Paper · 2022 · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences

Volatile-mediated between-plant communication in Scots pine and the effects of elevated ozone

Hao Yu; Minna Kivimäenpää; James D. Blande

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
18
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Conifers are dominant tree species in boreal forests, but are susceptible to attack by bark beetles. Upon bark beetle attack, conifers release substantial quantities of volatile organic compounds known as herbivore-induced plant volatiles (HIPVs). Earlier studies of broadleaved plants have shown that HIPVs provide information to neighbouring plants, which may enhance their defences. However, the defence responses of HIPV-receiver plants have not been described for conifers. Here we advance knowledge of plant-plant communication in conifers by documenting a suite of receiver-plant responses to bark-feeding-induced volatiles. Scots pine seedlings exposed to HIPVs were more resistant to subsequent weevil feeding and received less damage. Receiver plants had both induced and primed volatile emissions and their resin ducts had an increased epithelial cell (EC) mean area and an increased number of cells located in the second EC layer. Importantly, HIPV exposure increased stomatal conductance and net photosynthesis rate of receiver plants. Receiver-plant responses were also examined under elevated ozone conditions and found to be significantly altered. However, the final defence outcome was not affected. These findings demonstrate that HIPVs modulate conifer metabolism through responses spanning photosynthesis and chemical defence. The responses are adjusted under ozone stress, but the defence benefits remain intact.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Volatile-exposed Scots pine seedlings resisted subsequent weevil feeding and received less damage.

Taxon
Scots pinePinus sylvestrise0
Treatment
exposed to HIPVse0
Interactor
weevile0herbivore
Outcome
weevil feeding and received less damagee0
Direction
lesse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus sylvestris
Pinus sylvestris · TaxonHello, I am Bruce on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Scots pine seedlings exposed to HIPVs were more resistant to subsequent weevil feeding and received less damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–743 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Receiver pine plants showed induced and primed volatile emissions.

Taxon
Scots pinePinus sylvestrist0
Treatment
HIPVse1
Outcome
induced and primed volatile emissionse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus sylvestris
Pinus sylvestris · TaxonHello, I am Bruce on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Receiver plants had both induced and primed volatile emissions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–807 · show in text ↑
t0

“Scots pine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–59 · show in text ↑
e1

“Scots pine seedlings exposed to HIPVs were more resistant to subsequent weevil feeding and received less damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–743 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Receiver pine resin ducts had greater epithelial cell area and more second-layer cells.

Taxon
Scots pinePinus sylvestrist0
Organ / stage
resin ductse0
Treatment
HIPVse1
Outcome
epithelial cell (EC) mean area and an increased number of cells located in the second EC layere0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus sylvestris
Pinus sylvestris · TaxonHello, I am Bruce on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“their resin ducts had an increased epithelial cell (EC) mean area and an increased number of cells located in the second EC layer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–941 · show in text ↑
t0

“Scots pine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–59 · show in text ↑
e1

“Scots pine seedlings exposed to HIPVs were more resistant to subsequent weevil feeding and received less damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–743 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HIPV exposure increased stomatal conductance and net photosynthesis in receiver pines.

Taxon
Scots pinePinus sylvestrist0
Treatment
HIPV exposuree0
Outcome
stomatal conductance and net photosynthesis ratee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus sylvestris
Pinus sylvestris · TaxonHello, I am Bruce on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HIPV exposure increased stomatal conductance and net photosynthesis rate of receiver plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1047 · show in text ↑
t0

“Scots pine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated ozone significantly altered receiver-plant responses.

Taxon
Scots pinePinus sylvestrist0
Treatment
elevated ozone conditionse0
Outcome
Receiver-plant responsese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus sylvestris
Pinus sylvestris · TaxonHello, I am Bruce on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Receiver-plant responses were also examined under elevated ozone conditions and found to be significantly altered”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1162 · show in text ↑
t0

“Scots pine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated ozone did not affect the final defense outcome.

Taxon
Scots pinePinus sylvestrist0
Treatment
elevated ozonee1
Outcome
final defence outcomee0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus sylvestris
Pinus sylvestris · TaxonHello, I am Bruce on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, the final defence outcome was not affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1215 · show in text ↑
t0

“Scots pine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–59 · show in text ↑
e1

“Receiver-plant responses were also examined under elevated ozone conditions and found to be significantly altered”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1162 · show in text ↑

ozone · disease · Pinus sylvestris (Scots pine)Results agree

5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.