Paper · 2023 · Phytopathologia Mediterranea

A synergic and compatible microbial-based consortium for biocontrol of Fusarium wilt of tomato

Venkidusamy Kavi SIDHARTHAN; Govindan POTHIRAJ; Vinayagamoorthy SURYAPRAKASH; et al.

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Bioconsortia, based on Chaetomium globosum (isolate CgCG-2), Pseudomonas putida (PpTS-1), Bacillus subtilis (BsS2BC-1), and Trichoderma harzianum (ThS17TH), were designed to develop eco-friendly alternatives for biocontrol of vascular wilt of tomato caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici (Fol). In vitro compatibilities of microbes in these consortia were assessed for growth, antagonism, and biocontrol-related gene expression. In these bioassays, the biocontrol isolates had positive interactions for the tested parameters. In pot experiments, seed and soil applications of culture suspensions of five different isolate mixtures were assessed, in comparisons with individual isolates, for efficacy in vascular wilt control after challenge inoculations with Fol under polyhouse conditions. Compared to experimental controls, the biocontrol isolate mixtures reduced vascular wilt incidence and promoted plant growth. PpTS-1 + CgCG-2 + ThS17TH was the most effective microbial consortium, giving 71% reduction of Fusarium wilt incidence compared to non-treated controls. This reduced incidence increased plant growth by 135%. Upregulation of genes encoding for allene oxide cyclase, pathogenesis-related proteins 3, and 5, and β-1,3-glucanase in tomato plants indicated that the reduction in vascular wilt by the consortia could be partly plant-mediated. This study provides new insights into the development of microbial-based consortia for the biocontrol of vascular wilt in tomato.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biocontrol isolates interacted positively in vitro for growth, antagonism, and biocontrol gene expression.

Outcome
positive interactionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biocontrol isolates had positive interactions for the tested parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–534 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isolate mixtures reduced vascular wilt incidence relative to experimental controls.

Treatment
biocontrol isolate mixturese0
Interactor
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersiciFusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersicie1pathogen
Outcome
vascular wilt incidencee0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
experimental controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to experimental controls, the biocontrol isolate mixtures reduced vascular wilt incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–899 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici (Fol)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–303 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isolate mixtures promoted tomato plant growth relative to controls.

Treatment
biocontrol isolate mixturese0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
promotede0
Comparator
experimental controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to experimental controls, the biocontrol isolate mixtures reduced vascular wilt incidence and promoted plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–925 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The PpTS-1, CgCG-2, and ThS17TH consortium reduced Fusarium wilt incidence by 71% versus untreated controls.

Treatment
PpTS-1 + CgCG-2 + ThS17THe0
Interactor
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersiciFusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersicie1pathogen
Outcome
Fusarium wilt incidencee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
71%e0
Comparator
non-treated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PpTS-1 + CgCG-2 + ThS17TH was the most effective microbial consortium, giving 71% reduction of Fusarium wilt incidence compared to non-treated controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1078 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici (Fol)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–303 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced wilt incidence with the consortium increased plant growth by 135%.

Treatment
PpTS-1 + CgCG-2 + ThS17THe1
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
135%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This reduced incidence increased plant growth by 135%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1133 · show in text ↑
e1

“PpTS-1 + CgCG-2 + ThS17TH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–952 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–94 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato defense gene upregulation suggests that consortium effects on wilt may partly involve plant mediation.

Gene
allene oxide cyclasee0
Outcome
reduction in vascular wilte0
Qualifier
could be partly plant-mediatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Upregulation of genes encoding for allene oxide cyclase, pathogenesis-related proteins 3, and 5, and β-1,3-glucanase in tomato plants indicated that the reduction in vascular wilt by the consortia could be partly plant-mediated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1362 · show in text ↑

biocontrol · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 28 positive, 1 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

biocontrol · Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.