Abstract
A .trials was carried out at Borollous site, Kalr EL-Sheikh Governors-ta, North Nile Delta region during the winter seasons of 2063 and 2004, to study the effect of organic and biofertilizers on snap bean plant growth, yield and its components as well as pod quality, under clear polyethylene low tunnels and using iertigation through drip < /p> irrigation system. The results can be summarized as follows: - Vegetative growth i.e., plant height, number of leaves, stern diameter, plant dry weight percentage, number of branches per plant and plant leaf area showed increasing the values towards the use of chicken manure with biotertilizer compared with chemical and compost fertilizers. Application of chicken manure ai the rate oi 3-3 mailed. with bicie. ilizer gave the highest early and total yield of pods than other treatments. Chicken manure treatment plus biofertilizer improved pod content of NP. K. and total sugars. The addition of hictertilizer to the organic manure (compost or chicken manure) enhanced the biological activity of total microbial count i.e., count of nitrogen fixing bacteria, both dehydrogenase and nitrogenase activities and 00; evolution. These results were in comparison with the treatments received organic manure only at the rate of 10 m“: fed'I. Results also revealed that the highest soil bioiogical activity was due to the application of 40 m? chicken manure plus biolertilizer in both tested seasons. Accordingly, this study ensured that the use of organic fertilizers accompanied with biotertilizers was more beneficial than the use of organic fertilizers alone in bopth tested seasons. '
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Chicken manure with biofertilizer increased plant height, number of leaves and stem diameter of snap bean relative to chemical and compost fertilizers.
Verbatim
e1“plant height, number of leaves, stern diameter”
e2“showed increasing the values towards the use of chicken manure with biotertilizer compared with chemical and compost fertilizers”
e3“effect of organic and biofertilizers on snap bean plant growth”
e5“under clear polyethylene low tunnels”
Claim · model-written summary
Chicken manure with biofertilizer increased plant dry weight percentage, number of branches per plant and plant leaf area of snap bean relative to chemical and compost fertilizers.
Verbatim
e2“showed increasing the values towards the use of chicken manure with biotertilizer compared with chemical and compost fertilizers”
e3“effect of organic and biofertilizers on snap bean plant growth”
e5“under clear polyethylene low tunnels”
e6“plant dry weight percentage, number of branches per plant and plant leaf area”
Claim · model-written summary
Chicken manure treatment plus biofertilizer improved pod content of NP, K and total sugars in snap bean.
- Taxon
- snap beane3
- Treatment
- Chicken manure treatment plus biofertilizere4
- Outcome
- pod content of NP. K. and total sugarse4
- Direction
- improvede4
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e3“effect of organic and biofertilizers on snap bean plant growth”
e4“Chicken manure treatment plus biofertilizer improved pod content of NP. K. and total sugars”
Claim · model-written summary
Adding biofertilizer to organic manure increased total microbial count and nitrogen-fixing bacteria count relative to organic manure only.
Verbatim
e3“effect of organic and biofertilizers on snap bean plant growth”
e4“The addition of hictertilizer to the organic manure (compost or chicken manure) enhanced the biological activity of total microbial count i.e., count of nitrogen fixing bacteria”
e5“in comparison with the treatments received organic manure only”
Claim · model-written summary
Adding biofertilizer to organic manure enhanced dehydrogenase and nitrogenase activities relative to organic manure only.
Verbatim
e3“effect of organic and biofertilizers on snap bean plant growth”
e4“The addition of hictertilizer to the organic manure (compost or chicken manure) enhanced the biological activity of total microbial count i.e., count of nitrogen fixing bacteria”
e6“both dehydrogenase and nitrogenase activities”
e5“in comparison with the treatments received organic manure only”
Claim · model-written summary
Chicken manure plus biofertilizer gave the highest soil biological activity in both seasons.
- Taxon
- snap beane3
- Treatment
- chicken manure plus biolertilizere7
- Outcome
- soil bioiogical activitye6
- Direction
- higheste6
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e3“effect of organic and biofertilizers on snap bean plant growth”
e6“the highest soil bioiogical activity was due to the application of”
e7“chicken manure plus biolertilizer in both tested seasons”
Claim · model-written summary
Organic fertilizers accompanied with biofertilizers were more beneficial than organic fertilizers alone.
Verbatim
e3“effect of organic and biofertilizers on snap bean plant growth”
e4“the use of organic fertilizers accompanied with biotertilizers was more beneficial than the use of organic fertilizers alone”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →fertilization · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
120 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
139 papers more in this group
See all 143 papers →fertilization · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
330 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
372 papers more in this group
See all 376 papers →inoculation · quality: sugar starch · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.