Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Characterization of the Seed Biopriming, Plant Growth-Promoting and Salinity-Ameliorating Potential of Halophilic Fungi Isolated from Hypersaline Habitats

Muhammad Aizaz; Waqar Ahmad; Sajjad Asaf; et al.

14
claims
27
verbatim quotes
29
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Salinity stress is one of the major abiotic factors limiting crop yield in arid and semi-arid regions. Plant growth-promoting fungi can help plants thrive in stressful conditions. In this study, we isolated and characterized 26 halophilic fungi (endophytic, rhizospheric, and soil) from the coastal region of Muscat, Oman, for plant growth-promoting activities. About 16 out of 26 fungi were found to produce IAA, and about 11 isolates (MGRF1, MGRF2, GREF1, GREF2, TQRF4, TQRF5, TQRF5, TQRF6, TQRF7, TQRF8, TQRF2) out of 26 strains were found to significantly improve seed germination and seedling growth of wheat. To evaluate the effect of the above-selected strains on salt tolerance in wheat, we grew wheat seedlings in 150 mM, 300 mM NaCl and SW (100% seawater) treatments and inoculated them with the above strains. Our findings showed that fungal strains MGRF1, MGRF2, GREF2, and TQRF9 alleviate 150 mM salt stress and increase shoot length compared to their respective control plants. However, in 300 mM stressed plants, GREF1 and TQRF9 were observed to improve shoot length. Two strains, GREF2 and TQRF8, also promoted plant growth and reduced salt stress in SW-treated plants. Like shoot length, an analogous pattern was observed in root length, and different salt stressors such as 150 mM, 300 mM, and SW reduced root length by up to 4%, 7.5%, and 19.5%, respectively. Three strains, GREF1, TQRF7, and MGRF1, had higher catalase (CAT) levels, and similar results were observed in polyphenol oxidase (PPO), and GREF1 inoculation dramatically raised the PPO level in 150 mM salt stress. The fungal strains had varying effects, with some, such as GREF1, GREF2, and TQRF9, showing a significant increase in protein content as compared to their respective control plants. Under salinity stress, the expression of DREB2 and DREB6 genes was reduced. However, the WDREB2 gene, on the other hand, was shown to be highly elevated during salt stress conditions, whereas the opposite was observed in inoculated plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sixteen of 26 halophilic fungal isolates produced IAA.

Interactor
fungiFungie0symbiont
Outcome
fungi were found to produce IAAe0
Value
16 out of 26e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“About 16 out of 26 fungi were found to produce IAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–412 · show in text ↑
e1

“seed germination and seedling growth of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–613 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Eleven fungal isolates significantly improved wheat seed germination and seedling growth.

Treatment
11 isolatese0
Interactor
isolatese0symbiont
Outcome
seed germination and seedling growthe0
Direction
improvee0
Value
11 isolatese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“about 11 isolates (MGRF1, MGRF2, GREF1, GREF2, TQRF4, TQRF5, TQRF5, TQRF6, TQRF7, TQRF8, TQRF2) out of 26 strains were found to significantly improve seed germination and seedling growth of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–613 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MGRF1, MGRF2, GREF2 and TQRF9 increased wheat shoot length under 150 mM salt stress.

Treatment
MGRF1, MGRF2, GREF2, and TQRF9e0
Interactor
fungal strainse0symbiont
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
150 mM salt stresse0
Comparator
their respective control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fungal strains MGRF1, MGRF2, GREF2, and TQRF9 alleviate 150 mM salt stress and increase shoot length compared to their respective control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–990 · show in text ↑
e1

“salt tolerance in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–694 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GREF1 and TQRF9 improved shoot length in wheat stressed with 300 mM salt.

Treatment
GREF1 and TQRF9e0
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
improvee0
Qualifier
300 mMe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in 300 mM stressed plants, GREF1 and TQRF9 were observed to improve shoot length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1081 · show in text ↑
e1

“salt tolerance in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–694 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GREF2 and TQRF8 promoted growth and reduced salt stress in seawater-treated wheat.

Treatment
GREF2 and TQRF8e0
Outcome
plant growth and reduced salt stresse0
Direction
promotede0
Qualifier
SW-treated plantse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GREF2 and TQRF8, also promoted plant growth and reduced salt stress in SW-treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1184 · show in text ↑
e1

“salt tolerance in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–694 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root length followed the reported shoot-length pattern under fungal inoculation.

Outcome
root lengthe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Like shoot length, an analogous pattern was observed in root length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1253 · show in text ↑
e1

“salt tolerance in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–694 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

150 mM salt stress reduced wheat root length by up to 4%.

Treatment
150 mMe0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“different salt stressors such as 150 mM, 300 mM, and SW reduced root length by up to 4%, 7.5%, and 19.5%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1377 · show in text ↑
e1

“salt tolerance in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–694 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

300 mM salt stress reduced wheat root length by up to 7.5%.

Treatment
300 mMe0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
7.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“different salt stressors such as 150 mM, 300 mM, and SW reduced root length by up to 4%, 7.5%, and 19.5%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1377 · show in text ↑
e1

“salt tolerance in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–694 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seawater stress reduced wheat root length by up to 19.5%.

Treatment
SWe0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
19.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“different salt stressors such as 150 mM, 300 mM, and SW reduced root length by up to 4%, 7.5%, and 19.5%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1377 · show in text ↑
e1

“salt tolerance in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–694 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GREF1, TQRF7 and MGRF1 gave higher catalase levels, with similar polyphenol oxidase results.

Treatment
GREF1, TQRF7, and MGRF1e0
Outcome
catalase (CAT) levelse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three strains, GREF1, TQRF7, and MGRF1, had higher catalase (CAT) levels, and similar results were observed in polyphenol oxidase (PPO)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1514 · show in text ↑
e1

“salt tolerance in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–694 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GREF1 inoculation raised PPO in wheat under 150 mM salt stress.

Treatment
GREF1 inoculatione0
Outcome
PPO levele0
Direction
raisede0
Qualifier
150 mM salt stresse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GREF1 inoculation dramatically raised the PPO level in 150 mM salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1520–1593 · show in text ↑
e1

“salt tolerance in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–694 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GREF1, GREF2 and TQRF9 significantly increased wheat protein content against control plants.

Treatment
GREF1, GREF2, and TQRF9e0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
their respective control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GREF1, GREF2, and TQRF9, showing a significant increase in protein content as compared to their respective control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1654–1775 · show in text ↑
e1

“salt tolerance in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–694 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity stress reduced expression of DREB2 and DREB6 in wheat.

Treatment
salinity stresse0
Gene
DREB2 and DREB6e0
Outcome
expression of DREB2 and DREB6 genese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under salinity stress, the expression of DREB2 and DREB6 genes was reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1777–1851 · show in text ↑
e1

“salt tolerance in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–694 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress strongly elevated WDREB2 expression in wheat, whereas inoculated plants showed the opposite.

Treatment
salt stress conditionse0
Gene
WDREB2e0
Outcome
WDREB2 genee0
Direction
highly elevatede0
Comparator
inoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the WDREB2 gene, on the other hand, was shown to be highly elevated during salt stress conditions, whereas the opposite was observed in inoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1862–2015 · show in text ↑
e1

“salt tolerance in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–694 · show in text ↑

salinity · molecular: expression · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

39 papers: 22 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

inoculation · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 44 positive, 3 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.