Paper · 2016 · Journal of Oilseeds Research

Response of contrasting root genotypes of castor (Ricinus communis L.) to water stress

P LAKSHMAMMA; LAKSHMI PRAYAGA; C SARADA

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Two contrasting genotypes for root biomass i.e. RG-111 with good root, RG-1520 with poor root were studied for root, shoot growth till 90 DAS in root structures and also in field for seed yield by imposing water stress (30-90 DAS) during late rabi (2011-12). The reduction in root length was less due to stress. But root volume, dry weight and shoot growth reduced with stress and the per cent reduction was less in poorer root genotype (RG-1520) compared to good root genotype (RG-111). With drought stress in field, the growth before relieving stress, seed yield of different order branches and total seed yield reduced significantly in both genotypes. RG-1520 showed adaptation to survive drought stress in root structure and in field by increasing chlorophyll content (SCMR), less reduction in relative water content (RWC), decrease in specific leaf area (SLA) and increase in bloomcontent as that of good root genotype RG-111. But, seed yield reduction was more in poor root genotype (RG-1520) and also recorded high drought susceptibility index (DSI) as its photo assimilates were spent for its survival in stress and assimilate translocation was less for seed growth. Hence good root is important for crop survival, growth and seed yield especially in drought conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root length had a smaller reduction under water stress.

Treatment
stresse0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ricinus communis
Ricinus communis · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction in root length was less due to stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–310 · show in text ↑
t0

“castor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root volume, root dry weight and shoot growth fell under stress, with a smaller percentage reduction in RG-1520 than RG-111.

Material
RG-1520e0
Treatment
stresse0
Outcome
root volume, dry weight and shoot growthe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
RG-111e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ricinus communis
Ricinus communis · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root volume, dry weight and shoot growth reduced with stress and the per cent reduction was less in poorer root genotype (RG-1520) compared to good root genotype (RG-111)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–486 · show in text ↑
t0

“castor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Field drought significantly reduced growth before stress relief in both genotypes.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
growth before relieving stresse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
both genotypese0
Setting
fielde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ricinus communis
Ricinus communis · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With drought stress in field, the growth before relieving stress, seed yield of different order branches and total seed yield reduced significantly in both genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–653 · show in text ↑
t0

“castor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Field drought significantly reduced seed yield of different-order branches in both genotypes.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
seed yield of different order branchese0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
both genotypese0
Setting
fielde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ricinus communis
Ricinus communis · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With drought stress in field, the growth before relieving stress, seed yield of different order branches and total seed yield reduced significantly in both genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–653 · show in text ↑
t0

“castor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Field drought significantly reduced total seed yield in both genotypes.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
total seed yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
both genotypese0
Setting
fielde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ricinus communis
Ricinus communis · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With drought stress in field, the growth before relieving stress, seed yield of different order branches and total seed yield reduced significantly in both genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–653 · show in text ↑
t0

“castor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, RG-1520 increased chlorophyll content.

Material
RG-1520e0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ricinus communis
Ricinus communis · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RG-1520 showed adaptation to survive drought stress in root structure and in field by increasing chlorophyll content (SCMR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–778 · show in text ↑
t0

“castor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RG-1520 had less reduction in relative water content under drought.

Material
RG-1520e0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
relative water contente0
Direction
less reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ricinus communis
Ricinus communis · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RG-1520 showed adaptation to survive drought stress in root structure and in field by increasing chlorophyll content (SCMR), less reduction in relative water content (RWC), decrease in specific leaf area (SLA) and increase in bloomcontent as that of good root genotype RG-111”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–930 · show in text ↑
t0

“castor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RG-1520 decreased specific leaf area under drought.

Material
RG-1520e0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
specific leaf areae0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ricinus communis
Ricinus communis · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RG-1520 showed adaptation to survive drought stress in root structure and in field by increasing chlorophyll content (SCMR), less reduction in relative water content (RWC), decrease in specific leaf area (SLA) and increase in bloomcontent as that of good root genotype RG-111”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–930 · show in text ↑
t0

“castor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RG-1520 increased bloomcontent under drought.

Material
RG-1520e0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
bloomcontente0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ricinus communis
Ricinus communis · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RG-1520 showed adaptation to survive drought stress in root structure and in field by increasing chlorophyll content (SCMR), less reduction in relative water content (RWC), decrease in specific leaf area (SLA) and increase in bloomcontent as that of good root genotype RG-111”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–930 · show in text ↑
t0

“castor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield reduction was greater in RG-1520.

Material
RG-1520e0
Outcome
seed yield reductione0
Direction
moree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ricinus communis
Ricinus communis · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed yield reduction was more in poor root genotype (RG-1520)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–998 · show in text ↑
t0

“castor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RG-1520 had a high drought susceptibility index.

Material
RG-1520e0
Outcome
drought susceptibility indexe0
Direction
highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ricinus communis
Ricinus communis · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“poor root genotype (RG-1520) and also recorded high drought susceptibility index (DSI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1056 · show in text ↑
t0

“castor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute lower seed growth in RG-1520 to assimilates spent on survival and reduced translocation.

Outcome
seed growthe0
Qualifier
photo assimilates were spent for its survival in stress and assimilate translocation was lesse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ricinus communis
Ricinus communis · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“its photo assimilates were spent for its survival in stress and assimilate translocation was less for seed growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1173 · show in text ↑
t0

“castor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that good roots support castor survival, growth and seed yield under drought.

Outcome
good root is important for crop survival, growth and seed yielde0
Qualifier
drought conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ricinus communis
Ricinus communis · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“good root is important for crop survival, growth and seed yield especially in drought conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1277 · show in text ↑
t0

“castor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: pigments · Ricinus communis (castor bean)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Ricinus communis (castor bean)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

drought · growth · Ricinus communis (castor bean)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

drought · yield · Ricinus communis (castor bean)Results agree

7 papers: 0 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.