Paper · 2022 · Horticulturae

Biodegradable Recycled Paper Mulch Reduces Strawberry Water Consumption and Crop Coefficient

João Pedro Pinto; Fernando França da Cunha; Gustavo Henrique da Silva; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Mulching with recycled paper has the potential to be used in agricultural production and can be adopted in strawberry cultivation. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the agronomic characteristics, water consumption and technical coefficients of strawberry cultivated with recycled paper as mulch. The treatments consisted of strawberry cultivation in lysimeters with recycled paper mulch and without soil cover. The recycled paper used was 187 μm-thick. The irrigation system was installed with drippers whose flow rate was 2 L h−1. Strawberry irrigation requirements were 317 and 394 mm, with and without mulch, respectively. Mulching with recycled paper did not have a significant effect on the average number of fruits, fresh fruit mass, fruit waste per plant, average fruit yield and water productivity. In relation to the technical coefficients, maximum values of the evaporation coefficient (Ke) of 0.40 (calculated with the evapotranspiration of the grass—L) and 0.28 (calculated with the Penman–Monteith ETo—PM) were obtained for OPM. The Kc values for the initial and full development stages were 0.31 and 0.84 (L) and 0.24 and 0.66 (PM), respectively. NDVI can be used to estimate strawberry Kc values. Recycled paper as mulch reduces the water consumption of strawberry crops and does not alter the agronomic characteristics.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Recycled paper mulch did not significantly change the average number of fruits, fresh fruit mass or fruit waste per plant

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
recycled paper mulche0
Outcome
average number of fruits, fresh fruit mass, fruit waste per plante1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Comparator
without soil covere0
Setting
lysimeterse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments consisted of strawberry cultivation in lysimeters with recycled paper mulch and without soil cover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–430 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mulching with recycled paper did not have a significant effect on the average number of fruits, fresh fruit mass, fruit waste per plant, average fruit yield and water productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–826 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Recycled paper mulch did not significantly change average fruit yield or water productivity

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
recycled paper mulche0
Outcome
average fruit yield and water productivitye1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Comparator
without soil covere0
Setting
lysimeterse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments consisted of strawberry cultivation in lysimeters with recycled paper mulch and without soil cover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–430 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mulching with recycled paper did not have a significant effect on the average number of fruits, fresh fruit mass, fruit waste per plant, average fruit yield and water productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–826 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strawberry irrigation requirement was lower with recycled paper mulch (317 mm) than without mulch (394 mm)

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
recycled paper mulche0
Outcome
irrigation requirementse2
Direction
lowerinferrede2
Value
317 and 394 mme2
Comparator
without mulche2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments consisted of strawberry cultivation in lysimeters with recycled paper mulch and without soil cover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–430 · show in text ↑
e2

“Strawberry irrigation requirements were 317 and 394 mm, with and without mulch, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–645 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum evaporation coefficient (Ke) of strawberry was 0.40 when calculated with the grass evapotranspiration

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae5
Outcome
maximum values of the evaporation coefficient (Ke)e3
Value
0.40e3
Qualifier
calculated with the evapotranspiration of the grasse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“technical coefficients of strawberry cultivated with recycled paper as mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–315 · show in text ↑
e3

“maximum values of the evaporation coefficient (Ke) of 0.40 (calculated with the evapotranspiration of the grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–982 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum evaporation coefficient (Ke) of strawberry was 0.28 when calculated with the Penman-Monteith ETo

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae5
Outcome
maximum values of the evaporation coefficient (Ke)e3
Value
0.28e4
Qualifier
calculated with the Penmane4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“technical coefficients of strawberry cultivated with recycled paper as mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–315 · show in text ↑
e3

“maximum values of the evaporation coefficient (Ke) of 0.40 (calculated with the evapotranspiration of the grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–982 · show in text ↑
e4

“and 0.28 (calculated with the Penman”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1022 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The initial-stage Kc of strawberry was 0.31 when calculated with grass evapotranspiration

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae5
Organ / stage
initiale6
Outcome
Kc valuese6
Value
0.31e6
Qualifier
(L)e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“technical coefficients of strawberry cultivated with recycled paper as mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–315 · show in text ↑
e6

“The Kc values for the initial and full development stages were 0.31 and 0.84 (L) and 0.24 and 0.66 (PM), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1180 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The full-development-stage Kc of strawberry was 0.84 when calculated with grass evapotranspiration

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae5
Organ / stage
full development stagese6
Outcome
Kc valuese6
Value
0.84e6
Qualifier
(L)e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“technical coefficients of strawberry cultivated with recycled paper as mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–315 · show in text ↑
e6

“The Kc values for the initial and full development stages were 0.31 and 0.84 (L) and 0.24 and 0.66 (PM), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1180 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The initial-stage Kc of strawberry was 0.24 when calculated with Penman-Monteith ETo

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae5
Organ / stage
initiale6
Outcome
Kc valuese6
Value
0.24e6
Qualifier
(PM)e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“technical coefficients of strawberry cultivated with recycled paper as mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–315 · show in text ↑
e6

“The Kc values for the initial and full development stages were 0.31 and 0.84 (L) and 0.24 and 0.66 (PM), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1180 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The full-development-stage Kc of strawberry was 0.66 when calculated with Penman-Monteith ETo

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae5
Organ / stage
full development stagese6
Outcome
Kc valuese6
Value
0.66e6
Qualifier
(PM)e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“technical coefficients of strawberry cultivated with recycled paper as mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–315 · show in text ↑
e6

“The Kc values for the initial and full development stages were 0.31 and 0.84 (L) and 0.24 and 0.66 (PM), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1180 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

NDVI can be used to estimate strawberry Kc values

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae7
Outcome
estimate strawberry Kc valuese7
Qualifier
NDVIe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“NDVI can be used to estimate strawberry Kc values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1231 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

97 papers: 78 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 78 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

mulching · physiology: water · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.