Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research

Strigolactones Affect Growth Parameters and Some Antioxidant Enzyme Activities in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under Salt Stress

Ezgi Önay; Sefer Demirbaş

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

External applications of strigolactones affect plant growth positively owing to the potential of adapting plants to the tolerance system under stress conditions. In this study, the effect of synthetic analogue strigolactone (GR24) pre-treatment to the seeds of salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties on growth parameters, antioxidant enzymes, such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX) and glutathione reductase (GR) activity under salt stress were investigated. Salt stress has inhibited shoot development. Root development of the tolerant one was better than sensitive one under salt stress conditions. Salt application to sensitive variety caused the inhibition of APX and GR activities, and pre-treatment increased these activities. In conclusion, GR24 pre-treatment has an encouraging role in the growth of wheat plants by stimulating these antioxidant enzymes against salinity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress inhibited wheat shoot development.

Treatment
Salt stresse0
Outcome
shoot developmente0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salt stress has inhibited shoot development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–566 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under salt stress, root development was better in tolerant than sensitive wheat.

Material
tolerant onee0
Outcome
Root developmente0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
salt stress conditionse0
Comparator
sensitive onee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root development of the tolerant one was better than sensitive one under salt stress conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–663 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt application inhibited APX and GR activities in the sensitive wheat variety.

Material
sensitive varietye0
Treatment
Salt applicatione0
Outcome
APX and GR activitiese0
Direction
inhibitione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salt application to sensitive variety caused the inhibition of APX and GR activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–748 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pretreatment increased APX and GR activities in sensitive wheat.

Treatment
pre-treatmente0
Outcome
these activitiese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pre-treatment increased these activities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–795 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–110 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that GR24 pretreatment encouraged wheat growth through antioxidant enzyme stimulation under salinity.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
GR24 pre-treatmente0
Outcome
growth of wheat plantse0
Qualifier
stimulating these antioxidant enzymes against salinitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GR24 pre-treatment has an encouraging role in the growth of wheat plants by stimulating these antioxidant enzymes against salinity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–942 · show in text ↑

salinity · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

48 papers: 21 positive, 27 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

salinity · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

377 papers: 49 positive, 328 negative or no effect

327 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

373 papers more in this group

See all 377 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.