Paper · 2023 · Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science

Effect of soil compaction and cover crop management on soil physical quality, biomass production and corn and soybean yield

João de Andrade Bonetti; Márcio Renato Nunes; Jessé Rodrigo Fink; et al.

8
claims
11
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

No-till with cover crop (CC) has been marketed to growers as a sustainable way to increase soil quality and crop yields. Our goal was to better understand the effect of CC management strategies on crop yield and mitigation of soil compaction. The compaction treatments were: four (C4) and eight (C8) wheel passes of a tractor, and without additional compaction (C0). CCs in autumn/winter were Italian ryegrass (IR) hay, IR as CC, and mix of IR and forage radish as CC. In the spring/summer, corn and soybean were cultivated. The reduction of hydraulic conductivity (0–6 cm depth) after first season in the IR hay was 74.9% in C4 and 96.2% in C8 comparted with C0. Overall, harvested CC has limited capacity to respond to compaction, decreasing root growth (root biomass of 2191, 2753, and 3744 kg ha−1, IR hay, IR CC, and mix, respectively). Further, the negative effects of compaction on crop yield were modest, probably because of the low axle loads and contact stresses; high inherent structural stability of Oxisols; and permanent no-till and CC roots which favored soil structure stability. Future works should use higher axle loads and surface stresses and a control treatment without CC.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four wheel passes reduced soil hydraulic conductivity by 74.9% relative to no additional compaction under IR hay.

Treatment
C4e0
Outcome
hydraulic conductivitye0
Direction
reductione0
Value
74.9%e0
Qualifier
IR haye0
Comparator
C0e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction of hydraulic conductivity (0–6 cm depth) after first season in the IR hay was 74.9% in C4 and 96.2% in C8 comparted with C0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–662 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eight wheel passes reduced soil hydraulic conductivity by 96.2% relative to no additional compaction under IR hay.

Treatment
C8e0
Outcome
hydraulic conductivitye0
Direction
reductione0
Value
96.2%e0
Qualifier
IR haye0
Comparator
C0e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction of hydraulic conductivity (0–6 cm depth) after first season in the IR hay was 74.9% in C4 and 96.2% in C8 comparted with C0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–662 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IR hay cover cropping produced 2191 kg ha−1 root biomass under compaction.

Taxon
IRe0
Material
IR haye0
Outcome
root biomasse0
Direction
decreasinge0
Value
2191e0

Verbatim

e0

“decreasing root growth (root biomass of 2191, 2753, and 3744 kg ha−1, IR hay, IR CC, and mix, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–840 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IR cover cropping produced 2753 kg ha−1 root biomass under compaction.

Taxon
IRe0
Material
IR CCe0
Outcome
root biomasse0
Direction
decreasinge0
Value
2753e0

Verbatim

e0

“decreasing root growth (root biomass of 2191, 2753, and 3744 kg ha−1, IR hay, IR CC, and mix, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–840 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mixed cover crop produced 3744 kg ha−1 root biomass under compaction.

Taxon
mixe0
Material
mixe0
Outcome
root biomasse0
Direction
decreasinge0
Value
3744 kg ha−1e0

Verbatim

e0

“decreasing root growth (root biomass of 2191, 2753, and 3744 kg ha−1, IR hay, IR CC, and mix, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–840 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compaction had modest negative effects on crop yield.

Treatment
compactione0
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
negative effectse0
Qualifier
modeste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the negative effects of compaction on crop yield were modest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–911 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn and soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–117 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend future studies use higher axle loads and surface stresses.

Outcome
use higher axle loads and surface stressese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Future works should use higher axle loads and surface stresses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1158 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn and soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–117 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend a control without a cover crop.

Outcome
a control treatment without CCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a control treatment without CC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1193 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn and soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–117 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

390 papers: 264 positive, 126 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 264 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

386 papers more in this group

See all 390 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.