Paper · 2022 · Jurnal Pertanian Tropik/Jurnal Online Pertanian Tropik

Effectiveness of Pest Control of Cocoa Fruit (Conopomorpha cramerella as) Using Pruning and Vegetable Insecticide Treatment on Cocoa (Theobroma cacao L)

Samsinar Harahap; Elda Sari Siregar; Amir Mahmud

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

The sustainability of cocoa production in Indonesia is faced with the problem of the cocoa pod borer (Theobroma cacao L.). In an effort to control the main pests on cocoa plants, various techniques can be used, namely control with the use of natural insecticides and control by technical culture in the form of pruning. Natural insecticide is an insecticide whose basic ingredients come from plants that are easilybiodegradablein nature, so they do not pollute the environment and are relatively safe for humans and livestock, because the residue is easily lost. Pruning is the act of removing part of the plant organs in the form of branches, twigs and leaves with the aim of obtaining good cocoa plant branches, regulating the distribution of production branches and leaves so that they are evenly distributed, removing unwanted plant parts, stimulating the plants to grow. form new organs, reduce the risk of pest and disease attacks, and increase the ability of plants to form fruit. The purpose of this study was to determine the response of the application of botanical insecticides and pruning to the control of the cocoa pod borer (Theobroma cacao L.). The experimental design used a non-factorial randomized block design consisting of 7 treatments. The treatment of vegetable insecticides consisted of 4 levels, namely I0 (Without insecticide = Control), I1 (vegetable insecticide made from srikaya seeds at a dose of 250 ml/liter of water), I2 (vegetable insecticide made from tuba root with a dose of 250 ml/liter water), I3 (vegetable insecticide made from tobacco leaves at a dose of 250 ml/liter of water). The pruning treatment consisted of 3 levels, namely I4 (Without Pruning (Control), I5 (Pruning Interval 7 days after the study) and I6 (Pruning Interval 14 days after the study). Observations consisted of attack intensity, level of damage caused by PBK attack, attack index and production Control of the cocoa pod borer by pruning and botanical insecticides on cocoa plants showed a significant effect on the parameters of attack intensity and level of damage at the age of 6 weeks, and the attack index at the age of 12 weeks. 2 msp, 4 msp, 8 msp, 10 msp, 12 msp, and the parameters of the level of damage at the age of 2 msp, 4 msp, 8 msp, 10 msp, 12 msp and the plant production parameters at the age of 12 msp showed no significant effect.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning and botanical insecticides significantly affected cocoa pod borer attack intensity at six weeks.

Treatment
pruning and botanical insecticidese0
Interactor
Conopomorpha cramerellaConopomorpha cramerellat0pest
Outcome
attack intensitye0
Qualifier
at the age of 6 weekse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Conopomorpha cramerella
Conopomorpha cramerella · InteractorTiouraren (Y.-C. Tsai) · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Control of the cocoa pod borer by pruning and botanical insecticides on cocoa plants showed a significant effect on the parameters of attack intensity and level of damage at the age of 6 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1910–2102 · show in text ↑
t0

“Conopomorpha cramerella”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning and botanical insecticides significantly affected cocoa pod borer damage at six weeks.

Treatment
pruning and botanical insecticidese0
Interactor
Conopomorpha cramerellaConopomorpha cramerellat0pest
Outcome
level of damagee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Conopomorpha cramerella
Conopomorpha cramerella · InteractorTiouraren (Y.-C. Tsai) · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Control of the cocoa pod borer by pruning and botanical insecticides on cocoa plants showed a significant effect on the parameters of attack intensity and level of damage at the age of 6 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1910–2102 · show in text ↑
t0

“Conopomorpha cramerella”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning and botanical insecticides significantly affected cocoa pod borer attack index at 12 weeks.

Treatment
pruning and botanical insecticidese0
Interactor
Conopomorpha cramerellaConopomorpha cramerellat0pest
Outcome
attack indexe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Conopomorpha cramerella
Conopomorpha cramerella · InteractorTiouraren (Y.-C. Tsai) · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Control of the cocoa pod borer by pruning and botanical insecticides on cocoa plants showed a significant effect on the parameters of attack intensity and level of damage at the age of 6 weeks, and the attack index at the age of 12 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1910–2147 · show in text ↑
t0

“Conopomorpha cramerella”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Other reported attack and damage observations showed no significant treatment effect.

Treatment
pruning and botanical insecticidese1
Interactor
Conopomorpha cramerellaConopomorpha cramerellat0pest
Outcome
level of damagee0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Conopomorpha cramerella
Conopomorpha cramerella · InteractorTiouraren (Y.-C. Tsai) · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“parameters of the level of damage at the age of 2 msp, 4 msp, 8 msp, 10 msp, 12 msp and the plant production parameters at the age of 12 msp showed no significant effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2194–2363 · show in text ↑
e1

“pruning and botanical insecticides on cocoa plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1944–1994 · show in text ↑
t0

“Conopomorpha cramerella”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cocoa production at 12 weeks showed no significant treatment effect.

Treatment
pruning and botanical insecticidese1
Outcome
plant production parameterse0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant production parameters at the age of 12 msp showed no significant effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2286–2363 · show in text ↑
e1

“pruning and botanical insecticides on cocoa plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1944–1994 · show in text ↑

phytogenic insecticide · Conopomorpha cramerella · Theobroma cacao (cocoa)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

pruning · Conopomorpha cramerella · Theobroma cacao (cocoa)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

pruning · yield · Theobroma cacao (cocoa)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.