Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Effect of Microbial Consortia Inoculation and Chemical Fertilizers on Growth Parameter and Nodulation of Soybean (Glycine max L. merill.) and Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

Syed Javed; Syed Ismail; Dhamak A. L.; et al.

5
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Microbial consortia inoculation and chemical fertilizers significantly impact plant growth parameters. Microbial consortia contribute to soil health by enhancing nutrient availability and promoting plant growth, while chemical fertilizers provide essential nutrients. In this study, an Field Experiment was conducted during two successive years in Kharif and Rabi 2020-21 and 2021-22 consecutively on effect of microbial consortia inoculation and chemical fertilizers on productivity and soil properties in soybean chickpea sequence on vertisol at research farm of department soil science and agricultural chemistry Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Agricultural University, Parbhani (MAH) India. The Soil of experimental site was classified as vertisol (Typic Haplustert) dominant montmorillonite type with kaollinite and illite mineral alkaline in reaction. Experimental treatments consist of four levels of laboratory evaluated microbial cultures (Bradyrhizobium, Mesorhizobium, Bacillus megaterium, Pseudomonas striata, Thiobacillus thioxidant) and uninoculated control and four levels of chemical fertilizers (100 % RDF, 75 % RDF, 50 % RDF and Control i.e. (without fertilizers)). Seed treatment of soybean and chickpea was done with microbial consortia immediate before sowing and chemical fertilizers were applied at the time of sowing as per treatments. The results revealed that the application of microbial inoculants with chemical fertilizers showed significant effect on biometric attributes and nodulation of soybean and chickpea. The microbial consortia Rhizobium spp.+ Pseudomonas striata inoculation has highest plant height, shoot weight, root length, number of nodule, fresh weight of nodules, and dry weight of noduels in both crops as compared to uninoculated control. However, the application of chemical fertilizer i.e. N,P and K 100% RDF obviously increased the height, shoot weight, number of nodulation, and fresh weight of nodules in respect of both soybean and chickpea crops. The chemical fetilizers N,P and K are applied in the form of Urea, single super phosphate and muriate of potash respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Rhizobium spp. plus Pseudomonas striata consortium gave the highest plant height, shoot weight and root length compared with uninoculated control.

Taxon
soybean and chickpeaCicer arietinumGlycine maxe1
Treatment
microbial consortia Rhizobium spp.+ Pseudomonas striata inoculatione2
Interactor
Rhizobium spp.Rhizobiume2symbiont
Second interactor
Pseudomonas striataPseudomonas putidae2symbiont
Outcome
plant height, shoot weight, root lengthe2
Direction
higheste2
Comparator
uninoculated controle2
Setting
Field Experimente4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · Second interactorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“application of microbial inoculants with chemical fertilizers showed significant effect on biometric attributes and nodulation of soybean and chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1534 · show in text ↑
e2

“The microbial consortia Rhizobium spp.+ Pseudomonas striata inoculation has highest plant height, shoot weight, root length, number of nodule, fresh weight of nodules, and dry weight of noduels in both crops as compared to uninoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1536–1779 · show in text ↑
e4

“an Field Experiment was conducted during two successive years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Rhizobium spp. plus Pseudomonas striata consortium gave the highest number of nodules, nodule fresh weight and nodule dry weight compared with uninoculated control.

Taxon
soybean and chickpeaCicer arietinumGlycine maxe1
Treatment
microbial consortia Rhizobium spp.+ Pseudomonas striata inoculatione2
Interactor
Rhizobium spp.Rhizobiume2symbiont
Second interactor
Pseudomonas striataPseudomonas putidae2symbiont
Outcome
number of nodule, fresh weight of nodules, and dry weight of noduelse2
Direction
higheste2
Comparator
uninoculated controle2
Setting
Field Experimente4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · Second interactorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“application of microbial inoculants with chemical fertilizers showed significant effect on biometric attributes and nodulation of soybean and chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1534 · show in text ↑
e2

“The microbial consortia Rhizobium spp.+ Pseudomonas striata inoculation has highest plant height, shoot weight, root length, number of nodule, fresh weight of nodules, and dry weight of noduels in both crops as compared to uninoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1536–1779 · show in text ↑
e4

“an Field Experiment was conducted during two successive years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical fertilizer at 100% RDF of N, P and K increased plant height and shoot weight compared with no fertilizer.

Taxon
soybean and chickpeaCicer arietinumGlycine maxe1
Treatment
N,P and K 100% RDFe5
Outcome
height, shoot weighte5
Direction
increasede5
Comparator
without fertilizerse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“application of microbial inoculants with chemical fertilizers showed significant effect on biometric attributes and nodulation of soybean and chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1534 · show in text ↑
e5

“application of chemical fertilizer i.e. N,P and K 100% RDF obviously increased the height, shoot weight, number of nodulation, and fresh weight of nodules in respect of both soybean and chickpea crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1794–1994 · show in text ↑
e6

“Control i.e. (without fertilizers)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical fertilizer at 100% RDF of N, P and K increased the number of nodulation and fresh weight of nodules compared with no fertilizer.

Taxon
soybean and chickpeaCicer arietinumGlycine maxe1
Treatment
N,P and K 100% RDFe5
Outcome
number of nodulation, and fresh weight of nodulese5
Direction
increasede5
Comparator
without fertilizerse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“application of microbial inoculants with chemical fertilizers showed significant effect on biometric attributes and nodulation of soybean and chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1534 · show in text ↑
e5

“application of chemical fertilizer i.e. N,P and K 100% RDF obviously increased the height, shoot weight, number of nodulation, and fresh weight of nodules in respect of both soybean and chickpea crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1794–1994 · show in text ↑
e6

“Control i.e. (without fertilizers)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial inoculants combined with chemical fertilizers had a significant effect on biometric attributes and nodulation of soybean and chickpea.

Taxon
soybean and chickpeaCicer arietinumGlycine maxe1
Treatment
application of microbial inoculants with chemical fertilizerse1
Outcome
biometric attributes and nodulatione1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“application of microbial inoculants with chemical fertilizers showed significant effect on biometric attributes and nodulation of soybean and chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1534 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 45 positive, 1 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Rhizobium · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 45 positive, 1 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Rhizobium · symbiosis · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 45 positive, 2 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Rhizobium · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 51 positive, 1 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

Pseudomonas putida · symbiosis · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Pseudomonas putida · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Pseudomonas putida · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

nitrogen · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

16 papers: 9 positive, 7 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

8 of 27 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.