Paper · 2026 · Plant Physiology and Biochemistry

Desert dark septate endophytes improve wheat seedling drought tolerance through photosynthetic protection and antioxidant defense

Qiannan Ye; Bolin Li; Minghui Xu; et al.

14
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Dark septate endophytes (DSEs) are a type of endophytic fungi colonizing plant roots with a broad distribution, especially in extreme habitats such as deserts. Various studies have demonstrated that DSEs can enhance plant growth under stress conditions. In this study, wheat seedlings were inoculated with two desert-derived dark septate endophytes, Alternaria alstroemeriae (Aa), Paraphoma chrysanthemicola (Pc), or left uninoculated as control (CK), and exposed to either adequate watering (WW) or drought (DD) conditions. Six treatment groups, Aa_WW, Aa_DD, Pc_WW, Pc_DD, CK_WW and CK_DD, were established. The results suggested that inoculation with either Aa or Pc significantly promoted wheat performance under WW and DD conditions. Under two water conditions, inoculation with Aa and Pc significantly promoted the shoot and root growth of wheat. Notably, Aa exhibited a stronger promoting effect on root system under DD treatment, increasing total root length by 17.75%. Under DD treatment, inoculation with Pc significantly enhanced wheat photosynthesis, increasing photosynthesis rate, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, and chlorophyll content by 30.00%, 33.33%, 47.22%, and 5.61%, respectively. Both DSE strains enhanced osmotic adjustment under drought stress. Aa increased soluble sugar, soluble protein and glutathione contents, while Pc elevated proline and glutathione levels, leading to significant reductions in malondialdehyde accumulation by 24.24% and 19.09%, respectively. In addition, both Aa and Pc significantly increased auxin content of wheat leaves. Consistent with the improved physiological and growth performance, transcriptomic analysis revealed that DSE inoculation induced differential expression of genes primarily enriched in pathways related to photosynthesis, carbohydrate metabolism, signal transduction, antioxidants defense, collectively contributing to enhanced wheat drought tolerance. Consequently, these findings demonstrate the great potential of desert-derived DSE strains for improving wheat growth and drought resilience in arid and semi-arid agricultural ecosystems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aa inoculation promoted wheat shoot and root growth under both water conditions.

Treatment
inoculation with Aae0
Interactor
AaAae0symbiont
Outcome
shoot and root growthe0
Direction
promotede0
Comparator
uninoculated as control (CK)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aa
Aa · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Eric in SF · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under two water conditions, inoculation with Aa and Pc significantly promoted the shoot and root growth of wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–852 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat seedlings were inoculated with two desert-derived dark septate endophytes, Alternaria alstroemeriae (Aa), Paraphoma chrysanthemicola (Pc), or left uninoculated as control (CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–450 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pc inoculation promoted wheat shoot and root growth under both water conditions.

Treatment
inoculation with Aa and Pce0
Interactor
Pce0symbiont
Outcome
shoot and root growthe0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under two water conditions, inoculation with Aa and Pc significantly promoted the shoot and root growth of wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–852 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, Aa increased total root length by 17.75%.

Treatment
Aae0
Interactor
AaAae0symbiont
Outcome
total root lengthe0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
17.75%e0
Qualifier
DD treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aa
Aa · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Eric in SF · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aa exhibited a stronger promoting effect on root system under DD treatment, increasing total root length by 17.75%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–977 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat seedlings were inoculated with two desert-derived dark septate endophytes, Alternaria alstroemeriae (Aa), Paraphoma chrysanthemicola (Pc), or left uninoculated as control (CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–450 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, Pc raised photosynthesis rate by 30.00%.

Treatment
inoculation with Pce0
Interactor
Pce0symbiont
Outcome
photosynthesis ratee0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
30.00%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under DD treatment, inoculation with Pc significantly enhanced wheat photosynthesis, increasing photosynthesis rate, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, and chlorophyll content by 30.00%, 33.33%, 47.22%, and 5.61%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1212 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, Pc raised stomatal conductance by 33.33%.

Treatment
Pce1
Interactor
Pce1symbionte0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
33.33%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing photosynthesis rate, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, and chlorophyll content by 30.00%, 33.33%, 47.22%, and 5.61%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1212 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat seedlings were inoculated with two desert-derived dark septate endophytes, Alternaria alstroemeriae (Aa), Paraphoma chrysanthemicola (Pc), or left uninoculated as control (CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–450 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, Pc raised transpiration rate by 47.22%.

Treatment
Pce1
Interactor
Pce1symbionte0
Outcome
transpiration ratee0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
47.22%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing photosynthesis rate, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, and chlorophyll content by 30.00%, 33.33%, 47.22%, and 5.61%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1212 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat seedlings were inoculated with two desert-derived dark septate endophytes, Alternaria alstroemeriae (Aa), Paraphoma chrysanthemicola (Pc), or left uninoculated as control (CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–450 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, Pc raised chlorophyll content by 5.61%.

Treatment
Pce1
Interactor
Pce1symbionte0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
5.61%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing photosynthesis rate, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, and chlorophyll content by 30.00%, 33.33%, 47.22%, and 5.61%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1212 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat seedlings were inoculated with two desert-derived dark septate endophytes, Alternaria alstroemeriae (Aa), Paraphoma chrysanthemicola (Pc), or left uninoculated as control (CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–450 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aa enhanced drought osmotic adjustment and increased soluble sugar, protein and glutathione.

Treatment
Aae0
Interactor
AaAae0symbiont
Outcome
soluble sugar, soluble protein and glutathione contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aa
Aa · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Eric in SF · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both DSE strains enhanced osmotic adjustment under drought stress. Aa increased soluble sugar, soluble protein and glutathione contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1348 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat seedlings were inoculated with two desert-derived dark septate endophytes, Alternaria alstroemeriae (Aa), Paraphoma chrysanthemicola (Pc), or left uninoculated as control (CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–450 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pc elevated proline and glutathione levels under drought.

Treatment
Pce0
Interactor
Pce0symbiont
Outcome
proline and glutathione levelse0
Direction
elevatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pc elevated proline and glutathione levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1398 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat seedlings were inoculated with two desert-derived dark septate endophytes, Alternaria alstroemeriae (Aa), Paraphoma chrysanthemicola (Pc), or left uninoculated as control (CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–450 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aa reduced malondialdehyde accumulation by 24.24%.

Treatment
Aae1
Interactor
AaAae1symbiont
Outcome
malondialdehyde accumulatione0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
24.24%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aa
Aa · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Eric in SF · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leading to significant reductions in malondialdehyde accumulation by 24.24% and 19.09%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1501 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat seedlings were inoculated with two desert-derived dark septate endophytes, Alternaria alstroemeriae (Aa), Paraphoma chrysanthemicola (Pc), or left uninoculated as control (CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–450 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pc reduced malondialdehyde accumulation by 19.09%.

Treatment
Pce1
Interactor
Pce1symbiont
Outcome
malondialdehyde accumulatione0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
19.09%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leading to significant reductions in malondialdehyde accumulation by 24.24% and 19.09%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1501 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat seedlings were inoculated with two desert-derived dark septate endophytes, Alternaria alstroemeriae (Aa), Paraphoma chrysanthemicola (Pc), or left uninoculated as control (CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–450 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aa increased wheat leaf auxin content.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
Aae0
Interactor
AaAae0symbiont
Outcome
auxin contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aa
Aa · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Eric in SF · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both Aa and Pc significantly increased auxin content of wheat leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1515–1584 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pc increased wheat leaf auxin content.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
Pce0
Interactor
Pce0symbiont
Outcome
auxin contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both Aa and Pc significantly increased auxin content of wheat leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1515–1584 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DSE inoculation induced differential expression of genes in photosynthesis, metabolism, signalling and antioxidant pathways.

Treatment
DSE inoculatione0
Interactor
DSEe0symbiont
Outcome
differential expression of genese0
Direction
inducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DSE inoculation induced differential expression of genes primarily enriched in pathways related to photosynthesis, carbohydrate metabolism, signal transduction, antioxidants defense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1690–1871 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat seedlings were inoculated with two desert-derived dark septate endophytes, Alternaria alstroemeriae (Aa), Paraphoma chrysanthemicola (Pc), or left uninoculated as control (CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–450 · show in text ↑

inoculation · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 34 positive, 8 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

inoculation · molecular: expression · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 38 positive, 9 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

inoculation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

532 papers: 476 positive, 56 negative or no effect

475 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

528 papers more in this group

See all 532 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.