Paper · 2023 · Horticulturae

Effects of Different Irrigation Rates on Remontant Strawberry Cultivars Grown in Soil

Micol Marcellini; Davide Raffaelli; Luca Mazzoni; et al.

7
claims
17
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The present study assessed the responses, in terms of vegetative, productive, qualitative, and nutritional features, of plants and berries of three remontant strawberry cultivars cultivated in soil and irrigated using three irrigation regimes: standard irrigation regime (W100), 20% (W80) less irrigation than the standard irrigation, and 40% (W60) less irrigation than the standard irrigation. The tested plants were “Albion”, “San Andreas”, and “Monterey”, which were cultivated in the east coast area of Marche, Italy. Specifically, the study examined the response of the genotype to irrigation deficit, highlighting the performance of the “Monterey” cultivar, which showed improvement in terms of fruit firmness, folate content, and antioxidant capacity at the W80 irrigation regime without a significant yield reduction. In all the cultivars, when irrigation was reduced by up to 20% of the standard irrigation regime (W100), there were no significant losses of yield or reduction in the fruits’ sensorial quality or antioxidant activity. The results showed that the standard irrigation regime (W100) commonly adopted by the farmers in the Marche area uses more water than necessary. With more accurate water management, it will be possible to save almost 226 m3 of water per hectare per cultivation cycle.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At W80 Monterey fruit firmness improved.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Material
“Monterey”e0
Treatment
W80 irrigation regimee0
Outcome
fruit firmnesse0
Direction
improvemente0
Comparator
standard irrigation regime (W100)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the “Monterey” cultivar, which showed improvement in terms of fruit firmness, folate content, and antioxidant capacity at the W80 irrigation regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–786 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“standard irrigation regime (W100), 20% (W80) less irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–304 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At W80 Monterey folate content improved.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Material
“Monterey”e0
Treatment
W80 irrigation regimee0
Outcome
folate contente0
Direction
improvemente0
Comparator
standard irrigation regime (W100)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the “Monterey” cultivar, which showed improvement in terms of fruit firmness, folate content, and antioxidant capacity at the W80 irrigation regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–786 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“standard irrigation regime (W100), 20% (W80) less irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–304 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At W80 Monterey antioxidant capacity improved.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Material
“Monterey”e0
Treatment
W80 irrigation regimee0
Outcome
antioxidant capacitye0
Direction
improvemente0
Comparator
standard irrigation regime (W100)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the “Monterey” cultivar, which showed improvement in terms of fruit firmness, folate content, and antioxidant capacity at the W80 irrigation regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–786 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“standard irrigation regime (W100), 20% (W80) less irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–304 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Across cultivars 20% less irrigation caused no significant yield loss.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
irrigation was reduced by up to 20%e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no significant lossese0
Comparator
standard irrigation regime (W100)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In all the cultivars, when irrigation was reduced by up to 20% of the standard irrigation regime (W100), there were no significant losses of yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across cultivars 20% less irrigation did not reduce fruit sensory quality or antioxidant activity.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
irrigation was reduced by up to 20%e0
Outcome
fruits’ sensorial quality or antioxidant activitye0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
standard irrigation regime (W100)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when irrigation was reduced by up to 20% of the standard irrigation regime (W100), there were no significant losses of yield or reduction in the fruits’ sensorial quality or antioxidant activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–1042 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–61 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The standard W100 irrigation regime uses more water than necessary.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Outcome
uses more water than necessarye0
Setting
Marchee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the standard irrigation regime (W100) commonly adopted by the farmers in the Marche area uses more water than necessary”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1187 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–61 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

More accurate water management could save almost 226 m3 per hectare per cultivation cycle.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Outcome
savee0
Value
almost 226 m3 of water per hectare per cultivation cyclee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With more accurate water management, it will be possible to save almost 226 m3 of water per hectare per cultivation cycle.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1311 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–61 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

65 papers: 40 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

irrigation · quality: postharvest · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

irrigation · molecular: metabolites · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

irrigation · quality: phytochemicals · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.