Abstract
A field experiment was conducted on loamy sand soil during rabi 2009-10 to find out the effect of integrated nutrient management on performance of Indian mustard. Results revealed that different fertility levels had significant effect on all the growth parameters (plant height and dry matter accumulation per plant), yield attributes (number of branches per plant, siliquae per plant, seeds per siliqua and test weight), yield (seed and stover) and net returns of mustard. The maximum values of these parameters were recorded under application of 75% RDF through FYM+25% through fertilizers being at par with 50% RDF through FYM+50% through fertilizers except stover yield which was at par with 100% RDF through FYM significantly superior to rest of the treatments. Results further indicated that dual inoculation with Azotobacter+PSB significantly increased plant height, dry matter accumulation per plant, number of branches per plant, siliquae per plant, seeds per siliqua, test weight, seed and stover yield and net returns over control.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Fertility levels significantly affected mustard growth, yield attributes, yield and net returns.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“different fertility levels had significant effect on all the growth parameters (plant height and dry matter accumulation per plant), yield attributes (number of branches per plant, siliquae per plant, seeds per siliqua and test weight), yield (seed and stover) and net returns of mustard”
Claim · model-written summary
The 75% RDF through FYM plus 25% fertilizer treatment gave maximum growth, yield and returns, generally on par with equal FYM and fertilizer portions.
- Taxon
- Brassica juncea
Brassica junceat0 - Treatment
- 75% RDF through FYM+25% through fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- these parameterse0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Qualifier
- except stover yield which was at par with 100% RDF through FYMe0
- Comparator
- 50% RDF through FYM+50% through fertilizerse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum values of these parameters were recorded under application of 75% RDF through FYM+25% through fertilizers being at par with 50% RDF through FYM+50% through fertilizers except stover yield which was at par with 100% RDF through FYM”
t0“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”
Claim · model-written summary
Dual Azotobacter plus PSB inoculation significantly increased growth, yield attributes, seed and stover yields and net returns over control.
- Taxon
- Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
- Treatment
- dual inoculation with Azotobacter+PSBe0
- Interactor
- Azotobacter
Azotobactere0symbiont - Second interactor
- PSBe0symbiont
- Outcome
- plant height, dry matter accumulation per plante0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“dual inoculation with Azotobacter+PSB significantly increased plant height, dry matter accumulation per plant, number of branches per plant, siliquae per plant, seeds per siliqua, test weight, seed and stover yield and net returns over control”
t0“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”
The same questions in other papers
Azotobacter · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree
20 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →inoculation · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.