Abstract
Abstract: Maize is the most cultivated cereal crop in Ghana and plays a significant role in consumer diets. An ideal way of improving yield is through the use of balanced macro and micronutrient doses. Fertilizers supplied through soils are subjected to leaching, fixation, surface runoff, erosion, volatilization, extremely high or low pH render nutrients unabsorbable by plants. Foliar application of fertilizer supplies nutrients directly to the stomata and cuticle of the leaves which saves time and increases yield as proposed by crop physiologist. The experiment was designed as a multi-location study comprising eight treatments. These treatments were evaluated in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications. The experiment was conducted at the experimental field of University for Development Studies, Nyankpala (9° 24’ 39’’ N, 0° 59’ 2’’ W 170 m) and Kpaliga (9° 26’ 44’’ N, 0° 57’ 58’’ W 170 m) in the Northern region of Ghana. Application of nitrogen in a split form has the ability to broaden the leaf surface area to receive the foliar applied micronutrients. However, increasing nitrogen at basal application and reducing it at top dressing (NP2K treatments) stands a better chance of broadening the leaf surface area. The general progression of leaf area index could be attributed to the adequate supply of macronutrients. NP2K+[P+Zn+Fe] produced the highest grain yield. There was significant difference between foliar zinc and control (NP2K). Maize plants responded to foliar application of phosphorus, zinc and iron, but not in terms of yield differences. It will be needful to repeat this experiment since the drought affected the response of maize to foliar applied fertilizer to yield. Socio economic analysis should be done to show whether the increment in grain yield will compensate for the cost of application of foliar fertilizer.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
NP2K+[P+Zn+Fe] produced the highest grain yield of maize.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“Maize is the most cultivated cereal crop in Ghana”
e2“NP2K+[P+Zn+Fe] produced the highest grain yield”
e0“the experimental field of University for Development Studies, Nyankpala”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar zinc differed significantly from the NP2K control in maize.
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“Maize is the most cultivated cereal crop in Ghana”
e3“There was significant difference between foliar zinc and control (NP2K)”
Claim · model-written summary
Maize responded to foliar application of phosphorus, zinc and iron.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“Maize is the most cultivated cereal crop in Ghana”
e4“Maize plants responded to foliar application of phosphorus, zinc and iron, but not in terms of yield differences”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar application of phosphorus, zinc and iron produced no yield difference in maize.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“Maize is the most cultivated cereal crop in Ghana”
e4“Maize plants responded to foliar application of phosphorus, zinc and iron, but not in terms of yield differences”
Claim · model-written summary
The progression of leaf area index may be attributed to adequate supply of macronutrients.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“Maize is the most cultivated cereal crop in Ghana”
e5“The general progression of leaf area index could be attributed to the adequate supply of macronutrients”
Claim · model-written summary
Split nitrogen application with more basal and less top dressing is expected to broaden leaf surface area in maize.
- Treatment
- increasing nitrogen at basal application and reducing it at top dressing (NP2K treatments)e6
- Outcome
- broadening the leaf surface areae6
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“Maize is the most cultivated cereal crop in Ghana”
e6“increasing nitrogen at basal application and reducing it at top dressing (NP2K treatments) stands a better chance of broadening the leaf surface area”
Claim · model-written summary
Drought affected the response of maize to foliar applied fertilizer for yield.
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e7“since the drought affected the response of maize to foliar applied fertilizer to yield”
The same questions in other papers
iron atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
69 papers more in this group
See all 73 papers →zinc atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
390 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
437 papers more in this group
See all 441 papers →phosphorus · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 549 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
623 papers more in this group
See all 627 papers →application · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 575 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
625 papers more in this group
See all 629 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.