Paper · 2023 · PLANT ARCHIVES

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF GROWTH AND YIELD PARAMETERS OF GRAPE VAR. ‘MUSCAT HAMBURG’ GRAFTED ON ‘DOG RIDGE’ ROOTSTOCK AND SELF-ROOTED CUTTINGS

L. Priyadarsini; A. Subbiah; S. Srivignesh; et al.

11
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

India ranks seventh in grape production at the global level.Tamil Nadu is one of the leading states in grape cultivation in India.The utilization of rootstock has become a priority aspect in grapes cultivation worldwide, especially in the current climatic conditions.The utilization of grape root stocks has not been completely explored yet in Tamil Nadu.In this regard, we compared the growth and yield parameters of grape (Vitis vinifera) var.''Muscat Hamburg'' grafted on 'Dog Ridge' (Vitis champini) and self-rooted cuttings(of ''Muscat Hamburg'') under Cumbum valley condition, Theni district, Tamil Nadu, India.Randomly, fifty vines were chosen, each in grafted and self-rooted cutting category.'Muscat Hamburg' is a wide variety in Cumbum valley of Theni district.The growth and yield characters were recorded.The petiole nutrient content for major elements during the flowering phase was analyzed.The growth characters viz., trunk diameter (42.46 mm), cane diameter (5.70 mm), number of fruitful shoots per cane (1.37), shoot length after pruning (42.52 cm), and leaf area (108.16cm 2 ) were recorded maximum in 'Muscat Hamburg' grafted on 'Dog Ridge' rootstock.The grafted 'Muscat Hamburg'on 'Dog Ridge' showed the highest berry weight (3.67 g),and the number of clusters per shoot (1.46).The yield characters, viz., the fruitfulness characters, such as the number of fruitful shoots per cane (1.37) was recorded better in 'Muscat Hamburg' grafted on 'Dog Ridge' rootstock.The total number of berries per bunch (87.00), and yield per vine (21.87 kg/vine) were recorded as the highest in grafted vines.Obviously, when berry weight was the highest in grafted type, it reflected in bunch weight (276.74 g) with a maximum amount than self-rooted.The petiole nutrient contents were also found to be higher in grafted ones than in self-rooted cuttings.Overall, the use of 'Dog Ridge' as rootstock for grape variety 'Muscat Hamburg' was found promising to set enhanced vegetative growth, berry characters, and yield of the bunch than self-rooted cutting.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted vines had maximum trunk diameter of 42.46 mm.

Taxon
Muscat Hamburge0
Treatment
grafted on 'Dog Ridge' rootstocke0
Outcome
trunk diametere0
Direction
maximume0
Value
42.46 mme0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The growth characters viz., trunk diameter (42.46 mm), cane diameter (5.70 mm), number of fruitful shoots per cane (1.37), shoot length after pruning (42.52 cm), and leaf area (108.16cm 2 ) were recorded maximum in 'Muscat Hamburg' grafted on 'Dog Ridge' rootstock.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1170 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted vines had maximum cane diameter of 5.70 mm.

Taxon
Muscat Hamburge0
Treatment
grafted on 'Dog Ridge' rootstocke0
Outcome
cane diametere0
Direction
maximume0
Value
5.70 mme0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The growth characters viz., trunk diameter (42.46 mm), cane diameter (5.70 mm), number of fruitful shoots per cane (1.37), shoot length after pruning (42.52 cm), and leaf area (108.16cm 2 ) were recorded maximum in 'Muscat Hamburg' grafted on 'Dog Ridge' rootstock.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1170 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted vines had a maximum 1.37 fruitful shoots per cane.

Taxon
Muscat Hamburge0
Treatment
grafted on 'Dog Ridge' rootstocke0
Outcome
number of fruitful shoots per canee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1.37e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The growth characters viz., trunk diameter (42.46 mm), cane diameter (5.70 mm), number of fruitful shoots per cane (1.37), shoot length after pruning (42.52 cm), and leaf area (108.16cm 2 ) were recorded maximum in 'Muscat Hamburg' grafted on 'Dog Ridge' rootstock.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1170 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted vines had maximum shoot length after pruning of 42.52 cm.

Taxon
Muscat Hamburge0
Treatment
grafted on 'Dog Ridge' rootstocke0
Outcome
shoot length after pruninge0
Direction
maximume0
Value
42.52 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The growth characters viz., trunk diameter (42.46 mm), cane diameter (5.70 mm), number of fruitful shoots per cane (1.37), shoot length after pruning (42.52 cm), and leaf area (108.16cm 2 ) were recorded maximum in 'Muscat Hamburg' grafted on 'Dog Ridge' rootstock.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1170 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted vines had maximum leaf area of 108.16cm 2.

Taxon
Muscat Hamburge0
Treatment
grafted on 'Dog Ridge' rootstocke0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
maximume0
Value
108.16cm 2e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The growth characters viz., trunk diameter (42.46 mm), cane diameter (5.70 mm), number of fruitful shoots per cane (1.37), shoot length after pruning (42.52 cm), and leaf area (108.16cm 2 ) were recorded maximum in 'Muscat Hamburg' grafted on 'Dog Ridge' rootstock.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1170 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted vines had the highest berry weight, 3.67 g.

Taxon
Muscat Hamburge0
Treatment
grafted 'Muscat Hamburg'on 'Dog Ridge'e0
Outcome
berry weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.67 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The grafted 'Muscat Hamburg'on 'Dog Ridge' showed the highest berry weight (3.67 g),and the number of clusters per shoot (1.46).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1298 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted vines had the highest number of clusters per shoot, 1.46.

Taxon
Muscat Hamburge0
Treatment
grafted 'Muscat Hamburg'on 'Dog Ridge'e0
Outcome
number of clusters per shoote0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.46e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The grafted 'Muscat Hamburg'on 'Dog Ridge' showed the highest berry weight (3.67 g),and the number of clusters per shoot (1.46).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1298 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted vines had the highest total berries per bunch, 87.00.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
grafted vinese0
Outcome
total number of berries per bunche0
Direction
higheste0
Value
87.00e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The total number of berries per bunch (87.00), and yield per vine (21.87 kg/vine) were recorded as the highest in grafted vines.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1482–1610 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAPE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted vines had the highest yield per vine, 21.87 kg/vine.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
grafted vinese0
Outcome
yield per vinee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
21.87 kg/vinee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The total number of berries per bunch (87.00), and yield per vine (21.87 kg/vine) were recorded as the highest in grafted vines.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1482–1610 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAPE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted vines had higher bunch weight of 276.74 g than self-rooted vines.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
grafted typee0
Outcome
bunch weighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
276.74 ge0
Comparator
self-rootede0

Verbatim

e0

“Obviously, when berry weight was the highest in grafted type, it reflected in bunch weight (276.74 g) with a maximum amount than self-rooted.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1610–1751 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAPE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted vines had higher petiole nutrient contents than self-rooted cuttings.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
grafted onese0
Outcome
petiole nutrient contentse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
self-rooted cuttingse0

Verbatim

e0

“The petiole nutrient contents were also found to be higher in grafted ones than in self-rooted cuttings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1751–1855 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAPE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑

grafting · yield · VitisResults differ

28 papers: 21 positive, 7 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

grafting · nutrient: content · VitisPositive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.