Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during 2018–19 and 2019–20 at the research farm of ICAR-Directorate of Rapeseed-Mustard Research, Bharatpur, Rajasthan to evaluate the effect of organic and inorganic nitrogen sources on yield, water productivity, system productivity and economics of maize (Zea mays L.)-mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern.] cropping system. The experiment was conducted in split-plot design with recommended levels of fertilizers (RDF)/FYM/biofertilizer/mustard straw/Jivamrat in main-plots and recommended doses of nitrogen (RDN) 100, 125 and 150% in sub-plots to maize and Indian mustard and replicated thrice. Application of RDF + FYM @2.5 t/ha + Azotobacter + mustard straw @2.5 t/ha recorded highest SCMR (41.2), leaf area index (4.42), number of siliqua/ plant (440.7), number of seeds/siliqua (18.4), test weight (5.83 g) and seed yield (3.36 t/ha) of mustard. Application of RDN 150% recorded highest physiological and yield attributes and seed yield (3.22 t/ha) of mustard. Results also showed the highest physiological and yield attributes and grain yield (3.73 t/ha) of maize with RDF+FYM @2.5 t/ ha+Azotobacter+mustard straw @2.5 t/ha. System productivity (4.84 t/ha) and water productivity (2.14 kg seed/m3) were found higher with RDF+FYM @2.5 t/ha +Azotobacter+mustard straw @2.5 t/ha and RDN 150%. The highest net monetary return 51715, 81040 and 132755 `/ha and B:C ratio 3.09, 3.22 and 3.15 were recorded for maize, mustard and system with RDF+FYM @2.5 t/ha+Azotobacter+mustard straw @2.5 t/ha and RDN 150%, respectively. Thus, integrated use of RDF+FYM @2.5 t/ha+Azotobacter+mustard straw @2.5 t/ha with RDN @150% improved maize–mustard system yield and profitability under semi-arid climates.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 18
Claim · model-written summary
RDF + FYM, Azotobacter and mustard straw recorded the highest seed yield of mustard (3.36 t/ha).
- Taxon
- Indian mustard
Brassica junceat1
- Treatment
- RDF + FYM @2.5 t/ha + Azotobacter + mustard straw @2.5 t/hae1
- Outcome
- seed yielde1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Value
- 3.36 t/hae1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t1“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”
e1“Application of RDF + FYM @2.5 t/ha + Azotobacter + mustard straw @2.5 t/ha recorded highest SCMR (41.2), leaf area index (4.42), number of siliqua/ plant (440.7), number of seeds/siliqua (18.4), test weight (5.83 g) and seed yield (3.36 t/ha) of mustard”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF + FYM, Azotobacter and mustard straw recorded the highest SCMR (41.2) in mustard.
- Taxon
- Indian mustard
Brassica junceat1
- Treatment
- RDF + FYM @2.5 t/ha + Azotobacter + mustard straw @2.5 t/hae1
- Outcome
- SCMRe1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Value
- 41.2e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t1“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”
e1“Application of RDF + FYM @2.5 t/ha + Azotobacter + mustard straw @2.5 t/ha recorded highest SCMR (41.2), leaf area index (4.42), number of siliqua/ plant (440.7), number of seeds/siliqua (18.4), test weight (5.83 g) and seed yield (3.36 t/ha) of mustard”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF + FYM, Azotobacter and mustard straw recorded the highest leaf area index (4.42) in mustard.
- Taxon
- Indian mustard
Brassica junceat1
- Treatment
- RDF + FYM @2.5 t/ha + Azotobacter + mustard straw @2.5 t/hae1
- Outcome
- leaf area indexe1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Value
- 4.42e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t1“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”
e1“Application of RDF + FYM @2.5 t/ha + Azotobacter + mustard straw @2.5 t/ha recorded highest SCMR (41.2), leaf area index (4.42), number of siliqua/ plant (440.7), number of seeds/siliqua (18.4), test weight (5.83 g) and seed yield (3.36 t/ha) of mustard”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF + FYM, Azotobacter and mustard straw recorded the highest number of siliqua per plant (440.7) in mustard.
- Taxon
- Indian mustard
Brassica junceat1
- Treatment
- RDF + FYM @2.5 t/ha + Azotobacter + mustard straw @2.5 t/hae1
- Outcome
- number of siliqua/ plante1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Value
- 440.7e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t1“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”
e1“Application of RDF + FYM @2.5 t/ha + Azotobacter + mustard straw @2.5 t/ha recorded highest SCMR (41.2), leaf area index (4.42), number of siliqua/ plant (440.7), number of seeds/siliqua (18.4), test weight (5.83 g) and seed yield (3.36 t/ha) of mustard”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF + FYM, Azotobacter and mustard straw recorded the highest number of seeds per siliqua (18.4) in mustard.
- Taxon
- Indian mustard
Brassica junceat1
- Treatment
- RDF + FYM @2.5 t/ha + Azotobacter + mustard straw @2.5 t/hae1
- Outcome
- number of seeds/siliquae1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Value
- 18.4e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t1“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”
e1“Application of RDF + FYM @2.5 t/ha + Azotobacter + mustard straw @2.5 t/ha recorded highest SCMR (41.2), leaf area index (4.42), number of siliqua/ plant (440.7), number of seeds/siliqua (18.4), test weight (5.83 g) and seed yield (3.36 t/ha) of mustard”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF + FYM, Azotobacter and mustard straw recorded the highest test weight (5.83 g) in mustard.
- Taxon
- Indian mustard
Brassica junceat1
- Treatment
- RDF + FYM @2.5 t/ha + Azotobacter + mustard straw @2.5 t/hae1
- Outcome
- test weighte1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Value
- 5.83 ge1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t1“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”
e1“Application of RDF + FYM @2.5 t/ha + Azotobacter + mustard straw @2.5 t/ha recorded highest SCMR (41.2), leaf area index (4.42), number of siliqua/ plant (440.7), number of seeds/siliqua (18.4), test weight (5.83 g) and seed yield (3.36 t/ha) of mustard”
Claim · model-written summary
RDN 150% recorded the highest seed yield of mustard (3.22 t/ha).
- Taxon
- Indian mustard
Brassica junceat1
- Treatment
- RDN 150%e2
- Outcome
- seed yielde2
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 3.22 t/hae2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t1“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”
e2“Application of RDN 150% recorded highest physiological and yield attributes and seed yield (3.22 t/ha) of mustard”
Claim · model-written summary
RDN 150% recorded the highest physiological and yield attributes of mustard.
- Taxon
- Indian mustard
Brassica junceat1
- Treatment
- RDN 150%e2
- Outcome
- physiological and yield attributese2
- Direction
- higheste2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t1“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”
e2“Application of RDN 150% recorded highest physiological and yield attributes and seed yield (3.22 t/ha) of mustard”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF + FYM, Azotobacter and mustard straw recorded the highest grain yield of maize (3.73 t/ha).
- Treatment
- RDF+FYM @2.5 t/ ha+Azotobacter+mustard straw @2.5 t/hae3
- Outcome
- grain yielde3
- Direction
- higheste3
- Value
- 3.73 t/hae3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“maize (Zea mays)”
e3“Results also showed the highest physiological and yield attributes and grain yield (3.73 t/ha) of maize with RDF+FYM @2.5 t/ ha+Azotobacter+mustard straw @2.5 t/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF + FYM, Azotobacter and mustard straw recorded the highest physiological and yield attributes of maize.
- Treatment
- RDF+FYM @2.5 t/ ha+Azotobacter+mustard straw @2.5 t/hae3
- Outcome
- physiological and yield attributese3
- Direction
- higheste3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“maize (Zea mays)”
e3“Results also showed the highest physiological and yield attributes and grain yield (3.73 t/ha) of maize with RDF+FYM @2.5 t/ ha+Azotobacter+mustard straw @2.5 t/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF + FYM with Azotobacter and mustard straw, combined with RDN 150%, raised system productivity to 4.84 t/ha.
- Treatment
- RDF+FYM @2.5 t/ha +Azotobacter+mustard straw @2.5 t/ha and RDN 150%e4
- Outcome
- System productivitye4
- Direction
- highere4
- Value
- 4.84 t/hae4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“maize (Zea mays)”
e4“System productivity (4.84 t/ha) and water productivity (2.14 kg seed/m3) were found higher with RDF+FYM @2.5 t/ha +Azotobacter+mustard straw @2.5 t/ha and RDN 150%”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF + FYM with Azotobacter and mustard straw, combined with RDN 150%, raised water productivity to 2.14 kg seed/m3.
- Treatment
- RDF+FYM @2.5 t/ha +Azotobacter+mustard straw @2.5 t/ha and RDN 150%e4
- Outcome
- water productivitye4
- Direction
- highere4
- Value
- 2.14 kg seed/m3e4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“maize (Zea mays)”
e4“System productivity (4.84 t/ha) and water productivity (2.14 kg seed/m3) were found higher with RDF+FYM @2.5 t/ha +Azotobacter+mustard straw @2.5 t/ha and RDN 150%”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest net monetary return of maize was 51715 (rupees per ha).
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“maize (Zea mays)”
e5“The highest net monetary return 51715, 81040 and 132755”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest net monetary return of mustard was 81040 (rupees per ha).
- Taxon
- Indian mustard
Brassica junceat1
- Outcome
- net monetary returne5
- Direction
- higheste5
- Value
- 81040e5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t1“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”
e5“The highest net monetary return 51715, 81040 and 132755”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest net monetary return of the maize-mustard system was 132755 (rupees per ha).
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“maize (Zea mays)”
e5“The highest net monetary return 51715, 81040 and 132755”
e6“B:C ratio 3.09, 3.22 and 3.15 were recorded for maize, mustard and system”
Claim · model-written summary
The B:C ratio of maize was 3.09 under RDF + FYM with Azotobacter and mustard straw and RDN 150%.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“maize (Zea mays)”
e6“B:C ratio 3.09, 3.22 and 3.15 were recorded for maize, mustard and system”
Claim · model-written summary
The B:C ratio of mustard was 3.22 under RDF + FYM with Azotobacter and mustard straw and RDN 150%.
- Taxon
- Indian mustard
Brassica junceat1
- Outcome
- B:C ratioe6
- Value
- 3.22e6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t1“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”
e6“B:C ratio 3.09, 3.22 and 3.15 were recorded for maize, mustard and system”
Claim · model-written summary
The B:C ratio of the maize-mustard system was 3.15 under RDF + FYM with Azotobacter and mustard straw and RDN 150%.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“maize (Zea mays)”
e6“B:C ratio 3.09, 3.22 and 3.15 were recorded for maize, mustard and system”
The same questions in other papers
Azotobacter · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
57 papers more in this group
See all 61 papers →Azotobacter · quality: grain · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Azotobacter · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Azotobacter · growth · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree
9 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →Azotobacter · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree
20 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →nitrogen · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results differ
62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
61 papers more in this group
See all 65 papers →fertilization · quality: grain · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →nitrogen · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
57 papers more in this group
See all 61 papers →8 of 13 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.