Paper · 2022 · Agriculture

Application of Desert DSEs to Nonhost Plants: Potential to Promote Growth and Alleviate Drought Stress of Wheat Seedlings

Xia Li; Yanxia Liu; Qiannan Ye; et al.

13
claims
24
verbatim quotes
17
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

To evaluate the applicability of desert dark septate endophytes (DSEs) in crop cultivation, Alternaria alternata (Fr.) Keissl. (Aa), Paraphoma pye Moslemi & P.W.J. Taylor (Pp), and Paraphoma radicina (McAlpine) Morgan-Jones & J.F. White (Pr) were inoculated into nonhost wheat growing under three water conditions. The plants’ biomass, vegetative growth, and physiological parameters were investigated. At harvest, all DSE strains were effective colonizers under all treatments. These DSEs generally positively affected wheat growth but varied among different DSE species, and this promoting effect was more obvious under drought conditions. Under mild drought (MD) treatments, Aa and Pr increased the leaf number and plant height of hosts. Pr showed a significant beneficial influence on the wheat’s total biomass under all treatments, while Aa and Pp showed benefits only under the well-watered or MD treatment. The response mechanisms of DSE-inoculated wheat under stress may be due to the enhanced photosynthetic efficiency and antioxidant system. Generally, Pr had a stronger beneficial effect. The improved growth and fitness of the inoculated hosts under drought stress may reduce their water supply requirements during seedling growth. We speculate that inoculating wheat with this strain could be a promising approach for water-saving cultivation in arid environments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All three dark septate endophytes colonized wheat under all water treatments.

Interactor
DSEe0symbiont
Outcome
effective colonizerse0
Qualifier
under all treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At harvest, all DSE strains were effective colonizers under all treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–478 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dark septate endophytes generally promoted wheat growth, more clearly under drought.

Treatment
DSEse0
Interactor
DSEse0symbiont
Outcome
wheat growthe0
Direction
positively affectede0
Qualifier
more obvious under drought conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These DSEs generally positively affected wheat growth but varied among different DSE species, and this promoting effect was more obvious under drought conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–641 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternaria alternata increased wheat leaf number under mild drought.

Treatment
Aae0
Interactor
AaAae0symbiont
Outcome
leaf numbere0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
mild drought (MD)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aa
Aa · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Eric in SF · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under mild drought (MD) treatments, Aa and Pr increased the leaf number and plant height of hosts.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–740 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternaria alternata increased wheat height under mild drought.

Treatment
Aae0
Interactor
AaAae0symbiont
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
mild drought (MD)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aa
Aa · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Eric in SF · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under mild drought (MD) treatments, Aa and Pr increased the leaf number and plant height of hosts.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–740 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paraphoma radicina increased wheat leaf number under mild drought.

Treatment
Pre0
Interactor
Pre0symbiont
Outcome
leaf numbere0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
mild drought (MD)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under mild drought (MD) treatments, Aa and Pr increased the leaf number and plant height of hosts.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–740 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paraphoma radicina increased wheat height under mild drought.

Treatment
Pre0
Interactor
Pre0symbiont
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
mild drought (MD)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under mild drought (MD) treatments, Aa and Pr increased the leaf number and plant height of hosts.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–740 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Paraphoma radicina significantly benefited wheat total biomass under all water treatments.

Treatment
Pre0
Interactor
Pre0symbiont
Outcome
wheat’s total biomasse0
Direction
beneficiale0
Qualifier
under all treatmentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pr showed a significant beneficial influence on the wheat’s total biomass under all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–835 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternaria alternata benefited wheat biomass only under well watered or mild drought conditions.

Treatment
Aae0
Interactor
AaAae0symbiont
Outcome
total biomasse1
Direction
benefitse0
Qualifier
well-watered or MD treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aa
Aa · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Eric in SF · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aa and Pp showed benefits only under the well-watered or MD treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–913 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat’s total biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paraphoma pye benefited wheat biomass only under well watered or mild drought conditions.

Treatment
Ppe0
Interactor
Ppe0symbiont
Outcome
total biomasse1
Direction
benefitse0
Qualifier
well-watered or MD treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aa and Pp showed benefits only under the well-watered or MD treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–913 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat’s total biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–814 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Enhanced photosynthetic efficiency and antioxidant activity may explain inoculated wheat responses to stress.

Treatment
DSE-inoculatede0
Interactor
DSEe0symbiont
Outcome
response mechanismse0
Qualifier
enhanced photosynthetic efficiency and antioxidant systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The response mechanisms of DSE-inoculated wheat under stress may be due to the enhanced photosynthetic efficiency and antioxidant system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1051 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paraphoma radicina had the stronger beneficial effect overall.

Interactor
Pre0symbiont
Outcome
stronger beneficial effecte0
Direction
strongere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Generally, Pr had a stronger beneficial effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1099 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest inoculated wheat might require less water during seedling growth.

Outcome
reduce their water supply requirements during seedling growthe0
Qualifier
improved growth and fitness of the inoculated hosts under drought stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The improved growth and fitness of the inoculated hosts under drought stress may reduce their water supply requirements during seedling growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1243 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose inoculating wheat with Paraphoma radicina for water saving cultivation in arid environments.

Outcome
inoculating wheat with this strain could be a promising approach for water-saving cultivation in arid environmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculating wheat with this strain could be a promising approach for water-saving cultivation in arid environments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1377 · show in text ↑

light · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

85 papers: 46 positive, 39 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

inoculation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

532 papers: 476 positive, 56 negative or no effect

475 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

528 papers more in this group

See all 532 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.