concentrations below 25 ppm were not effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–511 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Delicious’ Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 25 ppm, average fruit weight response was 12%.

Treatment
25 ppme0e1t0
Outcome
average fruit weight responsee0e1t0
Value
12 and 20%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average fruit weight response in all experiments reported was 12 and 20% at 25 and 50 ppm, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1144 · show in text ↑
e1

“Concentrations of 25 ppm were as effective as 50 ppm but concentrations below 25 ppm were not effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–511 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Delicious’ Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 50 ppm, average fruit weight response was 20%.

Treatment
50 ppme0e1t0
Outcome
average fruit weight responsee0e1t0
Value
20%e0e1t0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average fruit weight response in all experiments reported was 12 and 20% at 25 and 50 ppm, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1144 · show in text ↑
e1

“Concentrations of 25 ppm were as effective as 50 ppm but concentrations below 25 ppm were not effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–511 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Delicious’ Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–118 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest GA and BA use where post-bloom temperatures reduce typical apple shape.

Outcome
use of GA 4-7 + BAe0e1
Qualifier
post bloom temp conditions reduce “typiness”e0e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The improved fruit shape and increased fruit mass could justify the use of GA 4-7 + BA in apple producing areas where post bloom temp conditions reduce “typiness”.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1308 · show in text ↑
e1

“Concentrations of 25 ppm were as effective as 50 ppm but concentrations below 25 ppm were not effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–511 · show in text ↑

N-benzyladenine · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

75 papers: 57 positive, 18 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

Gibberellic acid · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

N-benzyladenine · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Gibberellic acid · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 16 positive, 11 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.