Paper · 2023 · Agricultural Water Management

Irrigation depth and nitrogen rate effects on seed cotton yield, fiber quality and water-nitrogen utilization efficiency in southern Xinjiang, China

Zhentao Bai; Wenqiang Bai; Cong Xie; et al.

18
claims
32
verbatim quotes
40
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Seed cotton yield and fiber quality are two primary factors that influence the international competitiveness of cotton. To enhance the water-nitrogen utilization efficiency and promote the sustainable cotton production, field experiments were performed in 2020 and 2021 to explore the effects of irrigation depth and nitrogen (N) fertilization rate on N uptake and distribution, seed cotton yield, fiber quality traits and water-nitrogen utilization efficiency in the Korla region of southern Xinjiang, China. Three irrigation depths (W1: 60% ETc, W2: 80% ETc, W3: 100% ETc; ETc was crop water consumption) and four N rates (N0: 0 kg ha−1, N200: 200 kg ha−1, N300: 300 kg ha−1, N400: 400 kg ha−1) were applied. The results showed irrigation depth and N rate significantly influenced N uptake and distribution in plant organs, seed cotton yield, crop water productivity (WP), partial factor productivity of nitrogen (PFPN) and some fiber quality traits. Increasing irrigation depth improved plant height, leaf area index, aboveground dry matter and seed cotton yield, while increasing N rate increased and then declined these indicators. At the squaring and flowering stages, the N accumulation in all parts of cotton increased as irrigation depth and N rate increased, whereas it increased and then declined with increasing N rate at the boll-setting and harvesting stages. At the squaring and flowering stages, N was mainly accumulated in the leaves. As the growth period progressed, N was transported to bolls and the proportion of N content in leaves decreased. The proportion of N accumulation in cotton bolls was largest at the boll-setting and harvesting stages, and the N accumulation in plant organs followed the order of boll > leaf > stem > root. As irrigation depth increased, PFPN increased but WP decreased. As N rate increased, PFPN decreased but WP increased and then declined. The increases in N rate improved fiber quality. The maximum seed cotton yield (7578 kg ha−1 in 2020 and 7173 kg ha−1 in 2021) and greater WP, PFPN and fiber quality occurred in W3N300, which was recommended as a sustainable cotton production strategy in the Korla region of southern Xinjiang and elsewhere with similar environments to improve water-nitrogen utilization efficiency, seed cotton yield and alleviate soil nitrate pollution risk.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation and N significantly influenced N uptake, yield, productivity and some fiber traits.

Treatment
irrigation depth and N ratee0
Outcome
N uptake and distribution in plant organs, seed cotton yield, crop water productivity (WP)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation depth and N rate significantly influenced N uptake and distribution in plant organs, seed cotton yield, crop water productivity (WP), partial factor productivity of nitrogen (PFPN) and some fiber quality traits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–952 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater irrigation improved plant height, leaf area index and aboveground dry matter.

Treatment
Increasing irrigation depthe0
Outcome
plant height, leaf area index, aboveground dry mattere0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing irrigation depth improved plant height, leaf area index, aboveground dry matter and seed cotton yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1065 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater irrigation improved seed cotton yield.

Treatment
Increasing irrigation depthe0
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing irrigation depth improved plant height, leaf area index, aboveground dry matter and seed cotton yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1065 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N first increased then decreased growth and yield indicators.

Treatment
increasing N ratee0
Outcome
these indicatorse0
Direction
increased and then declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing N rate increased and then declined these indicators.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1136 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“irrigation depth and N rate significantly influenced N uptake and distribution in plant organs, seed cotton yield, crop water productivity (WP), partial factor productivity of nitrogen (PFPN) and some fiber quality traits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–952 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N accumulation increased with irrigation and N at squaring and flowering.

Organ / stage
squaring and flowering stagese0
Treatment
irrigation depth and N ratee0
Outcome
N accumulation in all parts of cottone0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the squaring and flowering stages, the N accumulation in all parts of cotton increased as irrigation depth and N rate increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1267 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N accumulation first increased then fell with N at boll setting and harvest.

Organ / stage
boll-setting and harvesting stagese0
Treatment
increasing N ratee0
Outcome
N accumulatione1
Direction
increased and then declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it increased and then declined with increasing N rate at the boll-setting and harvesting stages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1373 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“At the squaring and flowering stages, the N accumulation in all parts of cotton increased as irrigation depth and N rate increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1267 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaves accumulated most N at squaring and flowering.

Organ / stage
squaring and flowering stagese0
Outcome
N was mainly accumulated in the leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the squaring and flowering stages, N was mainly accumulated in the leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1374–1451 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N moved to bolls and leaf N fraction declined over growth.

Organ / stage
bollse0
Outcome
proportion of N content in leavese0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As the growth period progressed, N was transported to bolls and the proportion of N content in leaves decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1564 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bolls had the largest N share at boll setting and harvest, ordered boll, leaf, stem, root.

Organ / stage
boll-setting and harvesting stagese0
Outcome
proportion of N accumulation in cotton bollse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The proportion of N accumulation in cotton bolls was largest at the boll-setting and harvesting stages, and the N accumulation in plant organs followed the order of boll > leaf > stem > root.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1565–1756 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater irrigation increased partial factor productivity of N.

Treatment
irrigation depthe0
Outcome
PFPNe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As irrigation depth increased, PFPN increased but WP decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1757–1820 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater irrigation decreased crop water productivity.

Treatment
irrigation depthe0
Outcome
WPe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As irrigation depth increased, PFPN increased but WP decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1757–1820 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater N decreased partial factor productivity.

Treatment
N ratee0
Outcome
PFPNe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As N rate increased, PFPN decreased but WP increased and then declined.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1821–1892 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater N first increased then decreased water productivity.

Treatment
N ratee0
Outcome
WPe0
Direction
increased and then declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As N rate increased, PFPN decreased but WP increased and then declined.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1821–1892 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher N rates improved fiber quality.

Treatment
increases in N ratee0
Outcome
fiber qualitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increases in N rate improved fiber quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1893–1940 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

W3N300 produced maximum seed cotton yield of 7578 kg ha−1 in 2020.

Treatment
W3N300e0
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
7578 kg ha−1e0
Qualifier
2020e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum seed cotton yield (7578 kg ha−1 in 2020 and 7173 kg ha−1 in 2021) and greater WP, PFPN and fiber quality occurred in W3N300”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1941–2076 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

W3N300 produced maximum seed cotton yield of 7173 kg ha−1 in 2021.

Treatment
W3N300e0
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
7173 kg ha−1e0
Qualifier
2021e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum seed cotton yield (7578 kg ha−1 in 2020 and 7173 kg ha−1 in 2021) and greater WP, PFPN and fiber quality occurred in W3N300”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1941–2076 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

W3N300 had greater water and nitrogen productivity and fiber quality.

Treatment
W3N300e0
Outcome
WP, PFPN and fiber qualitye0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greater WP, PFPN and fiber quality occurred in W3N300”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2023–2076 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend W3N300 for sustainable production in Korla and similar environments.

Outcome
sustainable cotton production strategye0
Setting
Korla region of southern Xinjiange0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“W3N300, which was recommended as a sustainable cotton production strategy in the Korla region of southern Xinjiang and elsewhere with similar environments to improve water-nitrogen utilization efficiency, seed cotton yield and alleviate soil nitrate pollution risk.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2070–2335 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

103 papers: 65 positive, 38 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: water · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 14 positive, 4 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 27 positive, 5 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 71 positive, 8 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

131 papers: 110 positive, 21 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

irrigation · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

144 papers: 101 positive, 43 negative or no effect

100 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

140 papers more in this group

See all 144 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

343 papers: 286 positive, 57 negative or no effect

285 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

339 papers more in this group

See all 343 papers →

irrigation · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

399 papers: 304 positive, 95 negative or no effect

303 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

395 papers more in this group

See all 399 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.