Paper · 2023 · Korean Journal of Food Preservation

Quality characteristics of fresh cut apples during storage according to processing steps and browning inhibitor treatment

Hyunna Jung; Sun-Duk Cho; Min-Sun Chang; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

We examined the changes in the physicochemical quality characteristics and antioxidant activity of fresh-cut Fuji apples (Malus pumila) during processing and storage after treatment with browning inhibitors. The primary aim was to elucidate processing suitability and storability. We observed that in the processing stage of slicing fresh Fuji apples, there were no significant differences in 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and 2,2′-azinobis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS) radical scavenging ability and ferric-reducing antioxidant power (FRAP). However, after NaClO treatment, total flavonoid and total polyphenol contents decreased. When freshcut Fuji apples were treated with browning inhibitors and stored at 4°C, the L value and hardness decreased; however, the weight loss rate increased based on the storage period of all fruit groups treated with Citrus unshiu Markovich (CuM), calcium ascorbate (CA), and ascorbic acid (AA). The pH increased after 2 days of storage in 1% CuM and after 6 days of storage in 1% CA; however, no changes in pH were observed during the storage period in 1% AA. The DPPH radical scavenging activity was generally good under storage conditions of 1% AA at 4°C and 1% CA at 20°C. Furthermore, FRAP remained relatively constant under storage conditions of 1% CA. The quality characteristics and antioxidant activity of fresh-cut fruits during processing and storage can be used as basic data for industries. Furthermore, we can gain confidence in quality improvements by improving the production and distribution environment of fresh-cut agricultural products.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Slicing did not significantly change DPPH and ABTS scavenging ability or FRAP.

Outcome
radical scavenging ability and ferric-reducing antioxidant power (FRAP)e0
Direction
no significant differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“there were no significant differences in 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and 2,2′-azinobis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS) radical scavenging ability and ferric-reducing antioxidant power (FRAP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–566 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NaClO treatment decreased total flavonoid and total polyphenol contents.

Treatment
NaClO treatmente0
Outcome
total flavonoid and total polyphenol contentse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“after NaClO treatment, total flavonoid and total polyphenol contents decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–655 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across the browning inhibitor groups at 4°C, fruit lightness and hardness decreased during storage.

Treatment
Citrus unshiu Markovich (CuM), calcium ascorbate (CA), and ascorbic acid (AA)e0
Outcome
L value and hardnesse0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
stored at 4°Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“stored at 4°C, the L value and hardness decreased; however, the weight loss rate increased based on the storage period of all fruit groups treated with Citrus unshiu Markovich (CuM), calcium ascorbate (CA), and ascorbic acid (AA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–954 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across the browning inhibitor groups at 4°C, weight loss rate rose during storage.

Treatment
Citrus unshiu Markovich (CuM), calcium ascorbate (CA), and ascorbic acid (AA)e0
Outcome
weight loss ratee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
stored at 4°Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“stored at 4°C, the L value and hardness decreased; however, the weight loss rate increased based on the storage period of all fruit groups treated with Citrus unshiu Markovich (CuM), calcium ascorbate (CA), and ascorbic acid (AA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit pH increased after two days under 1% CuM.

Treatment
1% CuMe0
Outcome
pHe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
after 2 days of storagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“The pH increased after 2 days of storage in 1% CuM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1006 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit pH increased after six days under 1% CA.

Treatment
1% CAe0
Outcome
pHe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
after 6 days of storagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“The pH increased after 2 days of storage in 1% CuM and after 6 days of storage in 1% CA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1043 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit pH did not change over storage under 1% AA.

Treatment
1% AAe0
Outcome
pHe0
Direction
no changese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“no changes in pH were observed during the storage period in 1% AA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DPPH scavenging activity was generally good under 1% AA at 4°C.

Treatment
1% AA at 4°Ce0
Outcome
DPPH radical scavenging activitye0
Qualifier
generally goode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“The DPPH radical scavenging activity was generally good under storage conditions of 1% AA at 4°C and 1% CA at 20°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1235 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DPPH scavenging activity was generally good under 1% CA at 20°C.

Treatment
1% CA at 20°Ce0
Outcome
DPPH radical scavenging activitye0
Qualifier
generally goode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“The DPPH radical scavenging activity was generally good under storage conditions of 1% AA at 4°C and 1% CA at 20°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1235 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FRAP remained relatively constant under 1% CA.

Treatment
1% CAe0
Outcome
FRAPe0
Direction
remained relatively constante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“FRAP remained relatively constant under storage conditions of 1% CA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1317 · show in text ↑