Paper · 2023 · Agronomy

Drought Tolerance of Mungbean Is Improved by Foliar Spray of Nanoceria

Djanaguiraman Maduraimuthu; Senthil Alagarswamy; Jeyakumar Prabhakaran; et al.

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
13
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In crops, drought stress reduces the photosynthetic rate and gamete function through oxidative damage. Earlier studies showed that nanoceria possesses an antioxidant property; however, the ability of nanoceria to alleviate drought-stress-stimulated oxidative damage in pulse crops has not been studied. Therefore, experiments were conducted to assess the impacts of nanoceria on drought-induced oxidative damage in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. We hypothesize that foliar application of nanoceria under drought stress can scavenge the excess produced reactive oxygen species (ROS) due to its inherent properties which could result in increased photosynthesis and reproductive success of mungbean. Three experiments were conducted under well-watered and limited-moisture conditions. The traits associated with oxidative damage, photosynthesis, reproductive success, and yield were recorded. Results showed that for mungbean, the optimum concentration of nanoceria for foliar spray was 100 mg L−1. Field and pot culture experiments showed that foliar application of nanoceria under drought decreased the superoxide radical content (29%), hydrogen peroxide content (28%), and membrane damage (35%) over water spray. Nanoceria increased the photosynthetic rate (38%), pod-set percentage (16%), and seed weight m−2 (44%) in drought-stressed plants compared to control plants. The increased photosynthetic rate by nanoceria spray under drought stress is associated with lesser oxidative damage and stomatal limitation caused by nanoceria’s inherent ROS-scavenging ability. Hence, foliar application of nanoceria at the rate of 100 mg L−1 under drought stress could increase mungbean seed yield per plant through increased photosynthetic rate and pod-set percentage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimum nanoceria concentration for mungbean foliar spray was 100 mg L−1.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Outcome
optimum concentratione0
Value
100 mg L−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that for mungbean, the optimum concentration of nanoceria for foliar spray was 100 mg L−1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1004 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoceria foliar application under drought decreased superoxide radical content by 29% relative to water spray.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
foliar application of nanoceria under droughte0
Outcome
superoxide radical contente0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
29%e0
Comparator
water spraye0
Setting
Field and pot culture experimentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field and pot culture experiments showed that foliar application of nanoceria under drought decreased the superoxide radical content (29%), hydrogen peroxide content (28%), and membrane damage (35%) over water spray.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1221 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoceria foliar application under drought decreased hydrogen peroxide content by 28% relative to water spray.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
foliar application of nanoceria under droughte0
Outcome
hydrogen peroxide contente0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
28%e0
Comparator
water spraye0
Setting
Field and pot culture experimentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field and pot culture experiments showed that foliar application of nanoceria under drought decreased the superoxide radical content (29%), hydrogen peroxide content (28%), and membrane damage (35%) over water spray.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1221 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoceria foliar application under drought decreased membrane damage by 35% relative to water spray.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
foliar application of nanoceria under droughte0
Outcome
membrane damagee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
35%e0
Comparator
water spraye0
Setting
Field and pot culture experimentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field and pot culture experiments showed that foliar application of nanoceria under drought decreased the superoxide radical content (29%), hydrogen peroxide content (28%), and membrane damage (35%) over water spray.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1221 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoceria increased photosynthetic rate by 38% in drought-stressed mungbean compared with control plants.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Nanoceriae0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
38%e0
Qualifier
drought-stressed plantse0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nanoceria increased the photosynthetic rate (38%), pod-set percentage (16%), and seed weight m−2 (44%) in drought-stressed plants compared to control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1379 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoceria increased pod-set percentage by 16% in drought-stressed mungbean compared with control plants.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Nanoceriae0
Outcome
pod-set percentagee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
16%e0
Qualifier
drought-stressed plantse0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nanoceria increased the photosynthetic rate (38%), pod-set percentage (16%), and seed weight m−2 (44%) in drought-stressed plants compared to control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1379 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoceria increased seed weight m−2 by 44% in drought-stressed mungbean compared with control plants.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Nanoceriae0
Outcome
seed weight m−2e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
44%e0
Qualifier
drought-stressed plantse0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nanoceria increased the photosynthetic rate (38%), pod-set percentage (16%), and seed weight m−2 (44%) in drought-stressed plants compared to control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1379 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–29 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The increased photosynthetic rate with nanoceria under drought was associated with less oxidative damage and stomatal limitation.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
nanoceria spraye0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
lesser oxidative damage and stomatal limitatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increased photosynthetic rate by nanoceria spray under drought stress is associated with lesser oxidative damage and stomatal limitation caused by nanoceria’s inherent ROS-scavenging ability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1575 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–29 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that foliar nanoceria at 100 mg L−1 under drought could increase mungbean seed yield per plant.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
foliar application of nanoceria at the rate of 100 mg L−1 under drought stresse0
Outcome
mungbean seed yield per plante0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hence, foliar application of nanoceria at the rate of 100 mg L−1 under drought stress could increase mungbean seed yield per plant through increased photosynthetic rate and pod-set percentage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1576–1768 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: oxidative · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 2 positive, 8 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: photosynthesis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: oxidative · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · physiology: oxidative · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

26 papers: 26 positive, 0 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.