Paper · 2023 · Scientia Horticulturae

Effect of deficit irrigation and mulching on the agronomic and physiological response of mandarin trees as strategies to cope with water scarcity in a semi-arid climate

Pablo Berríos; Abdelmalek Temnani; Susana Zapata-García; et al.

6
claims
17
verbatim quotes
32
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

In order to increase the crop water productivity (WPc) of the agricultural systems, and to support farmers in minimizing uncertainty of water availability, we conducted a three-years experiment in a commercial adult mandarin orchard to quantify the effect of sustained and severe deficit irrigation in combination with the use of geotextile mulch on the agronomic and physiological response of the crop. For this purpose, five treatments were tested: (i) a control (CTL) irrigated at 100% of the crop evapotranspiration (ETc) during the entire season; ii) sustained deficit irrigation (SDI), irrigated at ∼70% of CTL; (iii) regulated deficit irrigation (RDI), irrigated as SDI, except during the initial period of the second fruit growth stage, when trees were irrigated at 35% of the CTL, maintaining a moderate water stress level of around –1.5 MPa of stem water potential (Ψs), until fruits reached 70% of their final size. In addition, two geotextile mulch treatments were established, using the same irrigation criteria as the SDI and RDI treatments. The available irrigation water supplied about 66% of the crop evapotranspiration, but if it is managed under a SDI regime with the incorporation of mulching it is possible to increase the crop sustainability and reduce the pressure over the water resources. Since SDI did not reduce the yield with respect to the CTL treatment, it increased WPc by 35% and the incorporation of mulch significantly increased the water status of the soil and the crop, thus reducing the intensity of water stress by 18% on average, which was expressed in a higher leaf gas exchange rate and was also a factor that significantly increased crop production variables and WPc.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sustained deficit irrigation did not reduce mandarin yield versus control.

Taxon
mandarin treest0
Treatment
SDIe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not reducee0
Comparator
CTL treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“SDI did not reduce the yield with respect to the CTL treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1382 · show in text ↑
t0

“mandarin trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sustained deficit irrigation increased crop water productivity by 35%.

Taxon
mandarin treest0
Treatment
SDIt1
Outcome
WPce0
Direction
increasede0
Value
35%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“it increased WPc by 35%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1407 · show in text ↑
t0

“mandarin trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–103 · show in text ↑
t1

“Since SDI did not reduce the yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1348 · show in text ↑
e1

“the incorporation of mulch significantly increased the water status of the soil and the crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1504 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch significantly increased soil and crop water status.

Taxon
mandarin treest0
Treatment
mulche0
Outcome
water status of the soil and the crope0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the incorporation of mulch significantly increased the water status of the soil and the crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1504 · show in text ↑
t0

“mandarin trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch reduced water stress intensity by 18% on average.

Taxon
mandarin treest0
Treatment
mulche1
Outcome
intensity of water stresse0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
18%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“reducing the intensity of water stress by 18% on average”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1511–1567 · show in text ↑
t0

“mandarin trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“the incorporation of mulch significantly increased the water status of the soil and the crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1504 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch was associated with higher leaf gas exchange.

Taxon
mandarin treest0
Treatment
mulche1
Outcome
leaf gas exchange ratee0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“which was expressed in a higher leaf gas exchange rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1569–1623 · show in text ↑
t0

“mandarin trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“the incorporation of mulch significantly increased the water status of the soil and the crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1504 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch significantly increased crop production variables and water productivity.

Taxon
mandarin treest0
Treatment
mulche1
Outcome
crop production variables and WPce0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“significantly increased crop production variables and WPc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1651–1708 · show in text ↑
t0

“mandarin trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“the incorporation of mulch significantly increased the water status of the soil and the crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1504 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Citrus reticulata (tangerine)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

mulching · physiology: water · Citrus reticulata (tangerine)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Citrus reticulata (tangerine)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.