Paper · 2022 · Annals of Plant and Soil Research

Effect of straw mulching and irrigation on physiological activities, yield of maize (Zea mays L.) and soil physical properties under available soil moisture depletion conditions in Mollisols

MANEESH BHATT

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during winter season of 2016-17 and 2017-18 to evaluate the effect of residue mulch and irrigation on the physiological response and yield of maize and soil physical properties at G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar. The experiment was laid-out in split-plot design which includes three irrigation scheduling in main plots and four residue mulch practices in sub plots. Soil temperature at 15 cm enhanced by 0.6-9.8 0C under mulch and by 0.7-1.2 0C with irrigation at 20% DASM over other irrigation levels. Mulch significantly decreased bulk density by 1.43-3.59% while increased saturated hydraulic conductivity by 3.8-41.0% and mean weight diameter by 6.0-20.0%. Irrigation at less depletion of available soil moisture favoured soil physical properties. Mulch and increase in irrigation frequency tended to increase in relative water content and transpiration rate while decreased leaf diffusive resistance. No noticeable differences in leaf temperature were observed under mulch and irrigation. Green gram straw mulch and irrigation given at 20% DASM produced 2.6-14.2 % and 1.3-9.2% higher grain yield, respectively. Combined application of green gram straw mulch @ 5 t ha-1 along with irrigation at 20% DASM was found most beneficial for maintaining favourable soil environment and can be recommended for obtaining higher maize yield in Mollisols.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch raised soil temperature at 15 cm by 0.6–9.8 °C.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
mulche0
Outcome
Soil temperature at 15 cme0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
0.6-9.8 0Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil temperature at 15 cm enhanced by 0.6-9.8 0C under mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–490 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 20% DASM raised soil temperature by 0.7–1.2 °C.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
irrigation at 20% DASMe0
Outcome
Soil temperaturee0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
0.7-1.2 0Ce0
Comparator
other irrigation levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil temperature at 15 cm enhanced by 0.6-9.8 0C under mulch and by 0.7-1.2 0C with irrigation at 20% DASM over other irrigation levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–565 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch lowered bulk density by 1.43–3.59%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Mulche0
Outcome
bulk densitye0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
1.43-3.59%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mulch significantly decreased bulk density by 1.43-3.59%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–623 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch increased saturated hydraulic conductivity by 3.8–41.0%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Mulche0
Outcome
saturated hydraulic conductivitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3.8-41.0%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mulch significantly decreased bulk density by 1.43-3.59% while increased saturated hydraulic conductivity by 3.8-41.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–685 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch increased mean weight diameter by 6.0–20.0%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
straw mulchingt0
Outcome
mean weight diametere0
Value
6.0-20.0%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mean weight diameter by 6.0-20.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–723 · show in text ↑
t0

“straw mulching and irrigation on physiological activities, yield of maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at less soil-moisture depletion favored soil physical properties.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Irrigation at less depletion of available soil moisturee0
Outcome
soil physical propertiese0
Direction
favourede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation at less depletion of available soil moisture favoured soil physical properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–814 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch and more frequent irrigation tended to increase relative water content and transpiration rate.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Mulch and increase in irrigation frequencye0
Outcome
relative water content and transpiration ratee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mulch and increase in irrigation frequency tended to increase in relative water content and transpiration rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–926 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch and more frequent irrigation tended to decrease leaf diffusive resistance.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Mulch and increase in irrigation frequencye0
Outcome
leaf diffusive resistancee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mulch and increase in irrigation frequency tended to increase in relative water content and transpiration rate while decreased leaf diffusive resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf temperature showed no noticeable differences under mulch and irrigation.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
mulch and irrigatione0
Outcome
leaf temperaturee0
Direction
No noticeable differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No noticeable differences in leaf temperature were observed under mulch and irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1056 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green gram straw mulch produced 2.6–14.2% higher grain yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Green gram straw mulche0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.6-14.2 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Green gram straw mulch and irrigation given at 20% DASM produced 2.6-14.2 % and 1.3-9.2% higher grain yield, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1179 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 20% DASM produced 1.3–9.2% higher grain yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
irrigation given at 20% DASMe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.3-9.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Green gram straw mulch and irrigation given at 20% DASM produced 2.6-14.2 % and 1.3-9.2% higher grain yield, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1179 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–97 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend green gram straw mulch at 5 t ha-1 with irrigation at 20% DASM for higher maize yield in Mollisols.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
green gram straw mulch @ 5 t ha-1 along with irrigation at 20% DASMe0
Outcome
higher maize yielde0
Setting
Mollisolse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined application of green gram straw mulch @ 5 t ha-1 along with irrigation at 20% DASM was found most beneficial for maintaining favourable soil environment and can be recommended for obtaining higher maize yield in Mollisols”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1411 · show in text ↑

Vigna radiata var. radiata · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 24 positive, 1 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

mulching · physiology: gas exchange · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

irrigation · physiology: gas exchange · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

18 papers: 13 positive, 5 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

mulching · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

irrigation · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

irrigation · soil: physics · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

59 papers: 47 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

mulching · soil: physics · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

112 papers: 97 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 97 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

108 papers more in this group

See all 112 papers →

organic · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

373 papers: 330 positive, 43 negative or no effect

329 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

369 papers more in this group

See all 373 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.