Paper · 2020 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Effect of nitrogen levels and weed management methods on weed abundance and yield of upland rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Kolo Emmanuel; Adigun Joseph A.; Adeyemi Olusegun R.; et al.

10
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Weed infestation and inherent low soil fertility are among the major factors attributed to the low yield of rice in Nigeria. Field trials were therefore conducted to evaluate the effect of nitrogen application levels and weed control methods on growth and yield of upland rice (var. NERICA 2) at the Teaching and Research Farm of the Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta (07° 15'N, 03° 25'E) during 2015 and 2016 cropping seasons. Three nitrogen (N) levels (0, 60 and 90 kg/ha) were evaluated and they constituted the main plot treatments, while three weed control treatments, viz: pre-emergence application of Orizo Plus® (propanil plus 2, 4-D) at 2.0 kg a.i ha-1, Orizo Plus® at 2.0 kg a.i ha-1 followed by supplementary hoe weeding (SHW) at 6 weeks after sowing (WAS) and three hoe-weeding regimes at 3, 6 and 9 WAS, and a weedy check constituted the sub-plot treatments. All the treatments in different combinations were laid out in a randomized complete block design with a split-plot arrangement with three replicates. Results indicated a significant (p≤0.05) increase in weed density and dry matter with an increase in N application level from 0 to 90 kg ha-1. Similarly, crop vigour and plant height increased significantly (p≤0.05) with increasing N application levels up to 90 kg ha-1. However, 60 and 90 kg N ha-1 were at par in increasing the number of tillers, leaf area index and yield attributes of rice. All the weed control methods resulted in a significant (p≤0.05) reduction in weed density and dry matter with subsequent increase in rice growth and yield than the weedy check. Pre-emergence application of Orizo Plus® followed by SHW at 6 WAS and three hoe-weeding regimes resulted in significantly (p≤0.05) lower weed density and dry matter, and a higher number of tillers, panicle weight and grain yield than a sole application of Orizo Plus®. With Orizo Plus® followed by one SHW or three hoe-weeding regimes, increasing N application levels resulted in a significant (p≤0.05) increase in grain yield of rice. However, with Orizo Plus® applied alone, increasing N application levels did not increase rice grain yield. These results suggest that Orizo Plus® at 2.0 kg a.iha-1 followed by one SHW at 6 WAS integrated with N application at 90 kg ha-1 is adequate to effectively control weeds and increase rice yield in the rainforest-savannah transition zone of Nigeria.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising N from 0 to 90 kg/ha increased weed density and dry matter.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativae0
Treatment
N application level from 0 to 90 kg ha-1e1
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
weed density and dry mattere1
Direction
increasee1
Setting
Teaching and Research Farm of the Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokutae2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of upland rice (var. NERICA 2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–292 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results indicated a significant (p≤0.05) increase in weed density and dry matter with an increase in N application level from 0 to 90 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1173 · show in text ↑
e2

“at the Teaching and Research Farm of the Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 293–377 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N up to 90 kg/ha increased crop vigour and plant height of upland rice.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativae0
Material
NERICA 2e0
Treatment
increasing N application levels up to 90 kg ha-1e1
Outcome
crop vigour and plant heighte1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
Teaching and Research Farm of the Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokutae2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of upland rice (var. NERICA 2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–292 · show in text ↑
e1

“crop vigour and plant height increased significantly (p≤0.05) with increasing N application levels up to 90 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1301 · show in text ↑
e2

“at the Teaching and Research Farm of the Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 293–377 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

60 and 90 kg N/ha were at par for tiller number, leaf area index and yield attributes of rice.

Treatment
60 and 90 kg N ha-1e3
Outcome
number of tillers, leaf area index and yield attributese3
Direction
at pare3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of upland rice (var. NERICA 2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–292 · show in text ↑
e3

“However, 60 and 90 kg N ha-1 were at par in increasing the number of tillers, leaf area index and yield attributes of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1425 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All weed control methods reduced weed density and dry matter compared with the weedy check.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativae0
Treatment
All the weed control methodse4
Interactor
weede4weed
Outcome
weed density and dry mattere4
Direction
reductione4
Comparator
weedy checke4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of upland rice (var. NERICA 2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–292 · show in text ↑
e4

“All the weed control methods resulted in a significant (p≤0.05) reduction in weed density and dry matter with subsequent increase in rice growth and yield than the weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1427–1602 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All weed control methods increased rice growth and yield relative to the weedy check.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativae0
Treatment
All the weed control methodse4
Outcome
rice growth and yielde4
Direction
increasee4
Comparator
weedy checke4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of upland rice (var. NERICA 2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–292 · show in text ↑
e4

“All the weed control methods resulted in a significant (p≤0.05) reduction in weed density and dry matter with subsequent increase in rice growth and yield than the weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1427–1602 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-emergence Orizo Plus® followed by SHW at 6 WAS and three hoe-weeding regimes lowered weed density and dry matter compared with a sole Orizo Plus® application.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativae0
Treatment
Pre-emergence application of Orizo Plus® followed by SHW at 6 WAS and three hoe-weeding regimese5
Interactor
weede5weed
Outcome
weed density and dry mattere5
Direction
lowere5
Comparator
a sole application of Orizo Plus®e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of upland rice (var. NERICA 2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–292 · show in text ↑
e5

“Pre-emergence application of Orizo Plus® followed by SHW at 6 WAS and three hoe-weeding regimes resulted in significantly (p≤0.05) lower weed density and dry matter, and a higher number of tillers, panicle weight and grain yield than a sole application of Orizo Plus®”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1604–1871 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-emergence Orizo Plus® followed by SHW at 6 WAS and three hoe-weeding regimes increased tiller number, panicle weight and grain yield compared with a sole Orizo Plus® application.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativae0
Treatment
Pre-emergence application of Orizo Plus® followed by SHW at 6 WAS and three hoe-weeding regimese5
Outcome
number of tillers, panicle weight and grain yielde5
Direction
highere5
Comparator
a sole application of Orizo Plus®e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of upland rice (var. NERICA 2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–292 · show in text ↑
e5

“Pre-emergence application of Orizo Plus® followed by SHW at 6 WAS and three hoe-weeding regimes resulted in significantly (p≤0.05) lower weed density and dry matter, and a higher number of tillers, panicle weight and grain yield than a sole application of Orizo Plus®”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1604–1871 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

With Orizo Plus® followed by one SHW or three hoe-weeding regimes, increasing N significantly increased rice grain yield.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativae0
Treatment
increasing N application levelse6
Outcome
grain yield of ricee6
Direction
increasee6
Qualifier
With Orizo Plus® followed by one SHW or three hoe-weeding regimese6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of upland rice (var. NERICA 2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–292 · show in text ↑
e6

“With Orizo Plus® followed by one SHW or three hoe-weeding regimes, increasing N application levels resulted in a significant (p≤0.05) increase in grain yield of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1873–2038 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With Orizo Plus® applied alone, increasing N did not increase rice grain yield.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativae0
Treatment
increasing N application levelse7
Outcome
rice grain yielde7
Direction
did not increasee7
Qualifier
with Orizo Plus® applied alonee7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of upland rice (var. NERICA 2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–292 · show in text ↑
e7

“However, with Orizo Plus® applied alone, increasing N application levels did not increase rice grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2040–2146 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Orizo Plus® at 2.0 kg a.i./ha followed by one SHW at 6 WAS with N at 90 kg/ha is adequate to control weeds and increase rice yield in the transition zone of Nigeria.

Treatment
Orizo Plus® at 2.0 kg a.iha-1 followed by one SHW at 6 WAS integrated with N application at 90 kg ha-1e1
Outcome
control weeds and increase rice yielde1
Setting
rainforest-savannah transition zone of Nigeriae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield of upland rice (var. NERICA 2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–292 · show in text ↑
e1

“These results suggest that Orizo Plus® at 2.0 kg a.iha-1 followed by one SHW at 6 WAS integrated with N application at 90 kg ha-1 is adequate to effectively control weeds and increase rice yield in the rainforest-savannah transition zone of Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2148–2396 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 17 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

511 papers: 402 positive, 109 negative or no effect

401 papers in the same direction as this paper · 101 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

herbicide · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

603 papers: 579 positive, 24 negative or no effect

578 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

599 papers more in this group

See all 603 papers →

herbicide · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

802 papers: 725 positive, 77 negative or no effect

724 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

798 papers more in this group

See all 802 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.