Abstract
Field experiment conducted at winter season 2022-2023 on clay sandy soil in Al-Diwanyia. The experiment was design as Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications arranged for split-pilot design, the main treatment included two groups inoculation and non-inoculation within each group four levels of Nano NPK (0, 1, 2, 3) g.L-1 added in two steps (20 and 50) day of plant growth. A sample was taken of soil (30 cm depth) to analysis it and to know its physical and chemical properties. Table (1) phouslus voulgares L were sowing at a rate 25 kg.ha-1 [40 cm between plants (30 cm depth)] at 1/9, after 7 months a sample was taken to measure. The results showed all factors and interactions were significant effect and increased all growth features (plant content of protein, carbohydrates and fats, Dibenzyloxynitrobenzene, Benzoylpentanoic acid, Valylvaline, Grain yield) max values respectively (30.24, 58, 2.637)%, 3.09 2.92, 1.89, 6.86 T.ha-1) come from interaction of Rhizobium inoculation and 3 g.l-1 while the lowest values respectively [(22.41, 52.26, 2.19)%, 0.02, 0.02, 0.02, 4.39 T.ha-1] come from interaction of non-Rhizobium inoculation and 0 g.L-1 Nano NPK level. Keywords: Inoculation, Rhizobium, Fertigation, Common bean, Nano NPK
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium inoculation with 3 g/L Nano NPK gave the maximum plant protein content (30.24), against the lowest value (22.41) with non-inoculation and no Nano NPK.
- Taxon
- COMMON BEAN
Phaseolus vulgarist0 - Treatment
- interaction of Rhizobium inoculation and 3 g.l-1e1
- Outcome
- plant content of proteine1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 30.24e1
- Qualifier
- 22.41e1
- Comparator
- non-Rhizobium inoculation and 0 g.L-1 Nano NPK levele1
- Setting
- Al-Diwanyiae2
RhizobiumOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“RESPONSE OF COMMON BEAN”
e1“The results showed all factors and interactions were significant effect and increased all growth features (plant content of protein, carbohydrates and fats, Dibenzyloxynitrobenzene, Benzoylpentanoic acid, Valylvaline, Grain yield) max values respectively (30.24, 58, 2.637)%, 3.09 2.92, 1.89, 6.86 T.ha-1) come from interaction of Rhizobium inoculation and 3 g.l-1 while the lowest values respectively [(22.41, 52.26, 2.19)%, 0.02, 0.02, 0.02, 4.39 T.ha-1] come from interaction of non-Rhizobium inoculation and 0 g.L-1 Nano NPK level”
e2“Field experiment conducted at winter season 2022-2023 on clay sandy soil in Al-Diwanyia”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium inoculation with 3 g/L Nano NPK gave the maximum plant carbohydrate content (58), against the lowest value (52.26) with non-inoculation and no Nano NPK.
- Taxon
- COMMON BEANPhaseolus vulgarist0
- Treatment
- interaction of Rhizobium inoculation and 3 g.l-1e1
- Outcome
- carbohydratese1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 58e1
- Qualifier
- 52.26e1
- Comparator
- non-Rhizobium inoculation and 0 g.L-1 Nano NPK levele1
- Setting
- Al-Diwanyiae2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“RESPONSE OF COMMON BEAN”
e1“The results showed all factors and interactions were significant effect and increased all growth features (plant content of protein, carbohydrates and fats, Dibenzyloxynitrobenzene, Benzoylpentanoic acid, Valylvaline, Grain yield) max values respectively (30.24, 58, 2.637)%, 3.09 2.92, 1.89, 6.86 T.ha-1) come from interaction of Rhizobium inoculation and 3 g.l-1 while the lowest values respectively [(22.41, 52.26, 2.19)%, 0.02, 0.02, 0.02, 4.39 T.ha-1] come from interaction of non-Rhizobium inoculation and 0 g.L-1 Nano NPK level”
e2“Field experiment conducted at winter season 2022-2023 on clay sandy soil in Al-Diwanyia”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium inoculation with 3 g/L Nano NPK gave the maximum plant fat content (2.637), against the lowest value (2.19) with non-inoculation and no Nano NPK.
- Taxon
- COMMON BEANPhaseolus vulgarist0
- Treatment
- interaction of Rhizobium inoculation and 3 g.l-1e1
- Outcome
- fatse1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 2.637e1
- Qualifier
- 2.19e1
- Comparator
- non-Rhizobium inoculation and 0 g.L-1 Nano NPK levele1
- Setting
- Al-Diwanyiae2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“RESPONSE OF COMMON BEAN”
e1“The results showed all factors and interactions were significant effect and increased all growth features (plant content of protein, carbohydrates and fats, Dibenzyloxynitrobenzene, Benzoylpentanoic acid, Valylvaline, Grain yield) max values respectively (30.24, 58, 2.637)%, 3.09 2.92, 1.89, 6.86 T.ha-1) come from interaction of Rhizobium inoculation and 3 g.l-1 while the lowest values respectively [(22.41, 52.26, 2.19)%, 0.02, 0.02, 0.02, 4.39 T.ha-1] come from interaction of non-Rhizobium inoculation and 0 g.L-1 Nano NPK level”
e2“Field experiment conducted at winter season 2022-2023 on clay sandy soil in Al-Diwanyia”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium inoculation with 3 g/L Nano NPK gave the maximum Dibenzyloxynitrobenzene content (3.09), against the lowest value (0.02) with non-inoculation and no Nano NPK.
- Taxon
- COMMON BEANPhaseolus vulgarist0
- Treatment
- interaction of Rhizobium inoculation and 3 g.l-1e1
- Outcome
- Dibenzyloxynitrobenzenee1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 3.09e1
- Qualifier
- 0.02e1
- Comparator
- non-Rhizobium inoculation and 0 g.L-1 Nano NPK levele1
- Setting
- Al-Diwanyiae2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“RESPONSE OF COMMON BEAN”
e1“The results showed all factors and interactions were significant effect and increased all growth features (plant content of protein, carbohydrates and fats, Dibenzyloxynitrobenzene, Benzoylpentanoic acid, Valylvaline, Grain yield) max values respectively (30.24, 58, 2.637)%, 3.09 2.92, 1.89, 6.86 T.ha-1) come from interaction of Rhizobium inoculation and 3 g.l-1 while the lowest values respectively [(22.41, 52.26, 2.19)%, 0.02, 0.02, 0.02, 4.39 T.ha-1] come from interaction of non-Rhizobium inoculation and 0 g.L-1 Nano NPK level”
e2“Field experiment conducted at winter season 2022-2023 on clay sandy soil in Al-Diwanyia”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium inoculation with 3 g/L Nano NPK gave the maximum Benzoylpentanoic acid content (2.92), against the lowest value (0.02) with non-inoculation and no Nano NPK.
- Taxon
- COMMON BEANPhaseolus vulgarist0
- Treatment
- interaction of Rhizobium inoculation and 3 g.l-1e1
- Outcome
- Benzoylpentanoic acide1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 2.92e1
- Qualifier
- 0.02e1
- Comparator
- non-Rhizobium inoculation and 0 g.L-1 Nano NPK levele1
- Setting
- Al-Diwanyiae2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“RESPONSE OF COMMON BEAN”
e1“The results showed all factors and interactions were significant effect and increased all growth features (plant content of protein, carbohydrates and fats, Dibenzyloxynitrobenzene, Benzoylpentanoic acid, Valylvaline, Grain yield) max values respectively (30.24, 58, 2.637)%, 3.09 2.92, 1.89, 6.86 T.ha-1) come from interaction of Rhizobium inoculation and 3 g.l-1 while the lowest values respectively [(22.41, 52.26, 2.19)%, 0.02, 0.02, 0.02, 4.39 T.ha-1] come from interaction of non-Rhizobium inoculation and 0 g.L-1 Nano NPK level”
e2“Field experiment conducted at winter season 2022-2023 on clay sandy soil in Al-Diwanyia”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium inoculation with 3 g/L Nano NPK gave the maximum Valylvaline content (1.89), against the lowest value (0.02) with non-inoculation and no Nano NPK.
- Taxon
- COMMON BEANPhaseolus vulgarist0
- Treatment
- interaction of Rhizobium inoculation and 3 g.l-1e1
- Outcome
- Valylvalinee1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 1.89e1
- Qualifier
- 0.02e1
- Comparator
- non-Rhizobium inoculation and 0 g.L-1 Nano NPK levele1
- Setting
- Al-Diwanyiae2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“RESPONSE OF COMMON BEAN”
e1“The results showed all factors and interactions were significant effect and increased all growth features (plant content of protein, carbohydrates and fats, Dibenzyloxynitrobenzene, Benzoylpentanoic acid, Valylvaline, Grain yield) max values respectively (30.24, 58, 2.637)%, 3.09 2.92, 1.89, 6.86 T.ha-1) come from interaction of Rhizobium inoculation and 3 g.l-1 while the lowest values respectively [(22.41, 52.26, 2.19)%, 0.02, 0.02, 0.02, 4.39 T.ha-1] come from interaction of non-Rhizobium inoculation and 0 g.L-1 Nano NPK level”
e2“Field experiment conducted at winter season 2022-2023 on clay sandy soil in Al-Diwanyia”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium inoculation with 3 g/L Nano NPK gave the maximum grain yield (6.86 T/ha), against the lowest value (4.39 T/ha) with non-inoculation and no Nano NPK.
- Taxon
- COMMON BEANPhaseolus vulgarist0
- Treatment
- interaction of Rhizobium inoculation and 3 g.l-1e1
- Outcome
- Grain yielde1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 6.86 T.ha-1e1
- Qualifier
- 4.39 T.ha-1e1
- Comparator
- non-Rhizobium inoculation and 0 g.L-1 Nano NPK levele1
- Setting
- Al-Diwanyiae2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“RESPONSE OF COMMON BEAN”
e1“The results showed all factors and interactions were significant effect and increased all growth features (plant content of protein, carbohydrates and fats, Dibenzyloxynitrobenzene, Benzoylpentanoic acid, Valylvaline, Grain yield) max values respectively (30.24, 58, 2.637)%, 3.09 2.92, 1.89, 6.86 T.ha-1) come from interaction of Rhizobium inoculation and 3 g.l-1 while the lowest values respectively [(22.41, 52.26, 2.19)%, 0.02, 0.02, 0.02, 4.39 T.ha-1] come from interaction of non-Rhizobium inoculation and 0 g.L-1 Nano NPK level”
e2“Field experiment conducted at winter season 2022-2023 on clay sandy soil in Al-Diwanyia”
Claim · model-written summary
All factors and their interactions had a significant effect on the growth features of common bean.
- Taxon
- COMMON BEANPhaseolus vulgarist0
- Treatment
- Rhizobium inoculatione1
- Outcome
- growth featurese1
- Setting
- Al-Diwanyiae2
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“RESPONSE OF COMMON BEAN”
e1“The results showed all factors and interactions were significant effect and increased all growth features (plant content of protein, carbohydrates and fats, Dibenzyloxynitrobenzene, Benzoylpentanoic acid, Valylvaline, Grain yield) max values respectively (30.24, 58, 2.637)%, 3.09 2.92, 1.89, 6.86 T.ha-1) come from interaction of Rhizobium inoculation and 3 g.l-1 while the lowest values respectively [(22.41, 52.26, 2.19)%, 0.02, 0.02, 0.02, 4.39 T.ha-1] come from interaction of non-Rhizobium inoculation and 0 g.L-1 Nano NPK level”
e2“Field experiment conducted at winter season 2022-2023 on clay sandy soil in Al-Diwanyia”
The same questions in other papers
Rhizobium · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
34 papers more in this group
See all 38 papers →Rhizobium · quality: protein · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
inoculation · quality: protein · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
152 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
191 papers more in this group
See all 195 papers →inoculation · quality: sugar starch · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.