Abstract
This study provides an innovation in making compost from rice straw (low quality) mixed with peanut residue (high quality) to improve the quality of rice straw compost. The purpose of this research was to discover the optimum composition of a mixture of peanut residue and straw for mineralization, absorption, and Nitrogen Use Efficiency (NUE) and its effect on upland rice plants. The study was conducted in three stages. The first stage determined the quality of five compost mixtures: C1, C2, C3, C4, and C5. The second phase of testing for cumulative N minerals was performed after 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks of incubation. The third stage examined the impact of the compost mixture on the growth and yield of upland rice in comparison with two treatments, namely the control and NPK fertilizer. The results showed a similarity in the forms of mineralization, where the cumulative N mineral increased with the addition of peanut residue to the compost mixture. The use of a mixture of peanut residue and rice straw compost increased net mineralization by 37.27% (C5) to 59.48% (C1), N uptake by 49.19% (C5) to 62.95% (C3), and NUE by 15.04% (C4) to 51.48% (C3). A strong relationship was detected between the quality of the compost and the forms of N in the soil, particularly the nitrate content, total N minerals, and N microbial biomass, with correlation coefficients of 0.92, 0.88, and 0.94, respectively. A strong to very strong relationship was detected between N form and N uptake (r = 0.84), plant height (r = 0.79), number of tillers (r = 0.78), yield of rice plants (r = 0.93 (plant total dry weight), and r = 0.76 (grain weight). The optimum N uptake, NUE, and yield of upland rice were shown by C3 treatment of 405.28 mg pot-1, 42.21%, and 6.19 tons ha-1, respectively.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Peanut residue and rice straw compost increased net mineralization by 37.27% (C5) to 59.48% (C1)
- Taxon
- upland rice
Oryza sativae0 - Treatment
- use of a mixture of peanut residue and rice straw composte1
- Outcome
- net mineralizatione1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 37.27% (C5) to 59.48% (C1)e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“its effect on upland rice plants”
e1“The use of a mixture of peanut residue and rice straw compost increased net mineralization by 37.27% (C5) to 59.48% (C1), N uptake by 49.19% (C5) to 62.95% (C3), and NUE by 15.04% (C4) to 51.48% (C3)”
Claim · model-written summary
Peanut residue and rice straw compost increased N uptake by 49.19% (C5) to 62.95% (C3)
- Taxon
- upland riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- use of a mixture of peanut residue and rice straw composte1
- Outcome
- N uptakee1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 49.19% (C5) to 62.95% (C3)e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“its effect on upland rice plants”
e1“The use of a mixture of peanut residue and rice straw compost increased net mineralization by 37.27% (C5) to 59.48% (C1), N uptake by 49.19% (C5) to 62.95% (C3), and NUE by 15.04% (C4) to 51.48% (C3)”
Claim · model-written summary
Peanut residue and rice straw compost increased NUE by 15.04% (C4) to 51.48% (C3)
- Taxon
- upland riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- use of a mixture of peanut residue and rice straw composte1
- Outcome
- NUEe1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 15.04% (C4) to 51.48% (C3)e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“its effect on upland rice plants”
e1“The use of a mixture of peanut residue and rice straw compost increased net mineralization by 37.27% (C5) to 59.48% (C1), N uptake by 49.19% (C5) to 62.95% (C3), and NUE by 15.04% (C4) to 51.48% (C3)”
Claim · model-written summary
Compost quality was strongly related to soil nitrate content (r = 0.92)
- Taxon
- upland riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- the quality of the composte2
- Outcome
- nitrate contente2
- Value
- 0.92e2
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“its effect on upland rice plants”
e2“A strong relationship was detected between the quality of the compost and the forms of N in the soil, particularly the nitrate content, total N minerals, and N microbial biomass, with correlation coefficients of 0.92, 0.88, and 0.94, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Compost quality was strongly related to soil total N minerals (r = 0.88)
- Taxon
- upland riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- the quality of the composte2
- Outcome
- total N mineralse2
- Value
- 0.88e2
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“its effect on upland rice plants”
e2“A strong relationship was detected between the quality of the compost and the forms of N in the soil, particularly the nitrate content, total N minerals, and N microbial biomass, with correlation coefficients of 0.92, 0.88, and 0.94, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Compost quality was strongly related to soil N microbial biomass (r = 0.94)
- Taxon
- upland riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- the quality of the composte2
- Outcome
- N microbial biomasse2
- Value
- 0.94e2
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“its effect on upland rice plants”
e2“A strong relationship was detected between the quality of the compost and the forms of N in the soil, particularly the nitrate content, total N minerals, and N microbial biomass, with correlation coefficients of 0.92, 0.88, and 0.94, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil N form was strongly to very strongly related to N uptake (r = 0.84)
- Taxon
- upland riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- N forme3
- Outcome
- N uptakee3
- Value
- r = 0.84e3
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“its effect on upland rice plants”
e3“A strong to very strong relationship was detected between N form and N uptake (r = 0.84), plant height (r = 0.79), number of tillers (r = 0.78), yield of rice plants (r = 0.93 (plant total dry weight), and r = 0.76 (grain weight)”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil N form was strongly to very strongly related to plant height (r = 0.79)
- Taxon
- upland riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- N forme3
- Outcome
- plant heighte3
- Value
- r = 0.79e3
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“its effect on upland rice plants”
e3“A strong to very strong relationship was detected between N form and N uptake (r = 0.84), plant height (r = 0.79), number of tillers (r = 0.78), yield of rice plants (r = 0.93 (plant total dry weight), and r = 0.76 (grain weight)”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil N form was strongly to very strongly related to number of tillers (r = 0.78)
- Taxon
- upland riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- N forme3
- Outcome
- number of tillerse3
- Value
- r = 0.78e3
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“its effect on upland rice plants”
e3“A strong to very strong relationship was detected between N form and N uptake (r = 0.84), plant height (r = 0.79), number of tillers (r = 0.78), yield of rice plants (r = 0.93 (plant total dry weight), and r = 0.76 (grain weight)”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil N form was strongly to very strongly related to plant total dry weight (r = 0.93)
- Taxon
- upland riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- N forme3
- Outcome
- plant total dry weighte3
- Value
- r = 0.93e3
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“its effect on upland rice plants”
e3“A strong to very strong relationship was detected between N form and N uptake (r = 0.84), plant height (r = 0.79), number of tillers (r = 0.78), yield of rice plants (r = 0.93 (plant total dry weight), and r = 0.76 (grain weight)”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil N form was strongly to very strongly related to grain weight (r = 0.76)
- Taxon
- upland riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- N forme3
- Outcome
- grain weighte3
- Value
- r = 0.76e3
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“its effect on upland rice plants”
e3“A strong to very strong relationship was detected between N form and N uptake (r = 0.84), plant height (r = 0.79), number of tillers (r = 0.78), yield of rice plants (r = 0.93 (plant total dry weight), and r = 0.76 (grain weight)”
Claim · model-written summary
C3 compost gave the optimum N uptake of 405.28 mg pot-1
- Taxon
- upland riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- C3 treatmente4
- Outcome
- N uptakee4
- Value
- 405.28 mg pot-1e4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“its effect on upland rice plants”
e4“The optimum N uptake, NUE, and yield of upland rice were shown by C3 treatment of 405.28 mg pot-1, 42.21%, and 6.19 tons ha-1, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
C3 compost gave the optimum NUE of 42.21%
- Taxon
- upland riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- C3 treatmente4
- Outcome
- NUEe4
- Value
- 42.21%e4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“its effect on upland rice plants”
e4“The optimum N uptake, NUE, and yield of upland rice were shown by C3 treatment of 405.28 mg pot-1, 42.21%, and 6.19 tons ha-1, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
C3 compost gave the optimum yield of upland rice, 6.19 tons ha-1
- Taxon
- upland riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- C3 treatmente4
- Outcome
- yield of upland ricee4
- Value
- 6.19 tons ha-1e4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“its effect on upland rice plants”
e4“The optimum N uptake, NUE, and yield of upland rice were shown by C3 treatment of 405.28 mg pot-1, 42.21%, and 6.19 tons ha-1, respectively”
The same questions in other papers
Arachis hypogaea · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
201 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
216 papers more in this group
See all 220 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
931 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
989 papers more in this group
See all 993 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.