Paper · 2022 · Environmental Pollution

Using DMPP with cattle manure can mitigate yield-scaled global warming potential under low rainfall conditions

Guillermo Guardia; Diego Abalos; Noemí Mateo-Marín; et al.

18
claims
38
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Organic fertilisers can reduce the carbon (C) footprint from croplands, but adequate management strategies such as the use of nitrification inhibitors are required to minimise side-effects on nitrogen (N) losses to the atmosphere or waterbodies. This could be particularly important in a context on changing rainfall patterns due to climate change. A lysimeter experiment with maize (Zea mays L.) was set up on a coarse sandy soil to evaluate the efficacy of 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP) to mitigate nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions, nitrate (NO3−) leaching losses and net global warming potential from manure, with (R+) and without (R-) simulated rainfall events. Soil water availability was a limiting factor for plant growth and microbial processes due to low rainfall during the growing season. Nitrification was effectively inhibited by DMPP, decreasing topsoil NO3− concentrations by 28% on average and cumulative N2O losses by 82%. Most of the N2O was emitted during the growing season, with annual emission factors of 0.07% and 0.95% for manure with and without DMPP, respectively. Cumulative N2O emissions were 40% higher in R-compared to R+, possibly because of the higher topsoil NO3− concentrations. There was no effect of DMPP or rainfall amount on annual NO3− leaching losses, which corresponded to 12% of manure-N and were mainly driven by the post-harvest period. DMPP did not affect yield or N use efficiency (NUE) while R-caused severe reductions on biomass and NUE. We conclude that dry growing seasons can jeopardize crop production while concurrently increasing greenhouse gas emissions from a sandy soil. The use of nitrification inhibitors is strongly recommended under these conditions to address the climate change impacts.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low rainfall limited plant growth and microbial processes through soil water availability.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Outcome
plant growth and microbial processese1
Qualifier
low rainfall during the growing seasone1
Setting
coarse sandy soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A lysimeter experiment with maize (Zea mays L.) was set up on a coarse sandy soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–430 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soil water availability was a limiting factor for plant growth and microbial processes due to low rainfall during the growing season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–804 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DMPP inhibited nitrification.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Treatment
DMPPe1
Outcome
Nitrificatione1
Direction
inhibitede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A lysimeter experiment with maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–396 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrification was effectively inhibited by DMPP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–852 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DMPP reduced topsoil nitrate concentration by 28% on average.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Treatment
DMPPe2
Outcome
topsoil NO3− concentrationse1
Direction
decreasinge1
Value
28%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A lysimeter experiment with maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–396 · show in text ↑
e1

“decreasing topsoil NO3− concentrations by 28% on average”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–910 · show in text ↑
e2

“Nitrification was effectively inhibited by DMPP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–852 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DMPP reduced cumulative N2O losses by 82%.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Treatment
DMPPe0
Outcome
cumulative N2O lossese1
Direction
decreasinge2
Value
82%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A lysimeter experiment with maize (Zea mays L.) was set up on a coarse sandy soil to evaluate the efficacy of 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–496 · show in text ↑
e1

“cumulative N2O losses by 82%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–943 · show in text ↑
e2

“Nitrification was effectively inhibited by DMPP, decreasing topsoil NO3− concentrations by 28% on average and cumulative N2O losses by 82%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–944 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most N2O emissions occurred during the growing season.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Outcome
N2O was emitted during the growing seasone1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A lysimeter experiment with maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–396 · show in text ↑
e1

“Most of the N2O was emitted during the growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–998 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The annual emission factor was 0.07% for manure with DMPP.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Treatment
DMPPe1
Outcome
annual emission factorse1
Direction
lowerinferrede1
Value
0.07%e1
Comparator
without DMPPe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A lysimeter experiment with maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–396 · show in text ↑
e1

“annual emission factors of 0.07% and 0.95% for manure with and without DMPP, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1094 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The annual emission factor was 0.95% for manure without DMPP.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Treatment
without DMPPe1
Outcome
annual emission factorse1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
0.95%e1
Comparator
manure withe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A lysimeter experiment with maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–396 · show in text ↑
e1

“annual emission factors of 0.07% and 0.95% for manure with and without DMPP, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1094 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cumulative N2O emissions were 40% higher under lower rainfall than under added rainfall.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Treatment
R-e1
Outcome
Cumulative N2O emissionse1
Direction
highere1
Value
40%e1
Qualifier
possibly because of the higher topsoil NO3− concentrationse1
Comparator
R+e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A lysimeter experiment with maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–396 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cumulative N2O emissions were 40% higher in R-compared to R+, possibly because of the higher topsoil NO3− concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1217 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DMPP had no reported effect on annual nitrate leaching losses.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Treatment
DMPPe1
Outcome
annual NO3− leaching lossese1
Direction
no effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A lysimeter experiment with maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–396 · show in text ↑
e1

“There was no effect of DMPP or rainfall amount on annual NO3− leaching losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1295 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainfall amount had no reported effect on annual nitrate leaching losses.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Treatment
rainfall amounte1
Outcome
annual NO3− leaching lossese1
Direction
no effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A lysimeter experiment with maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–396 · show in text ↑
e1

“There was no effect of DMPP or rainfall amount on annual NO3− leaching losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1295 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual nitrate leaching losses corresponded to 12% of manure nitrogen.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Outcome
annual NO3− leaching lossese1
Value
12% of manure-Ne1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A lysimeter experiment with maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–396 · show in text ↑
e1

“annual NO3− leaching losses, which corresponded to 12% of manure-N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1334 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual nitrate leaching losses were mainly driven by the post-harvest period.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Outcome
annual NO3− leaching lossese1
Qualifier
post-harvest periode1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A lysimeter experiment with maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–396 · show in text ↑
e1

“annual NO3− leaching losses, which corresponded to 12% of manure-N and were mainly driven by the post-harvest period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1384 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DMPP did not affect maize yield.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Treatment
DMPPe1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
did not affecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A lysimeter experiment with maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–396 · show in text ↑
e1

“DMPP did not affect yield or N use efficiency (NUE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1386–1437 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DMPP did not affect nitrogen use efficiency.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Treatment
DMPPe1
Outcome
N use efficiency (NUE)e1
Direction
did not affecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A lysimeter experiment with maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–396 · show in text ↑
e1

“DMPP did not affect yield or N use efficiency (NUE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1386–1437 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low rainfall severely reduced maize biomass.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Treatment
R-e0
Outcome
biomasse1
Direction
severe reductionse1
Comparator
R+e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A lysimeter experiment with maize (Zea mays L.) was set up on a coarse sandy soil to evaluate the efficacy of 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP) to mitigate nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions, nitrate (NO3−) leaching losses and net global warming potential from manure, with (R+) and without (R-) simulated rainfall events.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–670 · show in text ↑
e1

“R-caused severe reductions on biomass and NUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1489 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low rainfall severely reduced maize nitrogen use efficiency.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Treatment
R-e0
Outcome
NUEe1
Direction
severe reductionse1
Comparator
R+e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A lysimeter experiment with maize (Zea mays L.) was set up on a coarse sandy soil to evaluate the efficacy of 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP) to mitigate nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions, nitrate (NO3−) leaching losses and net global warming potential from manure, with (R+) and without (R-) simulated rainfall events.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–670 · show in text ↑
e1

“R-caused severe reductions on biomass and NUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1489 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that dry growing seasons can jeopardize crop production while increasing greenhouse gas emissions.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Outcome
crop productione1
Direction
jeopardizee1
Setting
sandy soile1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A lysimeter experiment with maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–396 · show in text ↑
e1

“dry growing seasons can jeopardize crop production while concurrently increasing greenhouse gas emissions from a sandy soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1508–1631 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend nitrification inhibitors under dry conditions to address climate impacts.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Outcome
use of nitrification inhibitorse1
Qualifier
under these conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A lysimeter experiment with maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–396 · show in text ↑
e1

“The use of nitrification inhibitors is strongly recommended under these conditions to address the climate change impacts.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1633–1754 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 26 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

627 papers: 549 positive, 78 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 549 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

623 papers more in this group

See all 627 papers →

rainfall · environment: emissions · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

phosphorus · environment: emissions · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.