Paper · 2007 · DergiPark (Istanbul University)

Mandarin Yield Response to Partial Root Drying and Conventional Deficit Irrigation

C. Kırda; Fatih Topaloğlu; S. Topcu; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
24
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Fruit yield response of a mandarin (Citrus reticulata cv. Marisol) orchard to deficit irrigation, which was imposed either through conventional deficit irrigation (DI) or a newly evolving irrigation technique, called partial root drying (PRD), was investigated. The PRD practice simply requires wetting of one half of the rooting zone and leaving the other half dry, thereby utilising reduced amount of irrigation water applied. The wetted and dry sides are interchanged in the subsequent irrigations. Six irrigation treatments were tested: (1) TR, traditional farmers’ method of irrigation where irrigation management was left to the full control of a grower; (2) FULL irrigation where the full amount of irrigation water (60% Class-A pan evaporation) was applied to the both halves of tree-root zone; (3) 1PRD30 and (4) 1PRD50, 30 and 50% reduced amount of irrigation water, compared respectively to FULL irrigation, was applied alternately on each half side of the tree rows, and the irrigated side was changed every irrigation; (5) 2PRD50, 50% reduced amount of irrigation water was applied on each half side of the tree rows, and the irrigated side was changed every other irrigation; (6) DI50, conventional deficit irrigation where 50% reduced amount of irrigation water, compared to FULL irrigation, was applied to the both halves of the tree-root zone, similar to FULL irrigation. A randomised complete block experiment design with 6 replicates, 4 trees each, was used. The orchard had 6-year-old trees, planted in 5-m rows of a parallelogram arrangement. A drip irrigation system with 2 laterals, laid along the tree rows with trees located 1.2 m midway between the laterals, was used. The drippers with 4 l h-1 discharge rate and 75-cm spacing formed 50-cm wide wet bands during irrigation, along the laterals underneath the tree rows. The yield within the range of 36 to 37 tons ha-1 was the highest and obtained under the traditional practice (TR) of irrigation where, however, more than double the amount of irrigation water was applied, compared to the control, FULL irrigation. The yield reduction under FULL irrigation was only marginal (10% to 14%), with, however, more than a 2-fold increase of irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE), compared to TR. The treatment 1PRD30 yielded 30.6 and 27.7 tons ha-1 in 2001 and 2002, respectively, and followed the yield of control, FULL irrigation treatment. No yield benefit was obtained with the treatment of 2PRD50, which produced the lowest fruit yield, next to the conventional deficit irrigation treatment (DI50). The ranking of fruit-yields, TR>FULL>1PRD30>1PRD50, was maintained over the 2 seasons, 2001 and 2002, although the differences were marginal and not statistically significant (P

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Traditional farmers’ irrigation gave the highest yield of 36 to 37 tons ha-1, with more than double the irrigation water of the FULL control.

Taxon
Citrus reticulataCitrus reticulatae0
Material
cv. Marisole0
Treatment
traditional practice (TR) of irrigatione1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
36 to 37 tons ha-1e1
Comparator
control, FULL irrigatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus reticulata
Citrus reticulata · TaxonJoe Ravi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit yield response of a mandarin (Citrus reticulata cv. Marisol) orchard to deficit irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
e1

“The yield within the range of 36 to 37 tons ha-1 was the highest and obtained under the traditional practice (TR) of irrigation where, however, more than double the amount of irrigation water was applied, compared to the control, FULL irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1856–2101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield reduction under FULL irrigation relative to TR was only marginal, at 10% to 14%.

Taxon
Citrus reticulataCitrus reticulatae0
Material
cv. Marisole0
Treatment
FULL irrigatione2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
reductione2
Value
10% to 14%e2
Qualifier
only marginale2
Comparator
TRe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus reticulata
Citrus reticulata · TaxonJoe Ravi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit yield response of a mandarin (Citrus reticulata cv. Marisol) orchard to deficit irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
e2

“The yield reduction under FULL irrigation was only marginal (10% to 14%), with, however, more than a 2-fold increase of irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE), compared to TR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2103–2277 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FULL irrigation more than doubled irrigation water use efficiency compared with TR.

Taxon
Citrus reticulataCitrus reticulatae0
Material
cv. Marisole0
Treatment
FULL irrigatione2
Outcome
irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE)e2
Direction
increasee2
Value
more than a 2-folde2
Comparator
TRe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus reticulata
Citrus reticulata · TaxonJoe Ravi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit yield response of a mandarin (Citrus reticulata cv. Marisol) orchard to deficit irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
e2

“The yield reduction under FULL irrigation was only marginal (10% to 14%), with, however, more than a 2-fold increase of irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE), compared to TR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2103–2277 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1PRD30 yield followed that of the FULL irrigation control, at 30.6 and 27.7 tons ha-1 in 2001 and 2002.

Taxon
Citrus reticulataCitrus reticulatae0
Material
cv. Marisole0
Treatment
1PRD30e3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
followede3
Value
30.6 and 27.7 tons ha-1e3
Comparator
control, FULL irrigation treatmente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus reticulata
Citrus reticulata · TaxonJoe Ravi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit yield response of a mandarin (Citrus reticulata cv. Marisol) orchard to deficit irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
e3

“The treatment 1PRD30 yielded 30.6 and 27.7 tons ha-1 in 2001 and 2002, respectively, and followed the yield of control, FULL irrigation treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2279–2424 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2PRD50 produced the lowest fruit yield, next to the conventional deficit irrigation treatment DI50.

Taxon
Citrus reticulataCitrus reticulatae0
Material
cv. Marisole0
Treatment
2PRD50e4
Outcome
fruit yielde4
Direction
loweste4
Comparator
conventional deficit irrigation treatment (DI50)e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus reticulata
Citrus reticulata · TaxonJoe Ravi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit yield response of a mandarin (Citrus reticulata cv. Marisol) orchard to deficit irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
e4

“No yield benefit was obtained with the treatment of 2PRD50, which produced the lowest fruit yield, next to the conventional deficit irrigation treatment (DI50)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2426–2585 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2PRD50 gave no yield benefit.

Taxon
Citrus reticulataCitrus reticulatae0
Material
cv. Marisole0
Treatment
2PRD50e4
Outcome
yield benefite4
Direction
No yield benefite4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus reticulata
Citrus reticulata · TaxonJoe Ravi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit yield response of a mandarin (Citrus reticulata cv. Marisol) orchard to deficit irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
e4

“No yield benefit was obtained with the treatment of 2PRD50, which produced the lowest fruit yield, next to the conventional deficit irrigation treatment (DI50)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2426–2585 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Citrus reticulata (tangerine)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Citrus reticulata (tangerine)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.