Paper · 2022 · Antibiotics

Phage Cocktail in Combination with Kasugamycin as a Potential Treatment for Fire Blight Caused by Erwinia amylovora

Sang-Guen Kim; Sung-Bin Lee; Su-Jin Jo; et al.

13
claims
18
verbatim quotes
24
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Recently, there has been an increasing number of blight disease reports associated with Erwinia amylovora and Erwinia pyrifoliae in South Korea. Current management protocols that have been conducted with antibiotics have faced resistance problems and the outbreak has not decreased. Because of this concern, the present study aimed to provide an alternative method to control the invasive fire blight outbreak in the nation using bacteriophages (phages) in combination with an antibiotic agent (kasugamycin). Among 54 phage isolates, we selected five phages, pEa_SNUABM_27, 31, 32, 47, and 48, based on their bacteriolytic efficacy. Although only phage pEa_SNUABM_27 showed host specificity for E. amylovora, all five phages presented complementary lytic potential that improved the host infectivity coverage of each phage All the phages in the cocktail solution could lyse phage-resistant strains. These strains had a decreased tolerance to the antibiotic kasugamycin, and a synergistic effect of phages and antibiotics was demonstrated both in vitro and on immature wound-infected apples. It is noteworthy that the antibacterial effect of the phage cocktail or phage cocktail-sub-minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of kasugamycin was significantly higher than the kasugamycin at the MIC. The selected phages were experimentally stable under environmental factors such as thermal or pH stress. Genomic analysis revealed these are novel Erwinia-infecting phages, and did not encode antibiotic-, virulence-, or lysogenic phage-related genes. In conclusion, we suggest the potential of the phage cocktail and kasugamycin combination as an effective strategy that would minimize the use of antibiotics, which are being excessively used in order to control fire blight pathogens.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five phages were selected for bacteriolytic efficacy among 54 isolates.

Outcome
bacteriolytic efficacye0
Value
five phagese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Among 54 phage isolates, we selected five phages, pEa_SNUABM_27, 31, 32, 47, and 48, based on their bacteriolytic efficacy.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–632 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only pEa_SNUABM_27 showed host specificity for E. amylovora.

Taxon
E. amylovoraErwinia amylovorae0
Outcome
host specificitye0
Qualifier
phage pEa_SNUABM_27e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Erwinia amylovora
Erwinia amylovora · TaxonSebastian Stabinger · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only phage pEa_SNUABM_27 showed host specificity for E. amylovora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–707 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five complementary phages improved host infectivity coverage.

Outcome
host infectivity coveragee0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“all five phages presented complementary lytic potential that improved the host infectivity coverage of each phage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–822 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All cocktail phages lysed phage-resistant strains.

Outcome
lyse phage-resistant strainse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“All the phages in the cocktail solution could lyse phage-resistant strains.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–898 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phage-resistant strains had decreased kasugamycin tolerance.

Treatment
phage-resistant strainse1
Outcome
tolerance to the antibiotic kasugamycine0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“These strains had a decreased tolerance to the antibiotic kasugamycin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–968 · show in text ↑
e1

“phage-resistant strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–897 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phages and kasugamycin acted synergistically in vitro.

Treatment
phages and antibioticse0
Outcome
synergistic effecte0
Qualifier
kasugamycine1
Setting
in vitroe0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“a synergistic effect of phages and antibiotics was demonstrated both in vitro and on immature wound-infected apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1089 · show in text ↑
e1

“antibiotic agent (kasugamycin)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–507 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phages and kasugamycin acted synergistically on wound-infected immature apples.

Organ / stage
immature wound-infected applese0
Treatment
phages and antibioticse0
Interactor
Erwinia amylovoraErwinia amylovorae1pathogen
Outcome
synergistic effecte0
Qualifier
kasugamycine2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Erwinia amylovora
Erwinia amylovora · InteractorSebastian Stabinger · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a synergistic effect of phages and antibiotics was demonstrated both in vitro and on immature wound-infected apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1089 · show in text ↑
e1

“Erwinia amylovora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–105 · show in text ↑
e2

“antibiotic agent (kasugamycin)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–507 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The phage cocktail had a significantly higher antibacterial effect than kasugamycin at MIC.

Treatment
phage cocktaile0
Outcome
antibacterial effecte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
kasugamycin at the MICe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the antibacterial effect of the phage cocktail or phage cocktail-sub-minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of kasugamycin was significantly higher than the kasugamycin at the MIC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1292 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phage cocktail with sub-MIC kasugamycin had a significantly higher antibacterial effect than kasugamycin at MIC.

Treatment
phage cocktail-sub-minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of kasugamycine0
Outcome
antibacterial effecte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
kasugamycin at the MICe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the antibacterial effect of the phage cocktail or phage cocktail-sub-minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of kasugamycin was significantly higher than the kasugamycin at the MIC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1292 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selected phages remained stable under thermal or pH stress.

Outcome
stablee0
Qualifier
thermal or pH stresse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The selected phages were experimentally stable under environmental factors such as thermal or pH stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1398 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genomic analysis identified novel Erwinia-infecting phages.

Outcome
novel Erwinia-infecting phagese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Genomic analysis revealed these are novel Erwinia-infecting phages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1399–1465 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selected phages did not encode antibiotic-, virulence-, or lysogenic phage-related genes.

Outcome
did not encode antibiotic-, virulence-, or lysogenic phage-related genese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“did not encode antibiotic-, virulence-, or lysogenic phage-related genes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1471–1543 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest combined phages and kasugamycin to control fire blight while reducing antibiotic use.

Treatment
phage cocktail and kasugamycin combinatione0
Interactor
fire blight pathogense0pathogen
Outcome
minimize the use of antibioticse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we suggest the potential of the phage cocktail and kasugamycin combination as an effective strategy that would minimize the use of antibiotics, which are being excessively used in order to control fire blight pathogens.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1560–1779 · show in text ↑
e1

“immature wound-infected apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1089 · show in text ↑

antimicrobial agent · Erwinia amylovora · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.