Paper · 2022 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Contemporary nitrogen management in maize (Zea mays)–Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) cropping system for maximizing yield, water productivity and profitability

HAR VIR SINGH; R S JAT; R L CHOUDHARY; et al.

18
claims
37
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 2018–19 and 2019–20 at the research farm of ICAR-Directorate of Rapeseed-Mustard Research, Bharatpur, Rajasthan to evaluate the effect of organic and inorganic nitrogen sources on yield, water productivity, system productivity and economics of maize (Zea mays L.)-mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern.] cropping system. The experiment was conducted in split-plot design with recommended levels of fertilizers (RDF)/FYM/biofertilizer/mustard straw/Jivamrat in main-plots and recommended doses of nitrogen (RDN) 100, 125 and 150% in sub-plots to maize and Indian mustard and replicated thrice. Application of RDF + FYM @2.5 t/ha + Azotobacter + mustard straw @2.5 t/ha recorded highest SCMR (41.2), leaf area index (4.42), number of siliqua/ plant (440.7), number of seeds/siliqua (18.4), test weight (5.83 g) and seed yield (3.36 t/ha) of mustard. Application of RDN 150% recorded highest physiological and yield attributes and seed yield (3.22 t/ha) of mustard. Results also showed the highest physiological and yield attributes and grain yield (3.73 t/ha) of maize with RDF+FYM @2.5 t/ ha+Azotobacter+mustard straw @2.5 t/ha. System productivity (4.84 t/ha) and water productivity (2.14 kg seed/m3) were found higher with RDF+FYM @2.5 t/ha +Azotobacter+mustard straw @2.5 t/ha and RDN 150%. The highest net monetary return 51715, 81040 and 132755 `/ha and B:C ratio 3.09, 3.22 and 3.15 were recorded for maize, mustard and system with RDF+FYM @2.5 t/ha+Azotobacter+mustard straw @2.5 t/ha and RDN 150%, respectively. Thus, integrated use of RDF+FYM @2.5 t/ha+Azotobacter+mustard straw @2.5 t/ha with RDN @150% improved maize–mustard system yield and profitability under semi-arid climates.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF + FYM, Azotobacter and mustard straw recorded the highest seed yield of mustard (3.36 t/ha).

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat1
Treatment
RDF + FYM @2.5 t/ha + Azotobacter + mustard straw @2.5 t/hae1
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
3.36 t/hae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of RDF + FYM @2.5 t/ha + Azotobacter + mustard straw @2.5 t/ha recorded highest SCMR (41.2), leaf area index (4.42), number of siliqua/ plant (440.7), number of seeds/siliqua (18.4), test weight (5.83 g) and seed yield (3.36 t/ha) of mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–884 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF + FYM, Azotobacter and mustard straw recorded the highest SCMR (41.2) in mustard.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat1
Treatment
RDF + FYM @2.5 t/ha + Azotobacter + mustard straw @2.5 t/hae1
Outcome
SCMRe1
Direction
higheste1
Value
41.2e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of RDF + FYM @2.5 t/ha + Azotobacter + mustard straw @2.5 t/ha recorded highest SCMR (41.2), leaf area index (4.42), number of siliqua/ plant (440.7), number of seeds/siliqua (18.4), test weight (5.83 g) and seed yield (3.36 t/ha) of mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–884 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF + FYM, Azotobacter and mustard straw recorded the highest leaf area index (4.42) in mustard.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat1
Treatment
RDF + FYM @2.5 t/ha + Azotobacter + mustard straw @2.5 t/hae1
Outcome
leaf area indexe1
Direction
higheste1
Value
4.42e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of RDF + FYM @2.5 t/ha + Azotobacter + mustard straw @2.5 t/ha recorded highest SCMR (41.2), leaf area index (4.42), number of siliqua/ plant (440.7), number of seeds/siliqua (18.4), test weight (5.83 g) and seed yield (3.36 t/ha) of mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–884 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF + FYM, Azotobacter and mustard straw recorded the highest number of siliqua per plant (440.7) in mustard.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat1
Treatment
RDF + FYM @2.5 t/ha + Azotobacter + mustard straw @2.5 t/hae1
Outcome
number of siliqua/ plante1
Direction
higheste1
Value
440.7e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of RDF + FYM @2.5 t/ha + Azotobacter + mustard straw @2.5 t/ha recorded highest SCMR (41.2), leaf area index (4.42), number of siliqua/ plant (440.7), number of seeds/siliqua (18.4), test weight (5.83 g) and seed yield (3.36 t/ha) of mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–884 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF + FYM, Azotobacter and mustard straw recorded the highest number of seeds per siliqua (18.4) in mustard.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat1
Treatment
RDF + FYM @2.5 t/ha + Azotobacter + mustard straw @2.5 t/hae1
Outcome
number of seeds/siliquae1
Direction
higheste1
Value
18.4e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of RDF + FYM @2.5 t/ha + Azotobacter + mustard straw @2.5 t/ha recorded highest SCMR (41.2), leaf area index (4.42), number of siliqua/ plant (440.7), number of seeds/siliqua (18.4), test weight (5.83 g) and seed yield (3.36 t/ha) of mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–884 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF + FYM, Azotobacter and mustard straw recorded the highest test weight (5.83 g) in mustard.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat1
Treatment
RDF + FYM @2.5 t/ha + Azotobacter + mustard straw @2.5 t/hae1
Outcome
test weighte1
Direction
higheste1
Value
5.83 ge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of RDF + FYM @2.5 t/ha + Azotobacter + mustard straw @2.5 t/ha recorded highest SCMR (41.2), leaf area index (4.42), number of siliqua/ plant (440.7), number of seeds/siliqua (18.4), test weight (5.83 g) and seed yield (3.36 t/ha) of mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–884 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDN 150% recorded the highest seed yield of mustard (3.22 t/ha).

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat1
Treatment
RDN 150%e2
Outcome
seed yielde2
Direction
higheste2
Value
3.22 t/hae2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–85 · show in text ↑
e2

“Application of RDN 150% recorded highest physiological and yield attributes and seed yield (3.22 t/ha) of mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–999 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDN 150% recorded the highest physiological and yield attributes of mustard.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat1
Treatment
RDN 150%e2
Outcome
physiological and yield attributese2
Direction
higheste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–85 · show in text ↑
e2

“Application of RDN 150% recorded highest physiological and yield attributes and seed yield (3.22 t/ha) of mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–999 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF + FYM, Azotobacter and mustard straw recorded the highest grain yield of maize (3.73 t/ha).

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
RDF+FYM @2.5 t/ ha+Azotobacter+mustard straw @2.5 t/hae3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
higheste3
Value
3.73 t/hae3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–52 · show in text ↑
e3

“Results also showed the highest physiological and yield attributes and grain yield (3.73 t/ha) of maize with RDF+FYM @2.5 t/ ha+Azotobacter+mustard straw @2.5 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF + FYM, Azotobacter and mustard straw recorded the highest physiological and yield attributes of maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
RDF+FYM @2.5 t/ ha+Azotobacter+mustard straw @2.5 t/hae3
Outcome
physiological and yield attributese3
Direction
higheste3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–52 · show in text ↑
e3

“Results also showed the highest physiological and yield attributes and grain yield (3.73 t/ha) of maize with RDF+FYM @2.5 t/ ha+Azotobacter+mustard straw @2.5 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF + FYM with Azotobacter and mustard straw, combined with RDN 150%, raised system productivity to 4.84 t/ha.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
RDF+FYM @2.5 t/ha +Azotobacter+mustard straw @2.5 t/ha and RDN 150%e4
Outcome
System productivitye4
Direction
highere4
Value
4.84 t/hae4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–52 · show in text ↑
e4

“System productivity (4.84 t/ha) and water productivity (2.14 kg seed/m3) were found higher with RDF+FYM @2.5 t/ha +Azotobacter+mustard straw @2.5 t/ha and RDN 150%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1329 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF + FYM with Azotobacter and mustard straw, combined with RDN 150%, raised water productivity to 2.14 kg seed/m3.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
RDF+FYM @2.5 t/ha +Azotobacter+mustard straw @2.5 t/ha and RDN 150%e4
Outcome
water productivitye4
Direction
highere4
Value
2.14 kg seed/m3e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–52 · show in text ↑
e4

“System productivity (4.84 t/ha) and water productivity (2.14 kg seed/m3) were found higher with RDF+FYM @2.5 t/ha +Azotobacter+mustard straw @2.5 t/ha and RDN 150%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1329 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest net monetary return of maize was 51715 (rupees per ha).

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
net monetary returne5
Direction
higheste5
Value
51715e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–52 · show in text ↑
e5

“The highest net monetary return 51715, 81040 and 132755”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1386 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest net monetary return of mustard was 81040 (rupees per ha).

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat1
Outcome
net monetary returne5
Direction
higheste5
Value
81040e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–85 · show in text ↑
e5

“The highest net monetary return 51715, 81040 and 132755”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1386 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest net monetary return of the maize-mustard system was 132755 (rupees per ha).

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
net monetary returne5
Direction
higheste5
Value
132755e5
Qualifier
systeme6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–52 · show in text ↑
e5

“The highest net monetary return 51715, 81040 and 132755”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1386 · show in text ↑
e6

“B:C ratio 3.09, 3.22 and 3.15 were recorded for maize, mustard and system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1469 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The B:C ratio of maize was 3.09 under RDF + FYM with Azotobacter and mustard straw and RDN 150%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
B:C ratioe6
Value
3.09e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–52 · show in text ↑
e6

“B:C ratio 3.09, 3.22 and 3.15 were recorded for maize, mustard and system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1469 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The B:C ratio of mustard was 3.22 under RDF + FYM with Azotobacter and mustard straw and RDN 150%.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat1
Outcome
B:C ratioe6
Value
3.22e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–85 · show in text ↑
e6

“B:C ratio 3.09, 3.22 and 3.15 were recorded for maize, mustard and system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1469 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The B:C ratio of the maize-mustard system was 3.15 under RDF + FYM with Azotobacter and mustard straw and RDN 150%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
B:C ratioe6
Value
3.15e6
Qualifier
systeme6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–52 · show in text ↑
e6

“B:C ratio 3.09, 3.22 and 3.15 were recorded for maize, mustard and system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1469 · show in text ↑

Azotobacter · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

61 papers: 57 positive, 4 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Azotobacter · quality: grain · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Azotobacter · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Azotobacter · growth · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Azotobacter · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

21 papers: 21 positive, 0 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results differ

65 papers: 63 positive, 2 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 52 positive, 9 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

8 of 13 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.