Paper · 2023 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Impact of Nano NPK Fertilizer and Humic Acid Application on Vegetative Growth of Three Strawberry Cultivars

Raghad Adnan Ali Al-Qady; Nabil Mohammad Ameen Alimam

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract The experiments was carried out in an unheated Plastic house unit of the Department of Horticulture and Landscape Design / College of Agriculture and Forestry / University of Mosul for the years 2021-2022 with the aim of enhancement of vegetative growth of three cultivars of Strawberry, Festival, Ruby Gem and Liberation D, Orleans. Factorial experiment according to the split-plot system so that the cultivars were placed in the main-plot, while the nano-fertilization treatments NPK with three concentration 0, 1.5 and 3 g.l −1 and humic acid with three levels 0, 3 and 6 ml.l −1 put in the sup-plot using Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replicates, and means were compared by Duncan’s test at 5% level. Results of the experiment could be summarized as follow: The cultivars under this study were differed in some of the studied traits, especially the significant superiority of the strawberry cultivar Liberation D, Orleans over the two strawberry cultivars Festival and Ruby Gem in the number of leaves, the area of one leaf, the leaf area of a plant, and the dry weight of vegetative system. Cultivars Festival and Liberation D, Orleans were superiority on Ruby Gem in leaf chlorophyll content and root dry weight. Foliar fertilization with nano NPK fertilizer, especially at a concentration of 3 gm..l −1 , led to a significant increase in the number of leaves and dry weight of vegetative system, while the concentration of 1.5 gm.l −1 was significantly increased in the area of one leaf and the leafy area of strawberry plant compared to the control treatment. Fertilization with humic acid at the level of 6 ml.l −1 was significantly increased in the number of leaves, the concentration of chlorophyll in the leaves, the dry weight of vegetative and roots system, the area of one leaf and the leaf area of plant compared to the control treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Liberation D, Orleans exceeded Festival and Ruby Gem in leaf number, individual leaf area and plant leaf area.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Material
Liberation D, Orleanse0
Outcome
number of leaves, the area of one leaf, the leaf area of a plante0
Direction
superioritye0
Comparator
Festival and Ruby Geme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the significant superiority of the strawberry cultivar Liberation D, Orleans over the two strawberry cultivars Festival and Ruby Gem in the number of leaves, the area of one leaf, the leaf area of a plant, and the dry weight of vegetative system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Liberation D, Orleans exceeded Festival and Ruby Gem in vegetative dry weight.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Material
Liberation D, Orleanse0
Outcome
dry weight of vegetative systeme0
Direction
superioritye0
Comparator
Festival and Ruby Geme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the significant superiority of the strawberry cultivar Liberation D, Orleans over the two strawberry cultivars Festival and Ruby Gem in the number of leaves, the area of one leaf, the leaf area of a plant, and the dry weight of vegetative system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Festival and Liberation D, Orleans exceeded Ruby Gem in leaf chlorophyll content and root dry weight.

Material
Festival and Liberation D, Orleanse0
Outcome
leaf chlorophyll content and root dry weighte0
Direction
superioritye0
Comparator
Ruby Geme0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivars Festival and Liberation D, Orleans were superiority on Ruby Gem in leaf chlorophyll content and root dry weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano NPK at 3 gm..l −1 increased leaf number and vegetative dry weight.

Treatment
nano NPK fertilizer, especially at a concentration of 3 gm..l −1e0
Outcome
number of leaves and dry weight of vegetative systeme0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar fertilization with nano NPK fertilizer, especially at a concentration of 3 gm..l −1 , led to a significant increase in the number of leaves and dry weight of vegetative system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1431 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano NPK at 1.5 gm.l −1 increased individual and plant leaf area over control.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
concentration of 1.5 gm.l −1e0
Outcome
area of one leaf and the leafy area of strawberry plante0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the concentration of 1.5 gm.l −1 was significantly increased in the area of one leaf and the leafy area of strawberry plant compared to the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1439–1597 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid at 6 ml.l −1 increased leaf number, chlorophyll, and vegetative and root dry weights over control.

Treatment
humic acid at the level of 6 ml.l −1e0
Outcome
number of leaves, the concentration of chlorophyll in the leaves, the dry weight of vegetative and roots systeme0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilization with humic acid at the level of 6 ml.l −1 was significantly increased in the number of leaves, the concentration of chlorophyll in the leaves, the dry weight of vegetative and roots system, the area of one leaf and the leaf area of plant compared to the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1598–1884 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid at 6 ml.l −1 increased individual and plant leaf area over control.

Treatment
humic acid at the level of 6 ml.l −1e0
Outcome
the area of one leaf and the leaf area of plante0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilization with humic acid at the level of 6 ml.l −1 was significantly increased in the number of leaves, the concentration of chlorophyll in the leaves, the dry weight of vegetative and roots system, the area of one leaf and the leaf area of plant compared to the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1598–1884 · show in text ↑

transgenic · growth · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

other · growth · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 24 positive, 1 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

fertilization · growth · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

141 papers: 117 positive, 24 negative or no effect

116 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

137 papers more in this group

See all 141 papers →

other · physiology: pigments · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree

24 papers: 24 positive, 0 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.