Paper · 2023 · Agrosystems Geosciences & Environment

Synergistic effects of substrate inoculation with Pseudomonas strains on tomato phenology, yield, and selected human health‐related phytochemical compounds

Muazu Issifu; Labode Hospice Stevenson Naitchede; Elijah Miinda Ateka; et al.

13
claims
27
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Plant growth‐promoting rhizobacteria enhances nutritional availability during root colonization. Pseudomonas is the most popular bioinoculant due to its synergistic effects on plant development. This study evaluated the impact of four Pseudomonas strain substrate inoculations on tomato phenology, yield, and selected phytochemical components relevant to human health. The bacterial isolates have been characterized morphologically, biochemically, physiologically, and phylogenetically. Tomato plants on cocopeat substrate were inoculated individually with a bacterial suspension (optical density [OD] 600 2.0). Controls included nitrogen–phosphate–potassium (NPK) fertilizer and tap water. The greenhouse experiment was laid out in a completely randomized design with five replications. Data were taken 30, 60, 90, and 120 days after inoculation. All four bacterial isolates could fix nitrogen, solubilize phosphate, and potassium and synthesize indole acetic acid in vitro. The 16S rRNA of the strains BF1P2‐6, BF2P1‐2, BF2P5‐1, and BF4P2‐5 were identified as Pseudomonas putida Y22, Pseudomonas taiwanensis GDLB‐32, Pseudomonas monteilii Bil‐NOR3_15, and Pseudomonas fluorescens Y5, respectively. The strains grew best at pH 7, NaCl 0.0%, and 35°C. Inoculated tomato plants tested over a period of 4 months in a greenhouse showed a significant increase in growth, leaf variables, and yield attributes. Pseudomonas ‐inoculated plants were the highest in tannins (46.96 mg/100 g), followed by lycopene (45.57 mg/100 g) and Carotenoids (31.87 mg/100 g). The antioxidant activity of tomato fruit extracts showed the potential for free radicals scavenging activity against 2, 2‐diphenyl‐1‐picrylhydrazyl. Conditions such as pH and electrical conductivity for the cocopeat substrate were within acceptable limits. Bacterial strains and NPK increased cocopeat nitrogen, phosphate, and potassium bioavailability. This study reveals that Pseudomonas strains improve plant growth, yield, and health‐related phytochemical substances in tomato fruits, which could broaden their application in fruit and vegetable crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All four bacterial isolates fixed nitrogen, solubilized phosphate and potassium, and synthesized IAA in vitro.

Interactor
bacterial isolatese0symbiont
Outcome
fix nitrogen, solubilize phosphate, and potassium and synthesize indole acetic acide0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All four bacterial isolates could fix nitrogen, solubilize phosphate, and potassium and synthesize indole acetic acid in vitro.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–984 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BF1P2-6 was identified as Pseudomonas putida Y22.

Interactor
Pseudomonas putida Y22Pseudomonas putidae0symbiont
Outcome
identified as Pseudomonas putida Y22e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BF1P2‐6, BF2P1‐2, BF2P5‐1, and BF4P2‐5 were identified as Pseudomonas putida Y22, Pseudomonas taiwanensis GDLB‐32, Pseudomonas monteilii Bil‐NOR3_15, and Pseudomonas fluorescens Y5, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1208 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BF2P1-2 was identified as Pseudomonas taiwanensis GDLB-32.

Interactor
Pseudomonas taiwanensis GDLB‐32Pseudomonas taiwanensise0symbiont
Outcome
Pseudomonas taiwanensis GDLB‐32e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BF1P2‐6, BF2P1‐2, BF2P5‐1, and BF4P2‐5 were identified as Pseudomonas putida Y22, Pseudomonas taiwanensis GDLB‐32, Pseudomonas monteilii Bil‐NOR3_15, and Pseudomonas fluorescens Y5, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1208 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BF2P5-1 was identified as Pseudomonas monteilii Bil-NOR3_15.

Interactor
Pseudomonas monteilii Bil‐NOR3_15Pseudomonas monteiliie0symbiont
Outcome
Pseudomonas monteilii Bil‐NOR3_15e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BF1P2‐6, BF2P1‐2, BF2P5‐1, and BF4P2‐5 were identified as Pseudomonas putida Y22, Pseudomonas taiwanensis GDLB‐32, Pseudomonas monteilii Bil‐NOR3_15, and Pseudomonas fluorescens Y5, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1208 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BF4P2-5 was identified as Pseudomonas fluorescens Y5.

Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescens Y5Pseudomonas fluorescense0symbiont
Outcome
Pseudomonas fluorescens Y5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BF1P2‐6, BF2P1‐2, BF2P5‐1, and BF4P2‐5 were identified as Pseudomonas putida Y22, Pseudomonas taiwanensis GDLB‐32, Pseudomonas monteilii Bil‐NOR3_15, and Pseudomonas fluorescens Y5, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1208 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The bacterial strains grew best at pH 7, zero NaCl, and 35°C.

Interactor
strainse0symbiont
Outcome
strains grew beste0
Value
35°Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The strains grew best at pH 7, NaCl 0.0%, and 35°C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1260 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated greenhouse tomato plants showed significantly increased growth, leaf variables, and yield attributes.

Treatment
Inoculatede0
Outcome
growth, leaf variables, and yield attributese0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
Controlse1
Setting
greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculated tomato plants tested over a period of 4 months in a greenhouse showed a significant increase in growth, leaf variables, and yield attributes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1413 · show in text ↑
e1

“Controls included nitrogen–phosphate–potassium (NPK) fertilizer and tap water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–699 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated tomato plants had tannin content of 46.96 mg/100 g.

Interactor
PseudomonasPseudomonase0symbiont
Outcome
tanninse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
46.96 mg/100 ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pseudomonas ‐inoculated plants were the highest in tannins (46.96 mg/100 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1489 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated tomato plants had lycopene content of 45.57 mg/100 g.

Outcome
lycopenee0
Value
45.57 mg/100 ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by lycopene (45.57 mg/100 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1491–1528 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated tomato plants had carotenoid content of 31.87 mg/100 g.

Outcome
Carotenoidse0
Value
31.87 mg/100 ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and Carotenoids (31.87 mg/100 g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1529–1562 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato fruit extracts showed potential free-radical scavenging activity.

Outcome
free radicals scavenging activitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The antioxidant activity of tomato fruit extracts showed the potential for free radicals scavenging activity against 2, 2‐diphenyl‐1‐picrylhydrazyl.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1563–1711 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cocopeat pH and electrical conductivity were within acceptable limits.

Outcome
pH and electrical conductivity for the cocopeat substratee0
Direction
within acceptable limitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conditions such as pH and electrical conductivity for the cocopeat substrate were within acceptable limits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1712–1819 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial strains and NPK increased nitrogen, phosphate, and potassium bioavailability in cocopeat.

Treatment
Bacterial strains and NPKe0
Outcome
cocopeat nitrogen, phosphate, and potassium bioavailabilitye0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
tap watere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacterial strains and NPK increased cocopeat nitrogen, phosphate, and potassium bioavailability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1820–1916 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“Controls included nitrogen–phosphate–potassium (NPK) fertilizer and tap water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–699 · show in text ↑

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 36 positive, 8 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

127 papers: 107 positive, 20 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

123 papers more in this group

See all 127 papers →

inoculation · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

201 papers: 172 positive, 29 negative or no effect

171 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

197 papers more in this group

See all 201 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.