Abstract
Fresh cut flower has characteristis such as perishable and short shelf life. Pulse treatment is akind of method that can prolong fresh cut flower’s shelf life. Pulse treatment is a postharvesthandling which is done by soaking the stem of flower into a solution containing nutrients(glucose and sucrose) and germicides. The objectives of this reseacrh were to determine the bestalternatives of pulse treatment and determine shelf life of fresh cut rose flower of eachtreatment. There were 6 alternatives, namely P 1 (5% sucrose+20 mg/l AgNO 3 ), P 2 (150 mg/lAgNO 3 ), P 3 (1,2% sucrose+0,2 mM STS), P 4 (5% sucrose+20 mg/l AgNO 3 +320 mg/l citricacid), P 5 (1,2% sucrose+ 0,2 mM STS+ warm water (40 0 C)), P 6 (5% sucrose+20 mg/lAgNO 3 +320 mg/l citric acid+warm water (40 0 C)). The parameters used for determining shelflife are color of petals (lightness and redness), moisture content, and texture of stem. As results,shelf life of P1 was 8 days, P2 was 6 days, P3 was 4 days, P4 was 6 days, P5 was 5 days, andP6 was 5 days. All of the alternatives gave longer shelf life than control (4 days). The bestalternatives was P1 with 8 days shelf life. Moisture content in that day was 78,313%, texture ofstem was 47,0603 N, lightness was 31,237 and redness was 46,942.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
P1 gave rose flowers an eight day shelf life, longer than the four day control.
- Taxon
- Rose (Rosa hybrida)
Rosa hybrid cultivart0 - Treatment
- P 1 (5% sucrose+20 mg/l AgNO 3 )e0
- Outcome
- shelf lifee1
- Direction
- longere2
- Value
- 8 dayse1
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“P 1 (5% sucrose+20 mg/l AgNO 3 )”
e1“shelf life of P1 was 8 days”
e2“longer shelf life than control (4 days)”
t0“Rose (Rosa hybrida)”
Claim · model-written summary
P2 yielded a six day rose shelf life, compared with four days for the control.
- Taxon
- Rose (Rosa hybrida)Rosa hybrid cultivart0
- Treatment
- P 2 (150 mg/lAgNO 3 )e0
- Outcome
- shelf lifee2
- Direction
- longere2
- Value
- 6 dayse1
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“P 2 (150 mg/lAgNO 3 )”
e1“P2 was 6 days”
e2“longer shelf life than control (4 days)”
t0“Rose (Rosa hybrida)”
Claim · model-written summary
P3 gave four days of rose shelf life, equal to the stated four day control.
- Taxon
- Rose (Rosa hybrida)Rosa hybrid cultivart0
- Treatment
- P 3 (1,2% sucrose+0,2 mM STS)e0
- Outcome
- shelf lifee3
- Value
- 4 dayse1
- Comparator
- controle2
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“P 3 (1,2% sucrose+0,2 mM STS)”
e1“P3 was 4 days”
e2“control (4 days)”
e3“shelf life of P1 was 8 days”
t0“Rose (Rosa hybrida)”
Claim · model-written summary
P4 yielded six days of rose shelf life.
- Taxon
- Rose (Rosa hybrida)Rosa hybrid cultivart0
- Treatment
- P 4 (5% sucrose+20 mg/l AgNO 3 +320 mg/l citricacid)e0
- Outcome
- shelf lifee2
- Direction
- longere2
- Value
- 6 dayse1
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“P 4 (5% sucrose+20 mg/l AgNO 3 +320 mg/l citricacid)”
e1“P4 was 6 days”
e2“longer shelf life than control (4 days)”
t0“Rose (Rosa hybrida)”
Claim · model-written summary
P5 yielded five days of rose shelf life.
- Taxon
- Rose (Rosa hybrida)Rosa hybrid cultivart0
- Treatment
- P 5 (1,2% sucrose+ 0,2 mM STS+ warm water (40 0 C))e0
- Outcome
- shelf lifee2
- Direction
- longere2
- Value
- 5 dayse1
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“P 5 (1,2% sucrose+ 0,2 mM STS+ warm water (40 0 C))”
e1“P5 was 5 days”
e2“longer shelf life than control (4 days)”
t0“Rose (Rosa hybrida)”
Claim · model-written summary
P6 yielded five days of rose shelf life.
- Taxon
- Rose (Rosa hybrida)Rosa hybrid cultivart0
- Treatment
- P 6 (5% sucrose+20 mg/lAgNO 3 +320 mg/l citric acid+warm water (40 0 C))e0
- Outcome
- shelf lifee2
- Direction
- longere2
- Value
- 5 dayse1
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“P 6 (5% sucrose+20 mg/lAgNO 3 +320 mg/l citric acid+warm water (40 0 C))”
e1“P6 was 5 days”
e2“longer shelf life than control (4 days)”
t0“Rose (Rosa hybrida)”
Claim · model-written summary
P1 was identified as the best pulse alternative with eight days of shelf life.
- Taxon
- Rose (Rosa hybrida)Rosa hybrid cultivart0
- Treatment
- P1e0
- Outcome
- bestalternativese0
- Value
- 8 dayse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The bestalternatives was P1 with 8 days shelf life.”
t0“Rose (Rosa hybrida)”
Claim · model-written summary
On day eight, moisture content was 78,313%.
- Taxon
- Rose (Rosa hybrida)Rosa hybrid cultivart0
- Outcome
- Moisture contente0
- Value
- 78,313%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Moisture content in that day was 78,313%”
t0“Rose (Rosa hybrida)”
Claim · model-written summary
On day eight, stem texture was 47,0603 N.
- Taxon
- Rose (Rosa hybrida)Rosa hybrid cultivart0
- Outcome
- texture ofsteme0
- Value
- 47,0603 Ne0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“texture ofstem was 47,0603 N”
t0“Rose (Rosa hybrida)”
Claim · model-written summary
On day eight, lightness was 31,237.
- Taxon
- Rose (Rosa hybrida)Rosa hybrid cultivart0
- Outcome
- lightnesse0
- Value
- 31,237e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“lightness was 31,237”
t0“Rose (Rosa hybrida)”
Claim · model-written summary
On day eight, redness was 46,942.
- Taxon
- Rose (Rosa hybrida)Rosa hybrid cultivart0
- Outcome
- rednesse0
- Value
- 46,942e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“redness was 46,942”
t0“Rose (Rosa hybrida)”
The same questions in other papers
silver(1+) nitrate · quality: postharvest · Rosa hybrid cultivarPositive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.