Paper · 2023 · Field Crops Research

Nitrogen fertilizer and pronitridine rates for corn production in the Midwest U.S.

Harpreet Kaur; Kelly A. Nelson; Christopher K. Wikle; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
12
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Reducing nitrogen (N) losses can be accomplished by applying recommended N rates and using nitrification inhibitors (NI). In some agricultural systems, managing N application rate or using a NI could improve N use efficiency and increase crop yields. The objectives of this 13 site-year study were to determine the agronomic optimum N rate (AONR) application rate using linear plateau and quadratic plateau models, determine the optimum pronitridine rate when applied with 70 % of the recommended N amount, and evaluate the effect of nitrapyrin and pronitridine on corn (Zea mays L.) yield. In this experiment, pronitridine and nitrapyrin were used as NIs and were applied in the fall and spring. This research was conducted in the US in Illinois (IL), Missouri (MO), and Nebraska (NE) from 2016 to 2019. The AONR varied from 176 to 291 kg ha-1 in different site-years. The optimal pronitridine rate was predicted using the generalized additive model (GAM) for each site. A pronitridine rate of 5.6 g kg-1 N and 8.2 g kg-1 N was recommended for well drained (NE) and poorly drained (MO and IL) sites, respectively. The pronitridine application at an average rate of 5.6 g kg-1 N increased corn grain yield 4 % compared to the non-treated control. Economic analysis showed an increase in gross margin returns of 32–67 $ ha-1 in poorly drained soils (MO & IL) when applied at 8 g kg-1 with fall and spring N application. Whereas 10–30 $ ha-1 higher gross margins were observed in well-drained soils (NE) with an application of 4 g kg-1 of pronitridine for fall and spring application timings. The differences in AONR and pronitridine rate prediction observed in this study emphasize the variability caused by factors such as the soil, environment, and their interaction with the N cycle. When we evaluated pronitridine and nitrapyrin with all site years combined, no differences between the two NIs were observed in terms of corn yield production. Our findings are the first to quantify corn yield response for pronitridine applications at different locations and multiple rates in the Midwest U.S. The results of this study highlight the optimum pronitridine optimum rate for improved corn yield in poorly drained and well-drained soils in the Midwest U.S. Profitability of pronitridine can be improved by applying an optimum rate based on N requirements and soil conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agronomic optimum nitrogen rates varied from 176 to 291 kg ha-1 among site-years.

Outcome
AONRe0
Value
176 to 291 kg ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The AONR varied from 176 to 291 kg ha-1 in different site-years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–868 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–51 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The recommended pronitridine rate was 5.6 g kg-1 N at well-drained Nebraska sites.

Outcome
pronitridine ratee0
Value
5.6 g kg-1 Ne0
Setting
well drained (NE)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A pronitridine rate of 5.6 g kg-1 N and 8.2 g kg-1 N was recommended for well drained (NE) and poorly drained (MO and IL) sites, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1113 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–51 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The recommended pronitridine rate was 8.2 g kg-1 N at poorly drained Missouri and Illinois sites.

Outcome
pronitridine ratee0
Value
8.2 g kg-1 Ne0
Setting
poorly drained (MO and IL)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A pronitridine rate of 5.6 g kg-1 N and 8.2 g kg-1 N was recommended for well drained (NE) and poorly drained (MO and IL) sites, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1113 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pronitridine at 5.6 g kg-1 N increased corn grain yield 4% against untreated controls.

Treatment
pronitridine application at an average rate of 5.6 g kg-1 Ne0
Outcome
corn grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4 %e0
Comparator
non-treated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pronitridine application at an average rate of 5.6 g kg-1 N increased corn grain yield 4 % compared to the non-treated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1245 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pronitridine at 8 g kg-1 increased gross margin by 32–67 $ ha-1 in poorly drained Missouri and Illinois soils.

Treatment
8 g kg-1 with fall and spring N applicatione0
Outcome
gross margin returnse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
32–67 $ ha-1e0
Setting
poorly drained soils (MO & IL)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increase in gross margin returns of 32–67 $ ha-1 in poorly drained soils (MO & IL) when applied at 8 g kg-1 with fall and spring N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1417 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pronitridine at 4 g kg-1 produced 10–30 $ ha-1 higher gross margins in well-drained Nebraska soils.

Treatment
4 g kg-1 of pronitridinee0
Outcome
gross marginse0
Direction
highere0
Value
10–30 $ ha-1e0
Setting
well-drained soils (NE)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“10–30 $ ha-1 higher gross margins were observed in well-drained soils (NE) with an application of 4 g kg-1 of pronitridine for fall and spring application timings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1427–1589 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pronitridine and nitrapyrin did not differ in corn yield across all site-years.

Outcome
corn yield productione0
Direction
no differencese0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no differences between the two NIs were observed in terms of corn yield production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1862–1944 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–51 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend setting pronitridine rates according to nitrogen requirements and soil conditions to improve profitability.

Treatment
applying an optimum rate based on N requirements and soil conditionse0
Outcome
Profitability of pronitridinee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Profitability of pronitridine can be improved by applying an optimum rate based on N requirements and soil conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2256–2373 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–51 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.