Paper · 1986 · HortScience

Interaction between an Indigenous Endomycorrhizal Fungus and Mineral Nutrition of Rosa multiflora Understock

D. R. Paterson; Ruth A. Taber; H. B. Pemberton; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
2
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Disbudded ‘Brooks 56’ Rosa multiflora Thunb. plants were grown in 0.01 or 0.1 Steiner solutions and inoculated with indigenous vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal (VAMF) species, Glomus fasciculatum (Thax. sensu Gerd.) Gerd. and Trappe. Inoculation resulted in a significant increase in both fresh and dry weight of the R. multiflora plants. Increasing the Steiner solution from 0.01 to 0.1 resulted not only in a significant decrease in the rate of VAMF infection, but also in a significant increase in the fresh and dry weight of the multiflora understock.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation significantly increased fresh and dry weight.

Taxon
R. multifloraRosa multiflorae0
Treatment
Inoculatione0
Interactor
Endomycorrhizal Fungust0symbiont
Outcome
fresh and dry weighte0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa multiflora
Rosa multiflora · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation resulted in a significant increase in both fresh and dry weight of the R. multiflora plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–353 · show in text ↑
t0

“Endomycorrhizal Fungus and Mineral Nutrition of Rosa multiflora Understock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing Steiner solution strength significantly reduced VAMF infection.

Taxon
Rosa multifloraRosa multiflorat0
Treatment
Steiner solution from 0.01 to 0.1e0
Interactor
VAMFe0symbiont
Outcome
rate of VAMF infectione0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
0.01e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa multiflora
Rosa multiflora · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the Steiner solution from 0.01 to 0.1 resulted not only in a significant decrease in the rate of VAMF infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–477 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosa multiflora Understock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing Steiner solution strength significantly raised understock fresh and dry weight.

Taxon
Rosa multifloraRosa multiflorat0
Treatment
Steiner solution from 0.01 to 0.1e0
Outcome
fresh and dry weighte0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
0.01e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa multiflora
Rosa multiflora · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the Steiner solution from 0.01 to 0.1 resulted not only in a significant decrease in the rate of VAMF infection, but also in a significant increase in the fresh and dry weight of the multiflora understock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–570 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosa multiflora Understock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–108 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Rosa multiflora (Japanese rose)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.