Paper · 2017 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Efficacy of zinc on yield, economics and soil properties of wheat (Triticum aestivum) in black soil of central Gujarat

A K RAI; S KHAJURIA; KANAK LATA; et al.

14
claims
36
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field trial was conducted during winter (rabi) season 2011 to 13 in vertisol to study the influence of zinc on yield, nutrient uptake, economics and soil properties of wheat. The recommended doses of N, P and K were applied @ 120 N: 60 P2O5: 40 K2O kg/ha in combination with Zn @ 0, 1.25, 2.5, 5 and 10 kg/ha were applied at time of sowing in all the treatments. Results of study revealed that the yield, harvest index and nutrient uptake (N, K and Zn). Zinc increased significantly with the application of recommended N P K + Zn @ 10 kg/ha as compared to NPK alone and other doses of zinc. In general, yield, harvest index and total nutrient uptake, increased to the highest level of Zn, except total P uptake. The maximum yield (grain-44.37 and straw-50.74 kg/ha) and total nutrient uptake (N-117.23 kg/ha, K-85.90 kg/ha and Zn 286.41 g/ha), was recorded by the application of 10 kg Zn/ha along with recommended dose of NPK as compared to control. The total P uptake declined with increasing levels of Zn. There was no appraisal change in soil pH, EC, organic carbon and CaCO3, but the status of DTPA-extractable Zn of soil was improved remarkably owing to Zn application with combination of recommended NPK. The economics the yield revealed that the FLD recorded higher gross returns (Rupees 55625) and net return (Rupees 32925) with higher benefit cost ratio (2.45) when compared to control. The impact of FLDs was analyzed and remarkable improvement of knowledge and satisfaction of farmers in terms of yield and revenue by dint of technological intervention.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn at 10 kg/ha with NPK significantly increased wheat yield and harvest index versus NPK alone and other zinc doses.

Treatment
recommended N P K + Zn @ 10 kg/hae0
Outcome
yield, harvest indexe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
NPK alone and other doses of zince0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“yield, harvest index and nutrient uptake (N, K and Zn). Zinc increased significantly with the application of recommended N P K + Zn @ 10 kg/ha as compared to NPK alone and other doses of zinc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn at 10 kg/ha with NPK significantly increased wheat N, K and Zn uptake.

Treatment
recommended N P K + Zn @ 10 kg/hae0
Outcome
nutrient uptake (N, K and Zn)e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
NPK alone and other doses of zince0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“nutrient uptake (N, K and Zn). Zinc increased significantly with the application of recommended N P K + Zn @ 10 kg/ha as compared to NPK alone and other doses of zinc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest Zn level gave maximum grain yield of 44.37 kg/ha.

Treatment
10 kg Zn/ha along with recommended dose of NPKe1
Outcome
graine0
Direction
maximume0
Value
44.37e0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“maximum yield (grain-44.37 and straw-50.74 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–767 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of 10 kg Zn/ha along with recommended dose of NPK as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–950 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest Zn level gave maximum straw yield of 50.74 kg/ha.

Treatment
10 kg Zn/ha along with recommended dose of NPKe1
Outcome
strawe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
50.74 kg/hae0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“maximum yield (grain-44.37 and straw-50.74 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–767 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of 10 kg Zn/ha along with recommended dose of NPK as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–950 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 10 kg Zn/ha, total N uptake was 117.23 kg/ha.

Treatment
10 kg Zn/ha along with recommended dose of NPKe1
Outcome
Ne0
Direction
maximume2
Value
117.23 kg/hae0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“total nutrient uptake (N-117.23 kg/ha, K-85.90 kg/ha and Zn 286.41 g/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–844 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of 10 kg Zn/ha along with recommended dose of NPK as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–950 · show in text ↑
e2

“The maximum yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–731 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 10 kg Zn/ha, total K uptake was 85.90 kg/ha.

Treatment
10 kg Zn/ha along with recommended dose of NPKe1
Outcome
Ke0
Direction
maximume2
Value
85.90 kg/hae0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“total nutrient uptake (N-117.23 kg/ha, K-85.90 kg/ha and Zn 286.41 g/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–844 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of 10 kg Zn/ha along with recommended dose of NPK as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–950 · show in text ↑
e2

“The maximum yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–731 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 10 kg Zn/ha, total Zn uptake was 286.41 g/ha.

Treatment
10 kg Zn/ha along with recommended dose of NPKe1
Outcome
Zne0
Direction
maximume2
Value
286.41 g/hae0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“total nutrient uptake (N-117.23 kg/ha, K-85.90 kg/ha and Zn 286.41 g/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–844 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of 10 kg Zn/ha along with recommended dose of NPK as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–950 · show in text ↑
e2

“The maximum yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–731 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total P uptake declined as Zn level increased.

Treatment
increasing levels of Zne0
Outcome
total P uptakee0
Direction
declinede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“The total P uptake declined with increasing levels of Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1008 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH, EC, organic carbon and CaCO3 showed no appreciable change.

Outcome
soil pH, EC, organic carbon and CaCO3e0
Direction
no appraisal changee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“There was no appraisal change in soil pH, EC, organic carbon and CaCO3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1080 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn application with NPK improved soil DTPA-extractable Zn.

Treatment
Zn application with combination of recommended NPKe0
Outcome
DTPA-extractable Zn of soile0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“status of DTPA-extractable Zn of soil was improved remarkably owing to Zn application with combination of recommended NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1211 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FLD produced higher gross returns of Rupees 55625 versus control.

Treatment
FLDe0
Outcome
gross returnse0
Direction
highere0
Value
Rupees 55625e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“FLD recorded higher gross returns (Rupees 55625) and net return (Rupees 32925) with higher benefit cost ratio (2.45) when compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1396 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FLD produced higher net return of Rupees 32925 versus control.

Treatment
FLDe0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
highere0
Value
Rupees 32925e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“FLD recorded higher gross returns (Rupees 55625) and net return (Rupees 32925) with higher benefit cost ratio (2.45) when compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1396 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FLD produced a higher benefit cost ratio of 2.45 versus control.

Treatment
FLDe0
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.45e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“FLD recorded higher gross returns (Rupees 55625) and net return (Rupees 32925) with higher benefit cost ratio (2.45) when compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1396 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The technology intervention improved farmers’ knowledge and satisfaction regarding yield and revenue.

Outcome
knowledge and satisfaction of farmerse0
Direction
improvemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“remarkable improvement of knowledge and satisfaction of farmers in terms of yield and revenue by dint of technological intervention”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1434–1565 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.