Paper · 2022 · Agricultural Systems

Selected shade tree species improved cocoa yields in low-input agroforestry systems in Ghana

Bismark Kwesi Asitoakor; Philippe Vaast; Anders Ræbild; et al.

10
claims
13
verbatim quotes
48
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Cocoa agroforestry systems differ in the diversity of shade tree species composition. Though cocoa benefits from shade, there is a lack of species-specific information on shade trees that enhance soil fertility and yield. We examined how soil characteristics and cocoa yield were affected by eight commonly retained forest tree species, compared with unshaded control plots over a 3-year period. Using 74 circular plots from 10 cocoa farms in the Western region of Ghana, we sampled soils from two random points within each plot. Soil nutrients at the beginning and end of the study were analyzed, and yield was expressed as number of harvested pods and dry weight of beans per hectare. Levels of soil K and Ca were below recommended values. Although soil available phosphorus (P) was higher in control plots than under shade trees, yield around shade trees were higher than on unshaded plots. Cocoa yield differences between shade tree species and control plots were significant only in the major crop season, but not in the minor crop season. Cocoa yields under Cedrela odorata, Khaya ivorensis, Terminalia superba and Milicia excelsa were significantly higher than on control plots. Hence, the inclusion of specific shade tree species in cocoa agroforestry systems is important to maintain high yields in cocoa systems with low inputs. To our knowledge, this study presents one of the first attempt to assess the impacts of specific shade tree species on soil characteristics and cocoa yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil K and Ca were below recommended values in cocoa farms.

Outcome
soil K and Cae0
Direction
belowe0
Comparator
recommended valuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Levels of soil K and Ca were below recommended values.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–741 · show in text ↑
t0

“cocoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Available soil phosphorus was higher on unshaded control plots than beneath shade trees.

Outcome
soil available phosphorus (P)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
under shade treese0
Setting
control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil available phosphorus (P) was higher in control plots than under shade trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–831 · show in text ↑
t0

“cocoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cocoa yield was higher around shade trees than on unshaded plots.

Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
unshaded plotse0
Setting
around shade treese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield around shade trees were higher than on unshaded plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–892 · show in text ↑
t0

“cocoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade species yield differences versus control were significant only in the major crop season.

Outcome
yield differencese0
Qualifier
only in the major crop seasone0
Comparator
control plotse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cocoa yield differences between shade tree species and control plots were significant only in the major crop season, but not in the minor crop season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1044 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade species yield differences versus control were not significant in the minor crop season.

Outcome
yield differencese0
Qualifier
minor crop seasone0
Comparator
control plotse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cocoa yield differences between shade tree species and control plots were significant only in the major crop season, but not in the minor crop season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1044 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cocoa yield under Cedrela odorata was significantly higher than on control plots.

Interactor
Cedrela odorataCedrela odoratae0other
Outcome
Cocoa yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cedrela odorata
Cedrela odorata · InteractorForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cocoa yields under Cedrela odorata, Khaya ivorensis, Terminalia superba and Milicia excelsa were significantly higher than on control plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1185 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cocoa yield under Khaya ivorensis was significantly higher than on control plots.

Interactor
Khaya ivorensisKhaya ivorensise0other
Outcome
Cocoa yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Khaya ivorensis
Khaya ivorensis · InteractorPandries · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cocoa yields under Cedrela odorata, Khaya ivorensis, Terminalia superba and Milicia excelsa were significantly higher than on control plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1185 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cocoa yield under Terminalia superba was significantly higher than on control plots.

Interactor
Terminalia superbaTerminalia superbae0other
Outcome
Cocoa yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Terminalia superba
Terminalia superba · InteractorOrbicule · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cocoa yields under Cedrela odorata, Khaya ivorensis, Terminalia superba and Milicia excelsa were significantly higher than on control plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1185 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cocoa yield under Milicia excelsa was significantly higher than on control plots.

Interactor
Milicia excelsaMilicia excelsae0other
Outcome
Cocoa yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Milicia excelsa
Milicia excelsa · InteractorFenrith · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cocoa yields under Cedrela odorata, Khaya ivorensis, Terminalia superba and Milicia excelsa were significantly higher than on control plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1185 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend particular shade tree species to maintain high cocoa yields in low input systems.

Outcome
inclusion of specific shade tree speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the inclusion of specific shade tree species in cocoa agroforestry systems is important to maintain high yields in cocoa systems with low inputs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1338 · show in text ↑