Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Sustainable Development and Science

Effect of some anti-stress compounds on growth and production of tomato plants grown in winter season

Ahmed Mohamed; Samar Halawa; Abd El-Baset; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This investigation was achieved at the two successive winter seasons of 2020 /2021 and 2021/2022 in the Experimental Station of the Hort.Dept., of Agric.Fac., Benha Univ. to examine the influence of antistress compounds, i.e., lithovit (0.5 g\ L), fulvic acid (1.0 g\ L) and potassium silicate (2.0 g\ L) as foliage spray on vegetative growth, nutrients content, yield and fruit quality for both hybrids,.i.e., Super gold and Super streen of tomato cultivars grown under low tunnels covered with mesh (65%).Results indicated that tomato plants derived from Super gold F1 exceeded significantly those derived from Super streen in both seasons regarding plant height, leaves area, branches No., leaves No. and fresh as well as dry weight per plant, N, P, K percentages, total chlorophyll, total proline, fruit set, and consequently total yield with better quality of fruits regarding T.S.S. percentage, total yield, firmness and vit.C. In this respect foliar spraying Super gold F1 cultivar by potassium silicate at 2 g/l three times started after 30 days from transplanting and every 15 days as intervals recorded the highest values of plant height, branches No. and leaves No., leaves area, fresh and dry weight per plant as well as N%, P%, K%, total chlorophyll and proline, fruit set, T.S.S., total yield, firmness and vit.C. in comparison with the other treatments.Contrarily, using Super streen and spraying with tap water recorded the least values of the aforementioned characters, meanwhile using fulvic acid at 1g/l or lithovit Co2 at 0.5 g/l as foliar sprays on Super gold cultivar came in between in this respect during both seasons.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Super gold F1 exceeded Super streen significantly in plant growth traits in both seasons.

Material
Super gold F1e0
Outcome
plant height, leaves area, branches No.e0
Direction
exceedede0
Qualifier
both seasonse0
Comparator
Super streene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“Super gold F1 exceeded significantly those derived from Super streen in both seasons regarding plant height, leaves area, branches No., leaves No. and fresh as well as dry weight per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–745 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Super gold F1 exceeded Super streen significantly in nutrient and physiological measures.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicumt0
Material
Super gold F1e0
Outcome
N, P, K percentagese0
Direction
exceedede0
Comparator
Super streene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“Super gold F1 exceeded significantly those derived from Super streen in both seasons regarding plant height, leaves area, branches No., leaves No. and fresh as well as dry weight per plant, N, P, K percentages, total chlorophyll, total proline”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–800 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Super gold F1 exceeded Super streen significantly in fruit set and total yield.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicumt0
Outcome
fruit set, and consequently total yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“fruit set, and consequently total yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–841 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Super gold F1 produced better fruit quality than Super streen.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicumt0
Outcome
quality of fruits regarding T.S.S. percentagee0
Direction
bettere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“better quality of fruits regarding T.S.S. percentage, total yield, firmness and vit.C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–933 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium silicate spraying on Super gold F1 recorded the highest growth traits relative to other treatments.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicumt0
Material
Super gold F1e0
Treatment
potassium silicate at 2 g/le0
Outcome
plant height, branches No. and leaves No.e0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“foliar spraying Super gold F1 cultivar by potassium silicate at 2 g/l three times started after 30 days from transplanting and every 15 days as intervals recorded the highest values of plant height, branches No. and leaves No., leaves area, fresh and dry weight per plant as well as N%, P%, K%, total chlorophyll and proline, fruit set, T.S.S., total yield, firmness and vit.C. in comparison with the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1367 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium silicate spraying on Super gold F1 recorded the highest nutrient and physiological indicators.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
potassium silicate at 2 g/le0
Outcome
N%, P%, K%e0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“potassium silicate at 2 g/l three times started after 30 days from transplanting and every 15 days as intervals recorded the highest values of plant height, branches No. and leaves No., leaves area, fresh and dry weight per plant as well as N%, P%, K%, total chlorophyll and proline, fruit set, T.S.S., total yield, firmness and vit.C. in comparison with the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1367 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium silicate spraying on Super gold F1 recorded the highest fruit and yield measures.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
potassium silicate at 2 g/le0
Outcome
fruit set, T.S.S., total yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“potassium silicate at 2 g/l three times started after 30 days from transplanting and every 15 days as intervals recorded the highest values of plant height, branches No. and leaves No., leaves area, fresh and dry weight per plant as well as N%, P%, K%, total chlorophyll and proline, fruit set, T.S.S., total yield, firmness and vit.C. in comparison with the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1367 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Super streen sprayed with tap water recorded the least values of the measured traits.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicumt0
Material
Super streene0
Treatment
spraying with tap watere0
Outcome
aforementioned characterse0
Direction
leaste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“using Super streen and spraying with tap water recorded the least values of the aforementioned characters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1485 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fulvic acid spraying on Super gold produced intermediate trait values.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicumt0
Material
Super golde0
Treatment
fulvic acid at 1g/le0
Outcome
came in betweene0
Direction
in betweene0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“using fulvic acid at 1g/l or lithovit Co2 at 0.5 g/l as foliar sprays on Super gold cultivar came in between in this respect during both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1641 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lithovit spraying on Super gold produced intermediate trait values.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicumt0
Material
Super golde0
Treatment
lithovit Co2 at 0.5 g/le0
Outcome
came in betweene0
Direction
in betweene0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“using fulvic acid at 1g/l or lithovit Co2 at 0.5 g/l as foliar sprays on Super gold cultivar came in between in this respect during both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1641 · show in text ↑

silicate(4-) · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

silicate(4-) · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

potassium · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

47 papers: 34 positive, 13 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

potassium · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

80 papers: 67 positive, 13 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

76 papers more in this group

See all 80 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.