Paper · 2023 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Effect of bio-fertilizers on growth, yield and quality of onion (Allium cepa)

Asha Bhausaheb Kadam; Sangita Abhijit Kulkarni

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out during the winter season of two consecutive years 2006-07 and 2007-08 to study the effect of six combinations of bio-fertilizers and two chemical fertilizers on onion (Pusa variety). The treatments were Azotobacter+PSB, Azotobacter+VAM, Azotobacter+Azospirillum, Azospirillum+PSB, Azospirrilum+VAM, PSB+VAM, NPK 100%, NPK 50% and Control. The height of the plant was maximum (40.43cm) with the application of Azotobacter+VAM. Number of leaves, number of inflorescence / plot and bulb diameter were maximum of Azotobacter+Azospirillum. Azotobacter+Azospirillum and NPK 100% gave maximum length of bulbs (6.23cm). The maximum number of scale per bulb (9.88) was counted from NPK 50%. Hence, it is concluded that Azotobacter+Azospirillum combination is the better for onion growth as compared to other combination of biofertilisers. Due to this, here the sustainability in production and environmental consideration are concerned.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter+VAM produced maximum plant height of 40.43cm.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
Azotobacter+VAMe0
Outcome
height of the plante0
Direction
maximume0
Value
40.43cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion (Allium cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–77 · show in text ↑
e0

“The height of the plant was maximum (40.43cm) with the application of Azotobacter+VAM.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–460 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter+Azospirillum maximized leaf number, inflorescences per plot and bulb diameter.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
Azotobacter+Azospirillume0
Outcome
Number of leaves, number of inflorescence / plot and bulb diametere0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion (Allium cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–77 · show in text ↑
e0

“Number of leaves, number of inflorescence / plot and bulb diameter were maximum of Azotobacter+Azospirillum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–569 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter+Azospirillum and NPK 100% each gave maximum bulb length of 6.23cm.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
Azotobacter+Azospirillum and NPK 100%e0
Outcome
length of bulbse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
6.23cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion (Allium cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–77 · show in text ↑
e0

“Azotobacter+Azospirillum and NPK 100% gave maximum length of bulbs (6.23cm).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–646 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK 50% yielded the maximum number of scales per bulb, 9.88.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
NPK 50%e0
Outcome
number of scale per bulbe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
9.88e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion (Allium cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–77 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum number of scale per bulb (9.88) was counted from NPK 50%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–716 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded Azotobacter+Azospirillum was better for onion growth than other biofertilizer combinations.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Outcome
Azotobacter+Azospirillum combination is the better for onion growthe0
Comparator
other combination of biofertiliserse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion (Allium cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–77 · show in text ↑
e0

“Azotobacter+Azospirillum combination is the better for onion growth as compared to other combination of biofertilisers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–864 · show in text ↑

Azotobacter · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 20 positive, 1 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Azotobacter · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Azospirillum · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

24 papers: 24 positive, 0 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

53 papers: 48 positive, 5 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.