Abstract
Field trials were undertaken to investigate the impact of integrated nutrient management on wheat yield and economic aspects during the Rabi season of 2021-22 and 2022-23. The experimentation took place at the student's instructional farm of Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture & Technology in Kanpur. The study encompassed 11 treatment combinations, organized in a randomized block design with three replications. These treatments involved varying combinations of inorganic fertilizers, organic manure, and biofertilizers. The cultivation of wheat variety HD-2967 was carried out in accordance with the suggested agronomic practices. Based on the outcomes derived from the investigation, it can be deduced that among the various productivity parameters, the treatment labeled as T10 [100 % NPK + S40 + Zn5 + Fe10 + Azotobacter + PSB + 5 ton FYM] exhibited the highest grain yield of 48.60 and 49.93 quintals per hectare, straw yield of 63.15 and 67.53 quintals per hectare, and biological yield of 111.75 and 117.46 quintals per hectare across both years of experimentation. For economic factors, the treatment T10 also yielded the highest gross returns of ₹ 1,40,190 and ₹154,632 during the first year (2021-22) and second year (2022-23) of the experiment, respectively. Moreover, the treatment T7 [100 % NPK + Zn5] showcased the maximum benefit-cost ratio (B:C ratio) of 2.26 and 2.39. It is noteworthy that the highest costs of cultivation were observed in the treatment T10, amounting to ₹ 53,805 in the first year and ₹ 55,561 in the second year. This treatment encompassed a combination of 100 % NPK, S40, Zn5, Fe10, Azotobacter, PSB, and 5 tons of FYM.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
T10 gave the highest wheat grain yields of 48.60 and 49.93 quintals per hectare in the two years.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- T10 [100 % NPK + S40 + Zn5 + Fe10 + Azotobacter + PSB + 5 ton FYM]e0
- Interactor
- Azotobacter
Azotobactere0symbiont - Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 48.60 and 49.93 quintals per hectaree0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“T10 [100 % NPK + S40 + Zn5 + Fe10 + Azotobacter + PSB + 5 ton FYM] exhibited the highest grain yield of 48.60 and 49.93 quintals per hectare”
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
T10 gave the highest wheat straw yields of 63.15 and 67.53 quintals per hectare.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- T10e1
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere1symbiont
- Outcome
- straw yielde0
- Direction
- higheste1
- Value
- 63.15 and 67.53 quintals per hectaree0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“straw yield of 63.15 and 67.53 quintals per hectare”
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e1“T10 [100 % NPK + S40 + Zn5 + Fe10 + Azotobacter + PSB + 5 ton FYM] exhibited the highest grain yield”
Claim · model-written summary
T10 gave the highest wheat biological yields of 111.75 and 117.46 quintals per hectare.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- T10e1
- Outcome
- biological yielde0
- Direction
- higheste1
- Value
- 111.75 and 117.46 quintals per hectaree0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“biological yield of 111.75 and 117.46 quintals per hectare”
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e1“T10 [100 % NPK + S40 + Zn5 + Fe10 + Azotobacter + PSB + 5 ton FYM] exhibited the highest grain yield”
Claim · model-written summary
T10 generated the highest gross returns of ₹ 1,40,190 and ₹154,632 in successive years.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- T10e0
- Outcome
- gross returnse0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- ₹ 1,40,190 and ₹154,632e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“treatment T10 also yielded the highest gross returns of ₹ 1,40,190 and ₹154,632”
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
T7 had the maximum benefit-cost ratios of 2.26 and 2.39.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- T7 [100 % NPK + Zn5]e0
- Outcome
- benefit-cost ratioe0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 2.26 and 2.39e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“treatment T7 [100 % NPK + Zn5] showcased the maximum benefit-cost ratio (B:C ratio) of 2.26 and 2.39”
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
T10 had the highest cultivation costs, ₹ 53,805 and ₹ 55,561 in successive years.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- T10e0
- Outcome
- costs of cultivatione0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- ₹ 53,805e0
- Qualifier
- ₹ 55,561e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“highest costs of cultivation were observed in the treatment T10, amounting to ₹ 53,805 in the first year and ₹ 55,561 in the second year”
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
The same questions in other papers
Azotobacter · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
86 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- positive
84 papers more in this group
See all 88 papers →fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
3,434 papers more in this group
See all 3,438 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.