Paper · 2023 · Water

Cadmium Bioconcentration and Translocation Potential in Day Neutral and Photoperiod Sensitive Hemp Grown Hydroponically for the Medicinal Market

Amanda O. Marabesi; Jason T. Lessl; Timothy W. Coolong

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Heavy metal contamination of agricultural soils is potentially concerning when growing crops for human consumption. Industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) has been reported to tolerate the presence of heavy metals such as cadmium (Cd) in the soil. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to evaluate Cd uptake and translocation in two day-length sensitive (DLS) and two day-neutral (DN) hemp varieties grown for the medicinal market and to determine the impact of Cd exposure on cannabinoid concentrations in flowers. A hydroponic experiment was conducted by exposing plants to 0 mg·L−1 Cd and 2.5 mg·L−1 Cd in the nutrient solution. Cadmium concentrations ranged from 16.1 to 2274.2 mg·kg−1 in roots, though all four varieties accumulated significant concentrations of Cd in aboveground tissues, with translocation factors ranging from 6.5 to 193. Whole-plant bioconcentration factors ranged from 20 to 1051 mg·kg−1. Cannabinoid concentrations were negatively impacted by Cd exposure in DN varieties but were unaffected in DLS varieties. Biomass was reduced by Cd exposure demonstrating that these varieties might not be suitable for growth on contaminated soil or for phytoremediation. There is potential for Cd accumulation in flowers, showing the need for heavy metal testing of C. sativa consumer products.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root cadmium concentrations ranged from 16.1 to 2274.2 mg·kg−1.

Taxon
Cannabis sativa L.Cannabis sativae1
Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
Cadmium concentrationse0
Value
16.1 to 2274.2 mg·kg−1e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cadmium concentrations ranged from 16.1 to 2274.2 mg·kg−1 in roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–703 · show in text ↑
e1

“Industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–152 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All four hemp varieties accumulated significant aboveground cadmium concentrations.

Taxon
Cannabis sativa L.Cannabis sativae1
Organ / stage
aboveground tissuese0
Outcome
concentrations of Cde0
Qualifier
all four varietiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all four varieties accumulated significant concentrations of Cd in aboveground tissues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–798 · show in text ↑
e1

“Industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–152 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Translocation factors ranged from 6.5 to 193.

Taxon
Cannabis sativa L.Cannabis sativae1
Outcome
translocation factorse0
Value
6.5 to 193e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“translocation factors ranging from 6.5 to 193”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–850 · show in text ↑
e1

“Industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–152 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whole-plant bioconcentration factors ranged from 20 to 1051 mg·kg−1.

Taxon
Cannabis sativa L.Cannabis sativae1
Outcome
Whole-plant bioconcentration factorse0
Value
20 to 1051 mg·kg−1e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Whole-plant bioconcentration factors ranged from 20 to 1051 mg·kg−1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–920 · show in text ↑
e1

“Industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium negatively affected cannabinoid concentrations in day-neutral varieties.

Taxon
Cannabis sativa L.Cannabis sativae1
Material
DN varietiese0
Treatment
Cd exposuree0
Outcome
Cannabinoid concentrationse0
Direction
negatively impactede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cannabinoid concentrations were negatively impacted by Cd exposure in DN varieties but were unaffected in DLS varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1041 · show in text ↑
e1

“Industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium did not affect cannabinoid concentrations in day-length-sensitive varieties.

Taxon
Cannabis sativa L.Cannabis sativae1
Material
DLS varietiese0
Treatment
Cd exposuree0
Outcome
Cannabinoid concentrationse0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cannabinoid concentrations were negatively impacted by Cd exposure in DN varieties but were unaffected in DLS varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1041 · show in text ↑
e1

“Industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium reduced biomass.

Taxon
Cannabis sativa L.Cannabis sativae1
Treatment
Cd exposuree0
Outcome
Biomasse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biomass was reduced by Cd exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1076 · show in text ↑
e1

“Industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–152 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

These varieties might be unsuitable for contaminated soils or phytoremediation.

Taxon
Cannabis sativa L.Cannabis sativae1
Outcome
growth on contaminated soil or for phytoremediatione0
Qualifier
might not be suitablee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these varieties might not be suitable for growth on contaminated soil or for phytoremediation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1189 · show in text ↑
e1

“Industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–152 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium may accumulate in flowers.

Taxon
C. sativaCannabis sativae0
Organ / stage
flowerse0
Outcome
Cd accumulatione0
Qualifier
potentiale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There is potential for Cd accumulation in flowers, showing the need for heavy metal testing of C. sativa consumer products.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1314 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Consumer hemp products need heavy metal testing.

Taxon
C. sativaCannabis sativae0
Outcome
heavy metal testinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“showing the need for heavy metal testing of C. sativa consumer products”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1313 · show in text ↑

cadmium atom · growth · Cannabis sativaPositive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

cadmium atom · molecular: metabolites · Cannabis sativaResults agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

heavy metal · growth · Cannabis sativaResults agree

5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.