Paper · 2023 · Heliyon

Loading of zinc and iron in grains of different wheat genotypes in the calcareous and floodplain soils of Bangladesh

Mahbubur Rahman Khan; Md Jahiruddin; Md Abdullah Al Mahmud; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Major malnutrition in Bangladesh is zinc (Zn) and iron (Fe) deficiency as most people commonly depend on cereals, chiefly rice and wheat. The main objectives are to enhance Zn and Fe concentrations through the use of selected varieties and the application of respective fertilizers. Field experiments were conducted at Bangladesh Agricultural University (BAU) farm, Mymensingh (AEZ 9, non-calcareous soil) and at Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture (BINA) substation, Ishwardi (AEZ 11, calcareous soil) for two consecutive wheat seasons (2014–15 and 2015–16) with 10 varieties and 15 advanced lines. Varieties BARI Gom 25, 27, 28 & 29 and breeding lines Vijay, HPYT-5, 15 & 21 and BL-1883 have been recognized as Zn-enriched wheat varieties (24–30 μg g −1 ). Among the genotypes, Zn further increased by 4–8 μg g −1 due to Zn fertilization. Concerning Fe-enriched wheat genotypes (24–30 μg g −1 ), five varieties viz. Shatabdi, Prodip, BARI Gom 25 & 28 and Sufi, and four lines such as HPYT-12, BL-1883, BL-1040 and Fery-60 have been identified. The grain Fe concentration of wheat genotypes increased when Fe was added, the increment being 6–12 μg g −1 . A positive relationship between Zn and N is observed with increased protein content. The grain yield of wheat was increased by 3.8–25.7% due to Zn application over the varieties and locations but Fe addition had no effect. The result of the current study showed that a potential breeding line with appropriate fertilization can improve Zn and Fe levels in wheat grain, without incurring loss to wheat yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn-enriched wheat varieties and breeding lines had grain Zn concentrations of 24–30 μg g −1.

Material
BARI Gom 25, 27, 28 & 29 and breeding lines Vijay, HPYT-5, 15 & 21 and BL-1883e1
Outcome
Zn-enriched wheat varietiese1
Value
24–30 μg g −1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“different wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–63 · show in text ↑
e1

“Varieties BARI Gom 25, 27, 28 & 29 and breeding lines Vijay, HPYT-5, 15 & 21 and BL-1883 have been recognized as Zn-enriched wheat varieties (24–30 μg g −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–765 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn fertilization further increased grain Zn concentration in the genotypes by 4–8 μg g −1.

Treatment
Zn fertilizatione2
Outcome
Zne2
Direction
increasede2
Value
4–8 μg g −1e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“different wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–63 · show in text ↑
e2

“Among the genotypes, Zn further increased by 4–8 μg g −1 due to Zn fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–847 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shatabdi, Prodip, BARI Gom 25 & 28 and Sufi were identified as Fe-enriched wheat varieties with grain Fe of 24–30 μg g −1.

Material
Shatabdi, Prodip, BARI Gom 25 & 28 and Sufie3
Outcome
Fe-enriched wheat genotypese3
Value
24–30 μg g −1e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“different wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–63 · show in text ↑
e3

“Concerning Fe-enriched wheat genotypes (24–30 μg g −1 ), five varieties viz. Shatabdi, Prodip, BARI Gom 25 & 28 and Sufi, and four lines such as HPYT-12, BL-1883, BL-1040 and Fery-60 have been identified”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1052 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HPYT-12, BL-1883, BL-1040 and Fery-60 were identified as Fe-enriched wheat breeding lines with grain Fe of 24–30 μg g −1.

Material
HPYT-12, BL-1883, BL-1040 and Fery-60e3
Outcome
Fe-enriched wheat genotypese3
Value
24–30 μg g −1e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“different wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–63 · show in text ↑
e3

“Concerning Fe-enriched wheat genotypes (24–30 μg g −1 ), five varieties viz. Shatabdi, Prodip, BARI Gom 25 & 28 and Sufi, and four lines such as HPYT-12, BL-1883, BL-1040 and Fery-60 have been identified”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1052 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe addition increased the grain Fe concentration of wheat genotypes by 6–12 μg g −1.

Treatment
Fe was addede4
Outcome
grain Fe concentratione4
Direction
increasede4
Value
6–12 μg g −1e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“different wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–63 · show in text ↑
e4

“The grain Fe concentration of wheat genotypes increased when Fe was added, the increment being 6–12 μg g −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1161 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain Zn and N showed a positive relationship in wheat, with increased protein content.

Compound
Ne5
Outcome
relationship between Zn and Ne5
Direction
positivee5
Qualifier
increased protein contente5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“different wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–63 · show in text ↑
e5

“A positive relationship between Zn and N is observed with increased protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1247 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn application increased wheat grain yield by 3.8–25.7% over the varieties and locations.

Treatment
Zn applicatione6
Outcome
grain yielde6
Direction
increasede6
Value
3.8–25.7%e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“different wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–63 · show in text ↑
e6

“The grain yield of wheat was increased by 3.8–25.7% due to Zn application over the varieties and locations but Fe addition had no effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1385 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe addition had no effect on wheat grain yield.

Treatment
Fe additione6
Outcome
grain yielde6
Direction
no effecte6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“different wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–63 · show in text ↑
e6

“The grain yield of wheat was increased by 3.8–25.7% due to Zn application over the varieties and locations but Fe addition had no effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1385 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A breeding line with appropriate fertilization can improve Zn and Fe levels in wheat grain without loss of wheat yield.

Outcome
Zn and Fe levels in wheat graine7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“different wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–63 · show in text ↑
e7

“a potential breeding line with appropriate fertilization can improve Zn and Fe levels in wheat grain, without incurring loss to wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1570 · show in text ↑

iron atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

74 papers: 61 positive, 13 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

iron atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

99 papers: 92 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 92 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Foliar chelated zinc yielded about two-fold greater shoot zinc concentrations than root zinc supply or foliar ZnO.

    Zinc Mobility in Wheat: Uptake and Distribution of Zinc Applied to Leaves or Roots · 2001 · compared with plants supplied with Zn in the root environment or via foliar spray of ZnO

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
  3. positive

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.