Paper · 2019 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Impact of nutrient management system on growth, yield and quality of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) cv. Rani variety

Obida Beenish; Rajesh Singh; Eugenia P Lal

8
claims
37
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at the central Research Field of Sam Higginbottom university of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj during 2016-17 and 2017-18 to study the’’ Impact of nutrient management system on the growth, yield and quality of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L) cv. Rani variety’. The experiment was laid out in a factorial randomized block design with three replications along inorganic, organic and biofertilizers with 10 different treatment combinations. The result of the study revealed that the T6 (50% N through vermicompost + Azotobacter) exhibited significantly higher in plant growth, yield, oil yield and quality parameters viz., Plant height, (cm), Number of primary branches/plant, Number of secondary branches/plant, First flower appearance, 50% flowering DAS and Flower appearance (DAS) Number of Siliquae/plant, Number of seeds/Siliquae 1000-seed weight (g), Seed yield (q/ha), Stover yield (q/ha), Harvest index (%), N content in seed (%), Protein content in seed (%), Protein yield (Kg/ha), Oil content (%), Oil yield (kg/ha), Palmitic acid (%), Stearic acid (%), Oleic acid (%), Linoleic acid (%), Linolenic acid and Arachidic acid. It was also evident from the results that the plant growth, yield, oil yield and quality parameters as recorded by different treatments during 2016-17 were comparatively lower than recorded during 2017-18.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 (50% N through vermicompost + Azotobacter) significantly increased plant height and primary and secondary branches per plant.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
Treatment
50% N through vermicompost + Azotobactere1
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere1symbiont
Outcome
Plant height, (cm), Number of primary branches/plant, Number of secondary branches/plante2
Direction
highere1
Comparator
different treatment combinationse3
Setting
Prayagraje0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) cv. Rani variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted at the central Research Field of Sam Higginbottom university of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj during 2016-17 and 2017-18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–171 · show in text ↑
e1

“the T6 (50% N through vermicompost + Azotobacter) exhibited significantly higher in plant growth, yield, oil yield and quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–666 · show in text ↑
e3

“with 10 different treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–489 · show in text ↑
e2

“Plant height, (cm), Number of primary branches/plant, Number of secondary branches/plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–761 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 significantly increased the number of siliquae per plant, seeds per siliqua and 1000-seed weight.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
Treatment
50% N through vermicompost + Azotobactere1
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere1symbiont
Outcome
Number of Siliquae/plant, Number of seeds/Siliquae 1000-seed weight (g)e2
Direction
highere1
Comparator
different treatment combinationse3
Setting
Prayagraje0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) cv. Rani variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted at the central Research Field of Sam Higginbottom university of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj during 2016-17 and 2017-18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–171 · show in text ↑
e1

“the T6 (50% N through vermicompost + Azotobacter) exhibited significantly higher in plant growth, yield, oil yield and quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–666 · show in text ↑
e3

“with 10 different treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–489 · show in text ↑
e2

“Number of Siliquae/plant, Number of seeds/Siliquae 1000-seed weight (g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 significantly increased seed yield, stover yield and harvest index.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
Treatment
50% N through vermicompost + Azotobactere1
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere1symbiont
Outcome
Seed yield (q/ha), Stover yield (q/ha), Harvest index (%)e2
Direction
highere1
Comparator
different treatment combinationse3
Setting
Prayagraje0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) cv. Rani variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted at the central Research Field of Sam Higginbottom university of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj during 2016-17 and 2017-18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–171 · show in text ↑
e1

“the T6 (50% N through vermicompost + Azotobacter) exhibited significantly higher in plant growth, yield, oil yield and quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–666 · show in text ↑
e3

“with 10 different treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–489 · show in text ↑
e2

“Seed yield (q/ha), Stover yield (q/ha), Harvest index (%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–964 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 significantly increased seed N content, seed protein content and protein yield.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
Treatment
50% N through vermicompost + Azotobactere1
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere1symbiont
Outcome
N content in seed (%), Protein content in seed (%), Protein yield (Kg/ha)e2
Direction
highere1
Comparator
different treatment combinationse3
Setting
Prayagraje0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) cv. Rani variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted at the central Research Field of Sam Higginbottom university of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj during 2016-17 and 2017-18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–171 · show in text ↑
e1

“the T6 (50% N through vermicompost + Azotobacter) exhibited significantly higher in plant growth, yield, oil yield and quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–666 · show in text ↑
e3

“with 10 different treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–489 · show in text ↑
e2

“N content in seed (%), Protein content in seed (%), Protein yield (Kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1039 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 significantly increased seed oil content and oil yield.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
Treatment
50% N through vermicompost + Azotobactere1
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere1symbiont
Outcome
Oil content (%), Oil yield (kg/ha)e2
Direction
highere1
Comparator
different treatment combinationse3
Setting
Prayagraje0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) cv. Rani variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted at the central Research Field of Sam Higginbottom university of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj during 2016-17 and 2017-18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–171 · show in text ↑
e1

“the T6 (50% N through vermicompost + Azotobacter) exhibited significantly higher in plant growth, yield, oil yield and quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–666 · show in text ↑
e3

“with 10 different treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–489 · show in text ↑
e2

“Oil content (%), Oil yield (kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1075 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 significantly increased palmitic, stearic and oleic acid percentages.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
Treatment
50% N through vermicompost + Azotobactere1
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere1symbiont
Outcome
Palmitic acid (%), Stearic acid (%), Oleic acid (%)e2
Direction
highere1
Comparator
different treatment combinationse3
Setting
Prayagraje0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) cv. Rani variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted at the central Research Field of Sam Higginbottom university of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj during 2016-17 and 2017-18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–171 · show in text ↑
e1

“the T6 (50% N through vermicompost + Azotobacter) exhibited significantly higher in plant growth, yield, oil yield and quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–666 · show in text ↑
e3

“with 10 different treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–489 · show in text ↑
e2

“Palmitic acid (%), Stearic acid (%), Oleic acid (%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 significantly increased linoleic, linolenic and arachidic acid percentages.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
Treatment
50% N through vermicompost + Azotobactere1
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere1symbiont
Outcome
Linoleic acid (%), Linolenic acid and Arachidic acide2
Direction
highere1
Comparator
different treatment combinationse3
Setting
Prayagraje0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) cv. Rani variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted at the central Research Field of Sam Higginbottom university of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj during 2016-17 and 2017-18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–171 · show in text ↑
e1

“the T6 (50% N through vermicompost + Azotobacter) exhibited significantly higher in plant growth, yield, oil yield and quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–666 · show in text ↑
e3

“with 10 different treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–489 · show in text ↑
e2

“Linoleic acid (%), Linolenic acid and Arachidic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1182 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant growth, yield, oil yield and quality parameters were lower in 2016-17 than in 2017-18.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
Outcome
plant growth, yield, oil yield and quality parameterse4
Direction
comparatively lowere4
Comparator
recorded during 2017-18e4
Setting
2016-17e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) cv. Rani variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–121 · show in text ↑
e4

“It was also evident from the results that the plant growth, yield, oil yield and quality parameters as recorded by different treatments during 2016-17 were comparatively lower than recorded during 2017-18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1388 · show in text ↑

Azotobacter · quality: protein · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Azotobacter · quality: oil · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Azotobacter · growth · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Azotobacter · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

21 papers: 21 positive, 0 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

fertilization · quality: oil · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 30 positive, 1 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

fertilization · growth · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

73 papers: 66 positive, 7 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

fertilization · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

139 papers: 138 positive, 1 negative or no effect

137 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

135 papers more in this group

See all 139 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.