Paper · 2023 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

RESPONSE OF ZINC IN ALLUVIAL SOIL FOR HIGHER YIELD OF WHEAT

Singh, Vivek

8
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

In crop production, the importance of Zn was realized due to raising its deficiency from intensified agriculture, increasing prevalence of high yielding crop varieties, multiple cropping. These factors have combined to create large gaps between the soil Zn supply and crop requirements. The zinc deficiency in the soil adversely affects crop yield and nutritional quality. Zinc levels had significantly beneficial effect on the straw / dry matter yields of the rabi crops over control in both crop seasons. The best results in linseed, lentil and cabbage were obtained at 7.5 kg Zn ha-1, in wheat at 10 kg Zn per Ha and in berseem at 5 kg Zn per Ha. Zinc uptake was highest in wheat crop. The uptake of Zn by these crops increased significantly with its addition over control in both the years.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc increased straw and dry matter yields across rabi crops relative to control.

Treatment
Zinc levelse0
Outcome
straw / dry matter yieldse0
Direction
beneficiale0
Qualifier
both crop seasonse0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zinc levels had significantly beneficial effect on the straw / dry matter yields of the rabi crops over control in both crop seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–506 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Linseed had its best result at 7.5 kg Zn ha-1.

Taxon
linseede0
Treatment
7.5 kg Zn ha-1e0
Outcome
best resultse0
Direction
beste0

Verbatim

e0

“The best results in linseed, lentil and cabbage were obtained at 7.5 kg Zn ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–586 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lentil had its best result at 7.5 kg Zn ha-1.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
7.5 kg Zn ha-1e0
Outcome
best resultse0
Direction
beste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The best results in linseed, lentil and cabbage were obtained at 7.5 kg Zn ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–586 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cabbage had its best result at 7.5 kg Zn ha-1.

Treatment
7.5 kg Zn ha-1e0
Outcome
best resultse0
Direction
beste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The best results in linseed, lentil and cabbage were obtained at 7.5 kg Zn ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–586 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat had its best result at 10 kg Zn per Ha.

Treatment
10 kg Zn per Hae0
Outcome
wheat at 10 kg Zn per Hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in wheat at 10 kg Zn per Ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–615 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Berseem had its best result at 5 kg Zn per Ha.

Taxon
berseeme0
Treatment
5 kg Zn per Hae0
Outcome
berseem at 5 kg Zn per Hae0

Verbatim

e0

“in berseem at 5 kg Zn per Ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–648 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc uptake was highest in wheat among the tested crops.

Outcome
Zinc uptakee0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zinc uptake was highest in wheat crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–688 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Added zinc significantly increased uptake in the tested crops in both years.

Treatment
its additione0
Outcome
uptake of Zne0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
both the yearse0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The uptake of Zn by these crops increased significantly with its addition over control in both the years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–794 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.