Paper · 2023 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Credibility assessment of cold adaptive Pseudomonas jesenni MP1 and P. palleroniana N26 on growth, rhizosphere dynamics, nutrient status, and yield of the kidney bean cultivated in Indian Central Himalaya

Amir Khan; Ajay Veer Singh; Navneet Pareek; et al.

10
claims
23
verbatim quotes
25
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Kidney bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris ) productivity and nutritional quality are declining due to less nutrient accessibility, poor soil health, and indigent agronomic practices in hilly regions, which collectively led to a fall in farmer’s income, and to malnutrition in consumers. Addressing such issues, the present investigation was designed to assess the impact of Pseudomonas jesenii MP1 and Pseudomonas palleroniana N26 treatment on soil health, microbial shift, yield, and nutrient status of the kidney bean in the Harsil and Chakrata locations of Indian Central Himalaya. P. jesenii MP1 and P. palleroniana N26 were characterized as cold adaptive PGPR as they possessed remarkable in vitro plant growth promoting traits. Further, field trial study with PGPR treatments demonstrated remarkable and prolific influence of both strains on yield, kidney bean nutrient status, and soil health at both geographical locations, which was indicated with improved grain yield (11.61%–23.78%), protein (6.13%–24.46%), and zinc content (21.86%–61.17%) over control. The metagenomic study revealed that use of bioinoculants also concentrated the nutrient mobilizing and plant beneficial microorganisms in the rhizosphere of the kidney bean. Moreover, correlation analysis also confirmed that the plant growth-promoting traits of P. jesenii MP1 and P. palleroniana N26 are the basis for improved yield and nutrient status of the kidney bean. Further, cluster and principal component analysis revealed that both P . jesenii MP1 and P. palleroniana N26 exhibited pronounced influence on yield attributes of the kidney bean at both the locations. At the Harsil location, the P. jesenii MP1-treated seed demonstrated highest grain yield over other treatments, whereas at Chakarata, P. jesenii MP1, and P. palleroniana N26 treatment showed almost equal enhancement (~23%) in grain yield over control. The above results revealed that these bioinoculants are efficient plant growth promoters and nutrient mobilizers; they could be used as green technology to improve human health and farmer’s income by enhancing soil health, yield, and nutrient status of the kidney bean at hilly regions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two strains had in vitro plant growth promoting traits.

Taxon
kidney beanPhaseolus vulgarise0t0
Outcome
in vitro plant growth promoting traitse0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P. jesenii MP1 and P. palleroniana N26 were characterized as cold adaptive PGPR as they possessed remarkable in vitro plant growth promoting traits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–724 · show in text ↑
t0

“kidney bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR treatment improved grain yield by 11.61%–23.78%.

Taxon
kidney beanPhaseolus vulgarise0t0e2
Treatment
PGPR treatmentse0t0e2
Outcome
grain yielde0t0e2
Direction
improvede0t0e2
Value
11.61%–23.78%e0t0e2
Comparator
controle0t0e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improved grain yield (11.61%–23.78%), protein (6.13%–24.46%), and zinc content (21.86%–61.17%) over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1056 · show in text ↑
t0

“kidney bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–166 · show in text ↑
e2

“field trial study with PGPR treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–772 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR treatment improved protein by 6.13%–24.46%.

Taxon
kidney beanPhaseolus vulgarise0t0e2
Treatment
PGPR treatmentse0t0e2
Outcome
proteine0t0e2
Direction
improvede0t0e2
Value
6.13%–24.46%e0t0e2
Comparator
controle0t0e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improved grain yield (11.61%–23.78%), protein (6.13%–24.46%), and zinc content (21.86%–61.17%) over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1056 · show in text ↑
t0

“kidney bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–166 · show in text ↑
e2

“field trial study with PGPR treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–772 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR treatment improved zinc content by 21.86%–61.17%.

Taxon
kidney beanPhaseolus vulgarise0t0e2
Treatment
PGPR treatmentse0t0e2
Outcome
zinc contente0t0e2
Direction
improvede0t0e2
Value
21.86%–61.17%e0t0e2
Comparator
controle0t0e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improved grain yield (11.61%–23.78%), protein (6.13%–24.46%), and zinc content (21.86%–61.17%) over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1056 · show in text ↑
t0

“kidney bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–166 · show in text ↑
e2

“field trial study with PGPR treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–772 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bioinoculants concentrated beneficial nutrient mobilizing rhizosphere microorganisms.

Taxon
kidney beanPhaseolus vulgarise0t0
Treatment
bioinoculantse0t0
Outcome
nutrient mobilizing and plant beneficial microorganismse0t0
Direction
concentratede0t0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“use of bioinoculants also concentrated the nutrient mobilizing and plant beneficial microorganisms in the rhizosphere of the kidney bean.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1230 · show in text ↑
t0

“kidney bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–166 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth promoting traits correlated with improved yield and nutrient status.

Taxon
kidney beanPhaseolus vulgarise0t0
Interactor
P. jesenii MP1e0t0
Outcome
yield and nutrient statuse0t0
Direction
improvede0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant growth-promoting traits of P. jesenii MP1 and P. palleroniana N26 are the basis for improved yield and nutrient status of the kidney bean.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1430 · show in text ↑
t0

“kidney bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–166 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both strains influenced kidney bean yield attributes at both locations.

Taxon
kidney beanPhaseolus vulgarise0t0
Outcome
yield attributese0t0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both P . jesenii MP1 and P. palleroniana N26 exhibited pronounced influence on yield attributes of the kidney bean at both the locations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1495–1632 · show in text ↑
t0

“kidney bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. jesenii MP1 seed treatment produced the highest grain yield at Harsil.

Taxon
kidney beanPhaseolus vulgarise0t0
Treatment
P. jesenii MP1-treated seede0t0
Outcome
grain yielde0t0
Direction
higheste0t0
Comparator
other treatmentse0t0
Setting
Harsile0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the Harsil location, the P. jesenii MP1-treated seed demonstrated highest grain yield over other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1633–1743 · show in text ↑
t0

“kidney bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both inoculants produced about 23% grain yield enhancement at Chakarata.

Taxon
kidney beanPhaseolus vulgarise0t0
Treatment
P. jesenii MP1, and P. palleroniana N26 treatmente0t0
Outcome
grain yielde0t0
Direction
enhancemente0t0
Value
~23%e0t0
Comparator
controle0t0
Setting
Chakaratae0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at Chakarata, P. jesenii MP1, and P. palleroniana N26 treatment showed almost equal enhancement (~23%) in grain yield over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1753–1884 · show in text ↑
t0

“kidney bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–166 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose bioinoculants for hilly kidney bean production.

Taxon
kidney beanPhaseolus vulgarise0t0
Outcome
enhancing soil health, yield, and nutrient statuse0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“they could be used as green technology to improve human health and farmer’s income by enhancing soil health, yield, and nutrient status of the kidney bean at hilly regions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1999–2171 · show in text ↑
t0

“kidney bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–166 · show in text ↑

inoculation · quality: protein · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 40 positive, 4 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

195 papers: 153 positive, 42 negative or no effect

152 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

191 papers more in this group

See all 195 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.