Paper · 2016 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Productivity and profitability of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)-greengram (Vigna radiata) intercropping system under various moisture conservation practices in rainfed conditions

V V KAJE; D K SHARMA; K S MURALIKRISHNA; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Among cropping systems, 1:2 pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L) Millsp] greengram [Vigna radiata (L) Wilczek] intercropping had higher grain yields and economically feasible net returns. In case of moisture conservation practices, barley straw residue (mulch) @ 2.5 tonnes/ha had not only the better economic net returns, but also increased nutrient uptake due to incorporation of nutrients and sufficient moisture conservation in soils throughout cropping season. Although rainfall during the cropping season was sufficient and well distributed (hence moisture availability nearly same among all treatments except under dry spell), straw residue mulch had an advantage of addition of nutrients and organic fractions to the soil. Therefore, farmers can integrate 1:2 pigeonpea-greengram intercropping system without reducing spacing of the main crop and apply previous crop residues as mulch if possible. This not only conserves soil moisture during a dry spell period, but also enhances nutrients uptake under rainfed conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1:2 pigeonpea-greengram intercropping had higher grain yields among cropping systems.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Productivity and profitability of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)-greengram (Vigna radiata) intercropping system under various moisture conservation practices in rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–174 · show in text ↑
e0

“Among cropping systems, 1:2 pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L) Millsp] greengram [Vigna radiata (L) Wilczek] intercropping had higher grain yields and economically feasible net returns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–178 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1:2 pigeonpea-greengram intercropping gave economically feasible net returns.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Outcome
net returnse0
Qualifier
economically feasiblee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Productivity and profitability of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)-greengram (Vigna radiata) intercropping system under various moisture conservation practices in rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–174 · show in text ↑
e0

“Among cropping systems, 1:2 pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L) Millsp] greengram [Vigna radiata (L) Wilczek] intercropping had higher grain yields and economically feasible net returns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley straw residue mulch at 2.5 tonnes/ha gave better economic net returns than the other practices.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
barley straw residue (mulch) @ 2.5 tonnes/hae1
Outcome
economic net returnse1
Direction
bettere1
Setting
rainfed conditionst0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Productivity and profitability of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)-greengram (Vigna radiata) intercropping system under various moisture conservation practices in rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–174 · show in text ↑
e1

“barley straw residue (mulch) @ 2.5 tonnes/ha had not only the better economic net returns, but also increased nutrient uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–349 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley straw residue mulch at 2.5 tonnes/ha increased nutrient uptake.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
barley straw residue (mulch) @ 2.5 tonnes/hae1
Outcome
nutrient uptakee1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
rainfed conditionst0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Productivity and profitability of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)-greengram (Vigna radiata) intercropping system under various moisture conservation practices in rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–174 · show in text ↑
e1

“barley straw residue (mulch) @ 2.5 tonnes/ha had not only the better economic net returns, but also increased nutrient uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–349 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moisture availability was nearly the same among all treatments except under dry spell.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Outcome
moisture availabilitye2
Qualifier
nearly same among all treatments except under dry spelle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Productivity and profitability of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)-greengram (Vigna radiata) intercropping system under various moisture conservation practices in rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–174 · show in text ↑
e2

“moisture availability nearly same among all treatments except under dry spell”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–623 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley straw residue mulch at 2.5 tonnes/ha conserved soil moisture during a dry spell period under rainfed conditions.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
barley straw residue (mulch)e1
Outcome
soil moisturee4
Direction
conservese4
Qualifier
during a dry spell periode4
Setting
rainfed conditionse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Productivity and profitability of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)-greengram (Vigna radiata) intercropping system under various moisture conservation practices in rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–174 · show in text ↑
e1

“barley straw residue (mulch) @ 2.5 tonnes/ha had not only the better economic net returns, but also increased nutrient uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–349 · show in text ↑
e4

“This not only conserves soil moisture during a dry spell period, but also enhances nutrients uptake under rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–1022 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Farmers can integrate the 1:2 pigeonpea-greengram intercropping without reducing the spacing of the main crop and apply previous crop residues as mulch if possible.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Outcome
apply previous crop residues as mulche5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Productivity and profitability of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)-greengram (Vigna radiata) intercropping system under various moisture conservation practices in rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–174 · show in text ↑
e5

“farmers can integrate 1:2 pigeonpea-greengram intercropping system without reducing spacing of the main crop and apply previous crop residues as mulch if possible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–896 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results differ

117 papers: 94 positive, 23 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

113 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

mulching · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

mulching · soil: physics · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mulching · nutrient: content · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.