Paper · 2015 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Effect of salinity on relative water content and pigment concentration in three genotypes of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

Licet Chávez Suárez; Alexander Álvarez Fonseca; Ramiro Ramírez Fernández

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

This work was developed at the Agricultural Research Institute “Jorge Dimitrov” in November 2011, with the aim of studying the effect of salinity on the relative water content (RWC) and the concentration of pigments in plants of three varieties of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.): HOL-17 HOL-35 HOL-74, using a saline soil (EC 5.2 dS.m-1) and a non-saline soil as control. The Relative Water Content (RWC) was determined by the method described by Yamasaki and Rebello and the concentration of pigment by the methodology of Lichtenthaler and Wellburn. The results indicated a significant decrease in the RWC in the saline treatment, relative to control, in the three studied varieties. The content of chlorophyll b was affected in the three varieties under saline conditions, while HOL-17 and HOL-74 varieties exhibited a significant increase in the concentration of carotenoids, suggesting a protective mechanism of chlorophyll photooxidation induced by salt stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Saline treatment significantly decreased relative water content in all three bean varieties relative to control.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
saline treatmente0
Outcome
RWCe0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
three studied varietiese0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“The results indicated a significant decrease in the RWC in the saline treatment, relative to control, in the three studied varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–682 · show in text ↑
t0

“bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saline conditions affected chlorophyll b content in all three bean varieties, without a reported direction.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
saline conditionse0
Outcome
content of chlorophyll be0
Qualifier
three varietiese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The content of chlorophyll b was affected in the three varieties under saline conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–772 · show in text ↑
t0

“bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

HOL-17 had a significant increase in carotenoid concentration under salinity.

Taxon
beant0
Material
HOL-17e0
Treatment
saline conditionse1
Outcome
concentration of carotenoidse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“HOL-17 and HOL-74 varieties exhibited a significant increase in the concentration of carotenoids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–876 · show in text ↑
e1

“under saline conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–772 · show in text ↑
t0

“bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

HOL-74 had a significant increase in carotenoid concentration under salinity.

Taxon
beant0
Material
HOL-74e0
Treatment
saline conditionse1
Outcome
concentration of carotenoidse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“HOL-17 and HOL-74 varieties exhibited a significant increase in the concentration of carotenoids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–876 · show in text ↑
e1

“under saline conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–772 · show in text ↑
t0

“bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–121 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased carotenoids were interpreted as a protective mechanism against chlorophyll photooxidation under salt stress.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
salt stresse0
Outcome
chlorophyll photooxidatione0
Qualifier
protective mechanisme0

Verbatim

e0

“suggesting a protective mechanism of chlorophyll photooxidation induced by salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–964 · show in text ↑
t0

“bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–121 · show in text ↑

salinity · physiology: water · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

21 papers: 0 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

salinity · physiology: pigments · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

22 papers: 3 positive, 19 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.