Paper · 2022 · Journal of Crop production and processing

The Response of Morphological and Physiological Traits and Grain Yield of Corn to Planting Method and Sugarcane Residue Compost

Tahmasebi, M.; Gharineh, M. H.; Moshatati, A.; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

In order to investigate the effect of planting method and sugarcane residue compost fertilizer on morphological and physiological traits and grain yield of corn, a field experiment using a split-plot arrangement was accomplished in a randomized complete block design with four replicates in Mian-Ab, Shooshtar, south-west Iran in summer 2018. Experimental factors included four planting methods (on ridges, on watermark, in furrows, and on flat ground) as main factor in main plots and four amounts of sugarcane residues compost (0, 10, 20, and 30 t ha-1) in sub-plots. Results showed that the effects of planting method, sugarcane residue compost, and their interaction were significant on the leaf area index, plant height, ear height, SPAD, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll, grains/ear, thousand grain weight and grain yield. Mean comparison showed that the maximum amount of the examined corn traits was obtained in furrow planting and using 30 t ha-1 of sugarcane residue compost and the lowest amounts were observed in ridge planting and absence of sugarcane residue compost. The highest grain yield (6497 kg ha-1) was achieved in furrow planting and presence of 30 t ha-1 of sugarcane residue compost and the lowest grain yield (3870 kg ha-1) was in ridge planting and absence of sugarcane residue compost. In general, it seems that furrow planting by providing better growth conditions and consumption of sugarcane residues compost fertilizer due perhaps to improvement in soil nutrient availability and moisture storage capacity increase the growth and grain yield of corn in Shooshtar region.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting method, compost and their interaction significantly affected corn leaf area index, plant height and ear height.

Treatment
planting method, sugarcane residue compost, and their interactione0
Outcome
leaf area index, plant height, ear heighte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effects of planting method, sugarcane residue compost, and their interaction were significant on the leaf area index, plant height, ear height, SPAD, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll, grains/ear, thousand grain weight and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–842 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 74–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting method, compost and their interaction significantly affected SPAD and chlorophyll measures.

Treatment
planting method, sugarcane residue compost, and their interactione0
Outcome
SPAD, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophylle0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effects of planting method, sugarcane residue compost, and their interaction were significant on the leaf area index, plant height, ear height, SPAD, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll, grains/ear, thousand grain weight and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–842 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 74–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting method, compost and their interaction significantly affected grains per ear, thousand grain weight and grain yield.

Treatment
planting method, sugarcane residue compost, and their interactione0
Outcome
grains/ear, thousand grain weight and grain yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effects of planting method, sugarcane residue compost, and their interaction were significant on the leaf area index, plant height, ear height, SPAD, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll, grains/ear, thousand grain weight and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–842 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 74–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Examined corn traits were maximal with furrow planting and 30 t ha-1 compost and lowest with ridge planting and no compost.

Treatment
furrow planting and using 30 t ha-1 of sugarcane residue composte0
Outcome
examined corn traitse0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
ridge planting and absence of sugarcane residue composte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum amount of the examined corn traits was obtained in furrow planting and using 30 t ha-1 of sugarcane residue compost and the lowest amounts were observed in ridge planting and absence of sugarcane residue compost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–1095 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 74–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield reached 6497 kg ha-1 with furrow planting and 30 t ha-1 compost.

Treatment
furrow planting and presence of 30 t ha-1 of sugarcane residue composte0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
6497 kg ha-1e0
Qualifier
3870 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
ridge planting and absence of sugarcane residue composte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield (6497 kg ha-1) was achieved in furrow planting and presence of 30 t ha-1 of sugarcane residue compost and the lowest grain yield (3870 kg ha-1) was in ridge planting and absence of sugarcane residue compost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1327 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 74–78 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Furrow planting and sugarcane residue compost appear to increase corn growth and grain yield in Shooshtar.

Treatment
furrow plantinge0
Outcome
growth and grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
improvement in soil nutrient availability and moisture storage capacitye0
Setting
Shooshtar regione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“furrow planting by providing better growth conditions and consumption of sugarcane residues compost fertilizer due perhaps to improvement in soil nutrient availability and moisture storage capacity increase the growth and grain yield of corn in Shooshtar region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1355–1616 · show in text ↑

fertilization · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

162 papers: 137 positive, 25 negative or no effect

136 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

158 papers more in this group

See all 162 papers →

irrigation · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 19 positive, 13 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

irrigation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,016 papers: 791 positive, 225 negative or no effect

790 papers in the same direction as this paper · 209 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1,012 papers more in this group

See all 1,016 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.