Paper · 2023 · Life

Foliar Fertilizer Application Alters the Effect of Girdling on the Nutrient Contents and Yield of Camellia oleifera

Shuangling Xie; Dongmei Li; Zhouying Liu; et al.

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Improving the economic benefits of Camellia oleifera is a major problem for C. oleifera growers, and girdling and foliar fertilizer have significant effects on improving the economic benefits of plants. This study explains the effects of girdling, girdling + foliar fertilizer on nutrient distribution, and the economic benefits of C. oleifera at different times. It also explains the N, P, and K contents of roots, leaves, fruits, and flower buds (sampled in March, May, August, and October 2021) and their economic benefits. The results showed girdling promoted the accumulation of N and K in leaves in March 2021 (before spring shoot emergence) but inhibited the accumulation of P, which led to the accumulation of P in roots and that of N in fruits in August 2021 (fruit expansion period). Foliar fertilizer application after girdling replenished the P content of leaves in March 2021, and P continued to accumulate in large quantities at the subsequent sampling time points. The N and P contents of the root system decreased in March. In October (fruit ripening stage), girdled shrubs showed higher contents of N and K in fruits and flower buds, and consequently lower relative contents of N and K in roots and leaves but higher content of P in leaves. Foliar fertilizer application slowed down the effects of girdling on nutrient accumulation in fruits and flower buds. Spraying foliar fertilizer decreased the N:P ratio in the flower buds and fruits of girdled plants. Thus, foliar fertilizer spray weakened the effects of girdling on the nutrient content and economic benefits of C. oleifera. In conclusion, girdling changed the nutrient accumulation pattern in various organs of C. oleifera at different stages, increased leaf N:K ratio before shoot emergence, reduced root K content at the fruit expansion stage and the N:K ratio of mature fruit, and promoted economic benefits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling promoted leaf N accumulation in March.

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
girdlinge0
Outcome
accumulation of Ne0
Direction
promotede0
Qualifier
March 2021e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“girdling promoted the accumulation of N and K in leaves in March 2021 (before spring shoot emergence) but inhibited the accumulation of P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–683 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling promoted leaf K accumulation in March.

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
girdlinge0
Outcome
N and Ke0
Direction
promotede0
Qualifier
March 2021e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“girdling promoted the accumulation of N and K in leaves in March 2021 (before spring shoot emergence) but inhibited the accumulation of P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–683 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling inhibited leaf P accumulation in March.

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
girdlinge0
Outcome
accumulation of Pe0
Direction
inhibitede0
Qualifier
March 2021e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“girdling promoted the accumulation of N and K in leaves in March 2021 (before spring shoot emergence) but inhibited the accumulation of P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–683 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–115 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling was associated with P accumulation in roots.

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
accumulation of Pe0
Qualifier
August 2021e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which led to the accumulation of P in roots and that of N in fruits in August 2021 (fruit expansion period)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–792 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–115 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling was associated with N accumulation in fruits.

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Organ / stage
fruitse0
Outcome
that of Ne0
Qualifier
August 2021e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which led to the accumulation of P in roots and that of N in fruits in August 2021 (fruit expansion period)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–792 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar fertilizer after girdling replenished leaf phosphorus in March.

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
Foliar fertilizer application after girdlinge0
Outcome
P content of leavese0
Direction
replenishede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar fertilizer application after girdling replenished the P content of leaves in March 2021, and P continued to accumulate in large quantities at the subsequent sampling time points”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–978 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–115 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf phosphorus continued accumulating at later sampling times.

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Outcome
P continued to accumulate in large quantitiese0
Qualifier
subsequent sampling time pointse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar fertilizer application after girdling replenished the P content of leaves in March 2021, and P continued to accumulate in large quantities at the subsequent sampling time points”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–978 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–115 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root N content decreased in March.

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Organ / stage
root systeme0
Outcome
N and P contents of the root systeme0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The N and P contents of the root system decreased in March”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1038 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–115 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root P content decreased in March.

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Organ / stage
root systeme0
Outcome
P contents of the root systeme0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The N and P contents of the root system decreased in March”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1038 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling produced higher N in fruits and flower buds in October.

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Organ / stage
fruits and flower budse0
Treatment
girdled shrubse0
Outcome
contents of N and Ke0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
Octobere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In October (fruit ripening stage), girdled shrubs showed higher contents of N and K in fruits and flower buds, and consequently lower relative contents of N and K in roots and leaves but higher content of P in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1256 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling produced higher K in fruits and flower buds in October.

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Organ / stage
fruits and flower budse0
Treatment
girdled shrubse0
Outcome
contents of N and Ke0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
Octobere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In October (fruit ripening stage), girdled shrubs showed higher contents of N and K in fruits and flower buds, and consequently lower relative contents of N and K in roots and leaves but higher content of P in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1256 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling produced lower N in roots and leaves in October.

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Organ / stage
roots and leavese0
Treatment
girdled shrubse0
Outcome
contents of N and Ke0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
Octobere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In October (fruit ripening stage), girdled shrubs showed higher contents of N and K in fruits and flower buds, and consequently lower relative contents of N and K in roots and leaves but higher content of P in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1256 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling produced lower K in roots and leaves in October.

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Organ / stage
roots and leavese0
Treatment
girdled shrubse0
Outcome
contents of N and Ke0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
Octobere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In October (fruit ripening stage), girdled shrubs showed higher contents of N and K in fruits and flower buds, and consequently lower relative contents of N and K in roots and leaves but higher content of P in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1256 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling produced higher P in leaves in October.

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
girdled shrubse0
Outcome
content of Pe0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
Octobere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In October (fruit ripening stage), girdled shrubs showed higher contents of N and K in fruits and flower buds, and consequently lower relative contents of N and K in roots and leaves but higher content of P in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1256 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar fertilizer slowed girdling effects on nutrient accumulation in reproductive organs.

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Organ / stage
fruits and flower budse0
Treatment
Foliar fertilizer applicatione0
Outcome
nutrient accumulatione0
Direction
slowed downe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar fertilizer application slowed down the effects of girdling on nutrient accumulation in fruits and flower buds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1374 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar fertilizer lowered the N:P ratio of buds and fruit in girdled plants.

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Organ / stage
flower buds and fruitse0
Treatment
Spraying foliar fertilizere0
Outcome
N:P ratioe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying foliar fertilizer decreased the N:P ratio in the flower buds and fruits of girdled plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1474 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling increased leaf N:K ratio.

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Treatment
girdlinge0
Outcome
leaf N:K ratioe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“girdling changed the nutrient accumulation pattern in various organs of C. oleifera at different stages, increased leaf N:K ratio before shoot emergence, reduced root K content at the fruit expansion stage and the N:K ratio of mature fruit, and promoted economic benefits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1616–1887 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling reduced root K content.

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Treatment
girdlinge0
Outcome
root K contente0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“girdling changed the nutrient accumulation pattern in various organs of C. oleifera at different stages, increased leaf N:K ratio before shoot emergence, reduced root K content at the fruit expansion stage and the N:K ratio of mature fruit, and promoted economic benefits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1616–1887 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling reduced N:K ratio of mature fruit.

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Treatment
girdlinge0
Outcome
N:K ratio of mature fruite0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“girdling changed the nutrient accumulation pattern in various organs of C. oleifera at different stages, increased leaf N:K ratio before shoot emergence, reduced root K content at the fruit expansion stage and the N:K ratio of mature fruit, and promoted economic benefits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1616–1887 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling promoted economic benefits.

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Treatment
girdlinge0
Outcome
economic benefitse0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“girdling changed the nutrient accumulation pattern in various organs of C. oleifera at different stages, increased leaf N:K ratio before shoot emergence, reduced root K content at the fruit expansion stage and the N:K ratio of mature fruit, and promoted economic benefits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1616–1887 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–115 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · Camellia oleifera (tea-oil Camellia)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Camellia oleifera (tea-oil Camellia)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

pruning · nutrient: content · Camellia oleifera (tea-oil Camellia)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

pruning · yield · Camellia oleifera (tea-oil Camellia)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.