Abstract
A field experiment was conducted at AICRP on water management, Belavatagi, UAS, Dharwad, during 2013-14 on soil deficient in available nutrients to study the effect of irrigation and nutrient management approaches on maximizing productivity, and economics of maize (Zea mays L.)-chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cropping sequence under command area. The results revealed that, crop receiving irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE recorded significantly higher maize grain yield (70.80 q/ha) with higher gross return (Rs.88,924 ha-1), net return (Rs. 65,804 ha-1) and B-C ratio (3.84) compared to other treatment. However, in pooled analysis, the yields were on par with different irrigation levels. Among different level of boron applied to soil or through foliar application from 2 to 6 kg granubour/ha increased the yield over no boron application. But significant results obtained at 6 kg granubour/ha application and foliar application of 0.5 % of FeSO4 and 0.5 % of ZnSO4 with borax @ 0.1 % at 30 and 45 DAS. The interaction effects between irrigation and boron levels showed that, irrigating the crop at 0.8 IW/CPE along with foliar application of 0.5 % FeSO4 and 0.5 % ZnSO4 with borax @ 0.1 % at 30 and 45 DAS recorded higher yield, higher gross returns, net returns, B-C ratio and WUE over the treatments. But, it was on par with all the treatments that receive the boron either through soil or foliar application. During Rabi season chickpea was grown as succeeding crop after maize in Kharif the results showed that, irrigating at 0.8 IW/CPE with Granubor (boron) @ 6 kg/ha followed by growing of chickpea with 0.6 IW/CPE recorded significantly yield and economics.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE increased maize grain yield.
Zea maysNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“crop receiving irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE recorded significantly higher maize grain yield (70.80 q/ha)”
t0“maize (Zea mays L.)- chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cropping sequence”
e1“crop receiving irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE increased gross return.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“higher gross return (Rs.88,924 ha-1)”
t0“maize (Zea mays L.)- chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cropping sequence”
e1“crop receiving irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE increased net return.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“net return (Rs. 65,804 ha-1)”
t0“maize (Zea mays L.)- chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cropping sequence”
e1“crop receiving irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE increased the benefit-cost ratio.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“B-C ratio (3.84)”
t0“maize (Zea mays L.)- chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cropping sequence”
e1“crop receiving irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE”
Claim · model-written summary
Pooled yields were similar across irrigation levels.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the yields were on par with different irrigation levels”
t0“maize (Zea mays L.)- chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cropping sequence”
Claim · model-written summary
Boron application at 2 to 6 kg granubour/ha increased yield over no boron.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“from 2 to 6 kg granubour/ha increased the yield over no boron application”
t0“maize (Zea mays L.)- chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cropping sequence”
Claim · model-written summary
The specified boron and foliar micronutrient applications gave significant results.
- Treatment
- 6 kg granubour/ha application and foliar application of 0.5 % of FeSO4 and 0.5 % of ZnSO4 with borax @ 0.1 % at 30 and 45 DASe0
- Outcome
- resultse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“significant results obtained at 6 kg granubour/ha application and foliar application of 0.5 % of FeSO4 and 0.5 % of ZnSO4 with borax @ 0.1 % at 30 and 45 DAS”
t0“maize (Zea mays L.)- chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cropping sequence”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined irrigation and foliar application increased yield.
- Treatment
- irrigating the crop at 0.8 IW/CPE along with foliar application of 0.5 % FeSO4 and 0.5 % ZnSO4 with borax @ 0.1 % at 30 and 45 DASe0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- the treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“irrigating the crop at 0.8 IW/CPE along with foliar application of 0.5 % FeSO4 and 0.5 % ZnSO4 with borax @ 0.1 % at 30 and 45 DAS recorded higher yield, higher gross returns, net returns, B-C ratio and WUE over the treatments”
t0“maize (Zea mays L.)- chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cropping sequence”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined irrigation and foliar application increased gross returns.
- Treatment
- irrigating the crop at 0.8 IW/CPE along with foliar application of 0.5 % FeSO4 and 0.5 % ZnSO4 with borax @ 0.1 % at 30 and 45 DASe0
- Outcome
- gross returnse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- the treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“irrigating the crop at 0.8 IW/CPE along with foliar application of 0.5 % FeSO4 and 0.5 % ZnSO4 with borax @ 0.1 % at 30 and 45 DAS recorded higher yield, higher gross returns, net returns, B-C ratio and WUE over the treatments”
t0“maize (Zea mays L.)- chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cropping sequence”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined irrigation and foliar application increased net returns.
- Treatment
- irrigating the crop at 0.8 IW/CPE along with foliar application of 0.5 % FeSO4 and 0.5 % ZnSO4 with borax @ 0.1 % at 30 and 45 DASe0
- Outcome
- net returnse0
- Comparator
- the treatmentse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“irrigating the crop at 0.8 IW/CPE along with foliar application of 0.5 % FeSO4 and 0.5 % ZnSO4 with borax @ 0.1 % at 30 and 45 DAS recorded higher yield, higher gross returns, net returns, B-C ratio and WUE over the treatments”
t0“maize (Zea mays L.)- chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cropping sequence”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined irrigation and foliar application increased B-C ratio.
- Treatment
- irrigating the crop at 0.8 IW/CPE along with foliar application of 0.5 % FeSO4 and 0.5 % ZnSO4 with borax @ 0.1 % at 30 and 45 DASe0
- Outcome
- B-C ratioe0
- Comparator
- the treatmentse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“irrigating the crop at 0.8 IW/CPE along with foliar application of 0.5 % FeSO4 and 0.5 % ZnSO4 with borax @ 0.1 % at 30 and 45 DAS recorded higher yield, higher gross returns, net returns, B-C ratio and WUE over the treatments”
t0“maize (Zea mays L.)- chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cropping sequence”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined irrigation and foliar application increased WUE.
- Treatment
- irrigating the crop at 0.8 IW/CPE along with foliar application of 0.5 % FeSO4 and 0.5 % ZnSO4 with borax @ 0.1 % at 30 and 45 DASe0
- Outcome
- WUEe0
- Comparator
- the treatmentse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“irrigating the crop at 0.8 IW/CPE along with foliar application of 0.5 % FeSO4 and 0.5 % ZnSO4 with borax @ 0.1 % at 30 and 45 DAS recorded higher yield, higher gross returns, net returns, B-C ratio and WUE over the treatments”
t0“maize (Zea mays L.)- chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cropping sequence”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment was comparable with other boron treatments.
- Outcome
- on pare0
- Direction
- on pare0
- Comparator
- all the treatments that receive the boron either through soil or foliar applicatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“it was on par with all the treatments that receive the boron either through soil or foliar application”
t0“maize (Zea mays L.)- chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cropping sequence”
Claim · model-written summary
The maize-chickpea irrigation and boron sequence gave significant yield and economic results.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- chickpea with 0.6 IW/CPEe0
- Outcome
- yield and economicse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“irrigating at 0.8 IW/CPE with Granubor (boron) @ 6 kg/ha followed by growing of chickpea with 0.6 IW/CPE recorded significantly yield and economics”
t0“maize (Zea mays L.)- chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cropping sequence”
The same questions in other papers
zinc sulfate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
124 papers more in this group
See all 128 papers →borax · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →zinc sulfate · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
application · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
30 papers more in this group
See all 34 papers →irrigation · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
283 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
320 papers more in this group
See all 324 papers →application · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
574 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
625 papers more in this group
See all 629 papers →irrigation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
790 papers in the same direction as this paper · 209 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
1,012 papers more in this group
See all 1,016 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.